Intravascular brachytherapy for the management of drug-eluting in-stent restenosis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Atul D Bali, Sadrine Lebrun, Abduljabar Adi, Varinder Singh, Michael C Kim, Arber Kodra
{"title":"Intravascular brachytherapy for the management of drug-eluting in-stent restenosis.","authors":"Atul D Bali, Sadrine Lebrun, Abduljabar Adi, Varinder Singh, Michael C Kim, Arber Kodra","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and clinical outcomes of coronary intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) as a treatment modality for multilayer in-stent restenosis (ISR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed 101 patients who presented for percutaneous intervention of recurrent drug-eluting stent ISR using IVBT from 2019 to 2023. The primary outcome assessed was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were aimed to establish procedural safety. All lesions had evaluation by either angiography, intravascular ultrasound, or both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of ISR was related to neointimal hyperplasia (61.4%), with stent underexpansion (11.9%) being the second most common cause. The average layer of stents in the sample was 1.90 layers. Prior to delivery of IVBT, lesions were prepared with balloon angioplasty, laser atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, or a combination of pretreatment strategies. The average time of the IVBT dwell period was 11 minutes, with an average dose of 21.76 Gy. Of the 101 patients evaluated, TLR occurred in 10.9% of patients at 1 year. Readmission at 30 days was 4.9% and vascular complications occurred in 3.9% of the patients. Major adverse cardiac events were limited to 0.9% of the patients, and no peri-procedural myocardial infarctions, urgent need for revascularization within 24 hours, need for mechanical support, nor cardiac arrest were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, IVBT proved to be a safe and effective treatment modality for multilayer ISR. The study generates the hypothesis for the routine use of IVBT in this commonly encountered clinical scenario. Larger and prospective randomized studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and clinical outcomes of coronary intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) as a treatment modality for multilayer in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed 101 patients who presented for percutaneous intervention of recurrent drug-eluting stent ISR using IVBT from 2019 to 2023. The primary outcome assessed was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were aimed to establish procedural safety. All lesions had evaluation by either angiography, intravascular ultrasound, or both.

Results: The majority of ISR was related to neointimal hyperplasia (61.4%), with stent underexpansion (11.9%) being the second most common cause. The average layer of stents in the sample was 1.90 layers. Prior to delivery of IVBT, lesions were prepared with balloon angioplasty, laser atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, or a combination of pretreatment strategies. The average time of the IVBT dwell period was 11 minutes, with an average dose of 21.76 Gy. Of the 101 patients evaluated, TLR occurred in 10.9% of patients at 1 year. Readmission at 30 days was 4.9% and vascular complications occurred in 3.9% of the patients. Major adverse cardiac events were limited to 0.9% of the patients, and no peri-procedural myocardial infarctions, urgent need for revascularization within 24 hours, need for mechanical support, nor cardiac arrest were observed.

Conclusions: In this study, IVBT proved to be a safe and effective treatment modality for multilayer ISR. The study generates the hypothesis for the routine use of IVBT in this commonly encountered clinical scenario. Larger and prospective randomized studies are needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信