Preoperative classification of urinary stones based on community detection.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Danhui Mao, Hao Liu, Qianshan Wang, Mingyan Ma, Mohan Zhang, Juanjuan Zhao, Xin Wang
{"title":"Preoperative classification of urinary stones based on community detection.","authors":"Danhui Mao, Hao Liu, Qianshan Wang, Mingyan Ma, Mohan Zhang, Juanjuan Zhao, Xin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01711-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the treatment of urinary stones, surgical intervention is crucial. Urinary stones composition and type directly affect surgical planning. However, research on preoperative stone composition analysis is limited. This paper aimed to predict urinary stones types preoperatively using clinical data. Data from 1020 patients, including stone composition, clinical biochemical indicators, and demographic information, were collected. A stone composition graph network was constructed using cosine similarity, with stone composition as nodes and biochemical/demographic data as node features. The Louvain community detection algorithm was utilized to divide the network into distinct communities for the classification of stone types, with the effectiveness of the partitioning evaluated by the Modularity score. Stone types were classified, and their distribution across genders and age groups was described. Clinical feature averages were calculated for each community, and patients were assigned to the most similar community. Six machine learning algorithms (RandomForest, GradientBoosting, SVM, KNN, Logistic Regression, XGBoost) were trained to predict stone types. Model performance was evaluated, and the importance of clinical features for prediction was ranked. Six stone types were identified (Modularity = 0.828), namely common COM (Class I), COM with minor AU (Class II), COM with high UA (Class III), COM containing MAP (Class IV), high CAP-MAP (Class V), and high COM-CAP containing DCPD (Class VI). Among males, Class III and Class I were most prevalent; among females, Class V and Class III were most prevalent (χ<sup>2</sup> = 95.066, P < 0.001). Patients with Class IV stones were significantly older than those with Class I stones (P = 0.038). GradientBoosting showed the best prediction performance, with an Accuracy of 0.837, Precision of 0.840, Recall of 0.8366, F1 Score of 0.8368, and ROC-AUC area of 0.941. Significant clinical features for prediction included urine specific gravity, white blood cells, pH, and crystals. This paper first analyzed stone categories using a community detection algorithm and then predicted types using machine learning, providing a reference for preoperative surgical planning in urinary stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01711-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the treatment of urinary stones, surgical intervention is crucial. Urinary stones composition and type directly affect surgical planning. However, research on preoperative stone composition analysis is limited. This paper aimed to predict urinary stones types preoperatively using clinical data. Data from 1020 patients, including stone composition, clinical biochemical indicators, and demographic information, were collected. A stone composition graph network was constructed using cosine similarity, with stone composition as nodes and biochemical/demographic data as node features. The Louvain community detection algorithm was utilized to divide the network into distinct communities for the classification of stone types, with the effectiveness of the partitioning evaluated by the Modularity score. Stone types were classified, and their distribution across genders and age groups was described. Clinical feature averages were calculated for each community, and patients were assigned to the most similar community. Six machine learning algorithms (RandomForest, GradientBoosting, SVM, KNN, Logistic Regression, XGBoost) were trained to predict stone types. Model performance was evaluated, and the importance of clinical features for prediction was ranked. Six stone types were identified (Modularity = 0.828), namely common COM (Class I), COM with minor AU (Class II), COM with high UA (Class III), COM containing MAP (Class IV), high CAP-MAP (Class V), and high COM-CAP containing DCPD (Class VI). Among males, Class III and Class I were most prevalent; among females, Class V and Class III were most prevalent (χ2 = 95.066, P < 0.001). Patients with Class IV stones were significantly older than those with Class I stones (P = 0.038). GradientBoosting showed the best prediction performance, with an Accuracy of 0.837, Precision of 0.840, Recall of 0.8366, F1 Score of 0.8368, and ROC-AUC area of 0.941. Significant clinical features for prediction included urine specific gravity, white blood cells, pH, and crystals. This paper first analyzed stone categories using a community detection algorithm and then predicted types using machine learning, providing a reference for preoperative surgical planning in urinary stones.

基于社区检测的尿路结石术前分类。
在泌尿系结石的治疗中,手术干预是至关重要的。尿路结石的组成和类型直接影响手术计划。然而,术前结石成分分析的研究是有限的。本文旨在利用临床资料预测术前泌尿系结石的类型。收集1020例患者的结石组成、临床生化指标及人口学信息。利用余弦相似度,以石材成分为节点,以生物化学/人口统计学数据为节点特征,构建了石材成分图网络。利用Louvain社区检测算法将网络划分为不同的社区,对石头类型进行分类,并通过模块化评分来评估划分的有效性。对石的类型进行了分类,并描述了其在性别和年龄组中的分布。计算每个社区的临床特征平均值,并将患者分配到最相似的社区。六种机器学习算法(RandomForest, GradientBoosting, SVM, KNN, Logistic Regression, XGBoost)被训练来预测石头类型。对模型性能进行评估,并对临床特征对预测的重要性进行排序。共鉴定出6种结石类型(模块化度= 0.828),分别为普通COM (I类)、含少量AU的COM (II类)、高UA的COM (III类)、含MAP的COM (IV类)、高CAP-MAP (V类)和含DCPD的高COM- cap (VI类)。女性中以V类和III类感染率最高(χ2 = 95.066, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信