Comparative study between Hugo™ RAS and intuitive da Vinci Xi systems in different gynecologic surgeries: a single-institution perspective study.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02255-y

Kim-Seng Law

{"title":"Comparative study between Hugo™ RAS and intuitive da Vinci Xi systems in different gynecologic surgeries: a single-institution perspective study.","authors":"Kim-Seng Law","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02255-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective is to compare the feasibility, safety, and complications of the novel robot-assisted system Hugo™ RAS to the established Intuitive da Vinci Xi system in different gynecologic surgeries. This is a retrospective and propensity score-matching study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital. The participants were women with various indications for gynecologic surgery who underwent robotic procedures. The results of our first 40 cases of gynecologic procedures performed with Hugo™ RAS were compared to those of a 1:3 propensity-matched cohort using the da Vinci Xi system. Length of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, console time, and perioperative complications were the main outcome measures. There were no differences in the length of hospital stay, blood loss, and complication rates between the novel Hugo™ RAS and da Vinci Xi system in different gynecologic procedures. However, the surgical time was longer with Hugo™ RAS in the staging of endometrial cancer. The Hugo™ RAS is a feasible and safe robotic platform for different indications in gynecologic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02255-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective is to compare the feasibility, safety, and complications of the novel robot-assisted system Hugo™ RAS to the established Intuitive da Vinci Xi system in different gynecologic surgeries. This is a retrospective and propensity score-matching study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital. The participants were women with various indications for gynecologic surgery who underwent robotic procedures. The results of our first 40 cases of gynecologic procedures performed with Hugo™ RAS were compared to those of a 1:3 propensity-matched cohort using the da Vinci Xi system. Length of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, console time, and perioperative complications were the main outcome measures. There were no differences in the length of hospital stay, blood loss, and complication rates between the novel Hugo™ RAS and da Vinci Xi system in different gynecologic procedures. However, the surgical time was longer with Hugo™ RAS in the staging of endometrial cancer. The Hugo™ RAS is a feasible and safe robotic platform for different indications in gynecologic surgery.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hugo™RAS与直觉达芬奇Xi系统在不同妇科手术中的比较研究：单机构视角研究

目的是比较新型机器人辅助系统Hugo™RAS与已建立的Intuitive da Vinci Xi系统在不同妇科手术中的可行性、安全性和并发症。本研究是在某三级教学医院进行的回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。参与者是有各种妇科手术指征的妇女，她们接受了机器人手术。我们将使用Hugo™RAS进行的前40例妇科手术的结果与使用达芬奇Xi系统进行1:3倾向匹配队列的结果进行比较。住院时间、出血量、手术时间、安慰时间和围手术期并发症是主要的观察指标。在不同的妇科手术中，新型Hugo™RAS和da Vinci Xi系统在住院时间、出血量和并发症发生率方面没有差异。然而，Hugo™RAS在子宫内膜癌分期中的手术时间较长。Hugo™RAS是一种可行且安全的机器人平台，适用于妇科手术的不同适应症。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Robotic Surgery SURGERY-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

8.70%

发文量

145

期刊介绍： The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.