The role of radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in patients developing bladder cancer after prior radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy or BPH surgery.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Yannic Volz, Sarah Takayama Fouladgar, Benedikt Ebner, Philipp Weinhold, Julian Marcon, Michael Chaloupka, Christian G Stief, Gerald Schulz, Patrick Keller
{"title":"The role of radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in patients developing bladder cancer after prior radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy or BPH surgery.","authors":"Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Yannic Volz, Sarah Takayama Fouladgar, Benedikt Ebner, Philipp Weinhold, Julian Marcon, Michael Chaloupka, Christian G Stief, Gerald Schulz, Patrick Keller","doi":"10.1159/000545103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current evidence suggests that prior prostatic interventions, such as prostatectomy, radiation, or transurethral surgery may increase the risk of incontinence in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term complications, functional outcomes of neobladder reconstruction in patients undergoing RC after prior prostatic procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients who underwent RC after prior prostatic intervention in our department from 2013-2022. A comparison was made between patients receiving neobladder reconstruction (ONB) versus ileal conduit, including propensity-score-matching for age and preoperative continence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 79 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer after prior prostatic intervention. Of them, 43 (54%) patients had previously undergone BPH surgery, 29 (37%) radical prostatectomy and 7 (9%) prostate radiation therapy. An ileal conduit was performed in 62 (78%) cases. Patients presented similar baseline characteristics, perioperative complications, and quality of life after RC. Accordingly, after propensity-score-matching patients with ONB after prior prostatic intervention and patients who received ONB without prior prostatic intervention did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics, perioperative complications and quality of life. 24% of patients without prior intervention reported incontinence, compared to 53% with prior prostatic intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neobladder reconstruction remains to be a feasible option in patients undergoing RC after prior prostatic intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current evidence suggests that prior prostatic interventions, such as prostatectomy, radiation, or transurethral surgery may increase the risk of incontinence in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term complications, functional outcomes of neobladder reconstruction in patients undergoing RC after prior prostatic procedures.

Methods: We analyzed patients who underwent RC after prior prostatic intervention in our department from 2013-2022. A comparison was made between patients receiving neobladder reconstruction (ONB) versus ileal conduit, including propensity-score-matching for age and preoperative continence.

Results: We included 79 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer after prior prostatic intervention. Of them, 43 (54%) patients had previously undergone BPH surgery, 29 (37%) radical prostatectomy and 7 (9%) prostate radiation therapy. An ileal conduit was performed in 62 (78%) cases. Patients presented similar baseline characteristics, perioperative complications, and quality of life after RC. Accordingly, after propensity-score-matching patients with ONB after prior prostatic intervention and patients who received ONB without prior prostatic intervention did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics, perioperative complications and quality of life. 24% of patients without prior intervention reported incontinence, compared to 53% with prior prostatic intervention.

Conclusion: Neobladder reconstruction remains to be a feasible option in patients undergoing RC after prior prostatic intervention.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信