[The Pill Battle in psychiatry; past, present and future of the medication revolution in mental health care].

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
G Blok
{"title":"[The Pill Battle in psychiatry; past, present and future of the medication revolution in mental health care].","authors":"G Blok","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The explosive growth after 1945&nbsp;in the production and use of substances that act on the central nervous system. The possibilities for drug intervention on mood, cognition and behaviour became much greater. Meanwhile, the non-medical use of psychoactive substances also increased. Alcohol consumption tripled after 1960 and drug use increased.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Sketching the impact of these developments on the field of work of Dutch mental health care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analysis of historiography of psychotropic drug use and its broader social context; supplemented with primary source material, mainly psychiatric medication narratives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The medication revolution in mental health care led to therapeutic optimism, but also to conflict. Patients struggled with the profound physical and emotional side effects of psychotropic drugs. They also experienced problems with dependency and discontinuation of medication. Within the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s, psychiatric medication was seen as an oppression of the free individual. Practitioners struggled with patients&rsquo; lack of medication adherence and their self-medication with alcohol and drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is argued that the tension in the past and present of mental health care around the use of substances for the mind could possibly be alleviated in the future through the practice of autonomous medication management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 2","pages":"120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The explosive growth after 1945 in the production and use of substances that act on the central nervous system. The possibilities for drug intervention on mood, cognition and behaviour became much greater. Meanwhile, the non-medical use of psychoactive substances also increased. Alcohol consumption tripled after 1960 and drug use increased.

Aim: Sketching the impact of these developments on the field of work of Dutch mental health care.

Method: Analysis of historiography of psychotropic drug use and its broader social context; supplemented with primary source material, mainly psychiatric medication narratives.

Results: The medication revolution in mental health care led to therapeutic optimism, but also to conflict. Patients struggled with the profound physical and emotional side effects of psychotropic drugs. They also experienced problems with dependency and discontinuation of medication. Within the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s, psychiatric medication was seen as an oppression of the free individual. Practitioners struggled with patients’ lack of medication adherence and their self-medication with alcohol and drugs.

Conclusion: It is argued that the tension in the past and present of mental health care around the use of substances for the mind could possibly be alleviated in the future through the practice of autonomous medication management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信