Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Loris Cacciatore, Antonio Minore, Lilla Bonanno, Pierangelo Contessa, Francesco Esperto, Antonio Rosario Iannello, Rocco Papalia
{"title":"Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience.","authors":"Loris Cacciatore, Antonio Minore, Lilla Bonanno, Pierangelo Contessa, Francesco Esperto, Antonio Rosario Iannello, Rocco Papalia","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05520-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with continuous flow lithotripsy may improve stone-free rates (SFR) in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures, reducing operative time and the need for fragment extraction. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of FANS versus conventional sheaths in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January to September 2024, patients undergoing RIRS with high-power pulsed lasers (60 W Ho:YAG or 100 W pTm:YAG) were randomized to receive either a conventional sheath (Group 1) or FANS (Group 2). Data on baseline characteristics, operative details, and complications were collected. SFR, defined as the absence of fragments > 3 mm, was assessed with non-contrast CT scans one-month post-surgery. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 patients were enrolled (70 with conventional sheath, 62 with FANS). The FANS group had shorter operative times (55.25 vs. 61.36 min, p = 0.028), while laser time was similar between groups. Postoperative complications were lower in the FANS group. At one month, the FANS group had a higher SFR (95% vs. 67%, p < 0.005) and fewer re-interventions (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FANS significantly improves SFR without increasing postoperative complications postoperative complications or negatively affecting recovery, offering a promising alternative to conventional sheaths in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures. FANS improves kidney stone surgery outcomes, providing better stone removal, fewer complications, and faster recovery compared to the standard tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05520-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with continuous flow lithotripsy may improve stone-free rates (SFR) in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures, reducing operative time and the need for fragment extraction. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of FANS versus conventional sheaths in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones.

Methods: From January to September 2024, patients undergoing RIRS with high-power pulsed lasers (60 W Ho:YAG or 100 W pTm:YAG) were randomized to receive either a conventional sheath (Group 1) or FANS (Group 2). Data on baseline characteristics, operative details, and complications were collected. SFR, defined as the absence of fragments > 3 mm, was assessed with non-contrast CT scans one-month post-surgery. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 132 patients were enrolled (70 with conventional sheath, 62 with FANS). The FANS group had shorter operative times (55.25 vs. 61.36 min, p = 0.028), while laser time was similar between groups. Postoperative complications were lower in the FANS group. At one month, the FANS group had a higher SFR (95% vs. 67%, p < 0.005) and fewer re-interventions (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: FANS significantly improves SFR without increasing postoperative complications postoperative complications or negatively affecting recovery, offering a promising alternative to conventional sheaths in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures. FANS improves kidney stone surgery outcomes, providing better stone removal, fewer complications, and faster recovery compared to the standard tool.

柔性导航式输尿管吸入鞘(FANS)是否比传统的输尿管鞘更安全、更有效?意大利多中心体验。
背景与目的:柔性、可导航的吸力输尿管通路鞘(FANS)配合连续流碎石术可提高输尿管结石碎石术中的结石清除率(SFR),减少手术时间和碎片取出的需要。本研究旨在比较fan与传统鞘在肾结石逆行肾内手术(RIRS)患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:从2024年1月至9月,接受高功率脉冲激光(60 W Ho:YAG或100 W pTm:YAG) RIRS的患者随机接受常规鞘套(1组)或FANS(2组)。收集基线特征、手术细节和并发症的数据。术后1个月通过非对比CT扫描评估SFR,定义为无碎片bbb30 mm。结果:共纳入132例患者(70例采用常规护套,62例采用FANS)。fan组手术时间较短(55.25 vs. 61.36 min, p = 0.028),两组间激光时间相似。fan组术后并发症较低。1个月时,FANS组有更高的SFR (95% vs. 67%)。结论:FANS可显著改善SFR,而不会增加术后并发症或对恢复产生负面影响,为输尿管结石碎石术中常规鞘提供了一个有希望的替代方案。与标准工具相比,FANS可以改善肾结石手术结果,提供更好的结石清除,更少的并发症和更快的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信