[The organization of psychiatry in the Netherlands and Belgium: who is an example for whom?]

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
K R Goethals, T Birkenhäger
{"title":"[The organization of psychiatry in the Netherlands and Belgium: who is an example for whom?]","authors":"K R Goethals, T Birkenhäger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medical profession such as that of a psychiatrist is a profession with three essential characteristics (specialist care, autonomy and formal recognition, and professional ethics). The 21st century is characterized by bureaucratization and marketization of healthcare. Medical sociologist Friedson described three forms of logic: the logic of the professional, the logic of bureaucracy and the logic of the market.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test the position, autonomy and effectiveness of the psychiatrist from a historical perspective. To assess developments in Dutch and Belgian psychiatry and make a comparison.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two psychiatrists from Belgium and the Netherlands mention relevant developments. It is examined which form of logic is followed in these developments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logic of the professional applies to quality and further training, but is threatened by some Boards of Directors and the position of the Dutch psychiatrist. The logic of bureaucracy dominates in the new legislation on compulsory healthcare in the Netherlands. Finally, the powerful health insurers illustrate the logic of the market.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The logics of bureaucracy and the market take the upper hand in the Netherlands, to the detriment of the logic of the professional. Extensive bureaucratization and the power of health insurers are not desirable developments for Belgium. Belgians should urgently consider the options for compulsory treatment and mandatory quality and further training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 2","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The medical profession such as that of a psychiatrist is a profession with three essential characteristics (specialist care, autonomy and formal recognition, and professional ethics). The 21st century is characterized by bureaucratization and marketization of healthcare. Medical sociologist Friedson described three forms of logic: the logic of the professional, the logic of bureaucracy and the logic of the market.

Aim: To test the position, autonomy and effectiveness of the psychiatrist from a historical perspective. To assess developments in Dutch and Belgian psychiatry and make a comparison.

Method: Two psychiatrists from Belgium and the Netherlands mention relevant developments. It is examined which form of logic is followed in these developments.

Results: The logic of the professional applies to quality and further training, but is threatened by some Boards of Directors and the position of the Dutch psychiatrist. The logic of bureaucracy dominates in the new legislation on compulsory healthcare in the Netherlands. Finally, the powerful health insurers illustrate the logic of the market.

Conclusion: The logics of bureaucracy and the market take the upper hand in the Netherlands, to the detriment of the logic of the professional. Extensive bureaucratization and the power of health insurers are not desirable developments for Belgium. Belgians should urgently consider the options for compulsory treatment and mandatory quality and further training.

[荷兰和比利时的精神病学组织:谁是谁的榜样?]]
背景:像精神科医生这样的医学职业是一个具有三个基本特征的职业(专科护理、自主和正式认可以及职业道德)。21世纪的医疗保健是以官僚化和市场化为特征的。医学社会学家弗里德森描述了三种形式的逻辑:专业逻辑、官僚逻辑和市场逻辑。目的:从历史的角度考察精神科医师的地位、自主性和有效性。评估荷兰和比利时精神病学的发展并进行比较。方法:来自比利时和荷兰的两名精神病学家提及相关进展。本文考察了在这些发展中所遵循的逻辑形式。结果:专业逻辑适用于素质和继续培训,但受到一些董事会和荷兰精神科医生职位的威胁。官僚主义的逻辑在荷兰强制性医疗保健的新立法中占主导地位。最后,强大的医疗保险公司说明了市场的逻辑。结论:在荷兰,官僚主义和市场的逻辑占了上风,损害了专业人士的逻辑。广泛的官僚化和医疗保险公司的权力对比利时来说是不可取的发展。比利时人应该紧急考虑强制治疗和强制质量和进一步培训的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信