[The organization of psychiatry in the Netherlands and Belgium: who is an example for whom?]

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
K R Goethals, T Birkenhäger
{"title":"[The organization of psychiatry in the Netherlands and Belgium: who is an example for whom?]","authors":"K R Goethals, T Birkenhäger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medical profession such as that of a psychiatrist is a profession with three essential characteristics (specialist care, autonomy and formal recognition, and professional ethics). The 21st century is characterized by bureaucratization and marketization of healthcare. Medical sociologist Friedson described three forms of logic: the logic of the professional, the logic of bureaucracy and the logic of the market.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test the position, autonomy and effectiveness of the psychiatrist from a historical perspective. To assess developments in Dutch and Belgian psychiatry and make a comparison.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two psychiatrists from Belgium and the Netherlands mention relevant developments. It is examined which form of logic is followed in these developments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logic of the professional applies to quality and further training, but is threatened by some Boards of Directors and the position of the Dutch psychiatrist. The logic of bureaucracy dominates in the new legislation on compulsory healthcare in the Netherlands. Finally, the powerful health insurers illustrate the logic of the market.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The logics of bureaucracy and the market take the upper hand in the Netherlands, to the detriment of the logic of the professional. Extensive bureaucratization and the power of health insurers are not desirable developments for Belgium. Belgians should urgently consider the options for compulsory treatment and mandatory quality and further training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 2","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The medical profession such as that of a psychiatrist is a profession with three essential characteristics (specialist care, autonomy and formal recognition, and professional ethics). The 21st century is characterized by bureaucratization and marketization of healthcare. Medical sociologist Friedson described three forms of logic: the logic of the professional, the logic of bureaucracy and the logic of the market.

Aim: To test the position, autonomy and effectiveness of the psychiatrist from a historical perspective. To assess developments in Dutch and Belgian psychiatry and make a comparison.

Method: Two psychiatrists from Belgium and the Netherlands mention relevant developments. It is examined which form of logic is followed in these developments.

Results: The logic of the professional applies to quality and further training, but is threatened by some Boards of Directors and the position of the Dutch psychiatrist. The logic of bureaucracy dominates in the new legislation on compulsory healthcare in the Netherlands. Finally, the powerful health insurers illustrate the logic of the market.

Conclusion: The logics of bureaucracy and the market take the upper hand in the Netherlands, to the detriment of the logic of the professional. Extensive bureaucratization and the power of health insurers are not desirable developments for Belgium. Belgians should urgently consider the options for compulsory treatment and mandatory quality and further training.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信