A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the activity ordering task with a metacognitive facet (AOT-M).

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20240224en
Nidhi Lalu Jacob, Aysha Rooha, Anjaly S Nair, Gagan Bajaj, Vinitha Mary George, Jayashree S Bhat
{"title":"A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the activity ordering task with a metacognitive facet (AOT-M).","authors":"Nidhi Lalu Jacob, Aysha Rooha, Anjaly S Nair, Gagan Bajaj, Vinitha Mary George, Jayashree S Bhat","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240224en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Activity Ordering Task with a metacognitive facet (AOT-M) was developed, in our previous work, to address the disconnect between traditional working memory (WM) tasks and everyday WM demands, the lack of culturally sensitive, context-based WM tasks in India and enhance participant engagement. The present study aims to provide preliminary evidence of the AOT-M's psychometric properties among a non-clinical adult population, evaluate its sensitivity to cognitive and metacognitive changes with aging, establish construct validity, ecological validity, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety neurotypical adults, evenly distributed across three age groups, participated in the study. Descriptive statistics examined the distribution of performance spans and estimation discrepancies across age groups and the age-related statistical differences were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. Construct validity was assessed using Rasch analysis, while ecological validity was evaluated with the Multidimensional Assessment of Research in Context (MARC) tool. Concurrent validity with sentence ordering and digit letter ordering tasks, was determined through Pearson's correlation coefficient and test-retest reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patterns observed in WM performance spans and estimation discrepancies highlighted the task's sensitivity to aging related cognitive and metacognitive changes. Evidence from the MARC tool substantiated ecological validity, and concurrent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations with established WM tasks. While Rasch analysis supported construct validity, moderate person reliability indicated some limitations in task sensitivity. The AOT-M demonstrated good test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the study provides preliminary evidence of the AOT-M's good psychometric properties within a neurotypical adult sample, suggesting it to be a promising addition to the cognitive communicative toolbox for Speech Language Pathologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 3","pages":"e20240224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240224en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Activity Ordering Task with a metacognitive facet (AOT-M) was developed, in our previous work, to address the disconnect between traditional working memory (WM) tasks and everyday WM demands, the lack of culturally sensitive, context-based WM tasks in India and enhance participant engagement. The present study aims to provide preliminary evidence of the AOT-M's psychometric properties among a non-clinical adult population, evaluate its sensitivity to cognitive and metacognitive changes with aging, establish construct validity, ecological validity, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability.

Methods: Ninety neurotypical adults, evenly distributed across three age groups, participated in the study. Descriptive statistics examined the distribution of performance spans and estimation discrepancies across age groups and the age-related statistical differences were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. Construct validity was assessed using Rasch analysis, while ecological validity was evaluated with the Multidimensional Assessment of Research in Context (MARC) tool. Concurrent validity with sentence ordering and digit letter ordering tasks, was determined through Pearson's correlation coefficient and test-retest reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: The patterns observed in WM performance spans and estimation discrepancies highlighted the task's sensitivity to aging related cognitive and metacognitive changes. Evidence from the MARC tool substantiated ecological validity, and concurrent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations with established WM tasks. While Rasch analysis supported construct validity, moderate person reliability indicated some limitations in task sensitivity. The AOT-M demonstrated good test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: Overall, the study provides preliminary evidence of the AOT-M's good psychometric properties within a neurotypical adult sample, suggesting it to be a promising addition to the cognitive communicative toolbox for Speech Language Pathologists.

带元认知面的活动排序任务(AOT-M)的初步心理测量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信