An indication-based analysis of the yield and findings of esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Abstract

Background: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. While studies have previously reported on HRM findings in patients with dysphagia and/or chest pain, we sought to compare the yield and findings of HRM based on different indications for motility testing.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed including all successful HRM studies performed at two tertiary medical centers between 2018 and 2023. The indication was categorized as either: (1) dysphagia; (2) GERD evaluation; (3) non-cardiac chest pain; (4) epigastric pain; (5) regurgitation/vomiting; or (6) prior to esophageal surgery. Motility disorders were diagnosed as per the Chicago Classification, version 4.0.

Results: A total of 768 patients were included (mean age 55.5 +/- 17.3; 56.2% female). The most common indications were dysphagia (368, 47.9%) and prior to reflux testing (267, 34.8%). Normal motility was found in 417 (54.3%) patients while a motility disorder was diagnosed in 351 (45.7%) subjects. A major motility disorder was found in 178 (23.2%) cases, with achalasia in 82 (10.7%) patients. HRM diagnoses significantly differed based on the indication for testing (p < 0.001), with major motility disorders and achalasia being most commonly diagnosed when performed for dysphagia and recurrent regurgitation/vomiting. The indication affected the likelihood of having any motility disorder (p = 0.010), a major motility disorder (p < 0.001), a disorder of EGJ Outflow (p < 0.001), and achalasia (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The indication for HRM testing affects the likelihood of having a motility disorder including achalasia. The highest yield is in patients being evaluated for dysphagia and regurgitation/vomiting.