Ashleigh J Rich, Emma L McGorray, Dylan Felt, Maddie Kerr, Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle, Lauren B Beach, Gregory Phillips, Tonia Poteat
{"title":"Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity Measurement in Health Research: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.","authors":"Ashleigh J Rich, Emma L McGorray, Dylan Felt, Maddie Kerr, Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle, Lauren B Beach, Gregory Phillips, Tonia Poteat","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Toward the goal of developing standardized sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) measures that can be used across demographics and regions, this review aimed to synthesize and summarize how SSOGI have been assessed within health research, including the quality and validity of these measures. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed research developing or evaluating SSOGI measures in PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments bibliographic databases. Eligible studies reported original peer-reviewed research focused on SSOGI measurement in adult populations in the United States from 2012 through June 7, 2022. In consultation with librarians, search results were screened for inclusion using an innovative multiple-phase method of stratification, supervised clustering, and supervised machine learning. We conducted manual screening and data extraction in Covidence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 17,814 citations were returned from all databases, with 30 studies eligible for final inclusion in the review. Gender identity measurement was the focus of half of the included studies (51%), followed by sexual orientation (40%), with little asexuality-specific measurement research (<i>n</i> = 1 study), and beyond sexual orientation, research on sex or variations in sexual characteristics (<i>n</i> = 1 study, each). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although the field of sexual and gender minority health research has grown exponentially over the past decade, there remains a dearth of literature focused on the development and evaluation of SSOGI measures. We found heterogeneity across the SSOGI measurement literature including by study design, sampling strategy, and study population. Important identified gaps include the need for attention to the measurement of sex, variations in sex characteristics, and asexuality-inclusive sexual orientation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Toward the goal of developing standardized sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) measures that can be used across demographics and regions, this review aimed to synthesize and summarize how SSOGI have been assessed within health research, including the quality and validity of these measures. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed research developing or evaluating SSOGI measures in PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments bibliographic databases. Eligible studies reported original peer-reviewed research focused on SSOGI measurement in adult populations in the United States from 2012 through June 7, 2022. In consultation with librarians, search results were screened for inclusion using an innovative multiple-phase method of stratification, supervised clustering, and supervised machine learning. We conducted manual screening and data extraction in Covidence. Results: In total, 17,814 citations were returned from all databases, with 30 studies eligible for final inclusion in the review. Gender identity measurement was the focus of half of the included studies (51%), followed by sexual orientation (40%), with little asexuality-specific measurement research (n = 1 study), and beyond sexual orientation, research on sex or variations in sexual characteristics (n = 1 study, each). Conclusions: Although the field of sexual and gender minority health research has grown exponentially over the past decade, there remains a dearth of literature focused on the development and evaluation of SSOGI measures. We found heterogeneity across the SSOGI measurement literature including by study design, sampling strategy, and study population. Important identified gaps include the need for attention to the measurement of sex, variations in sex characteristics, and asexuality-inclusive sexual orientation measures.
LGBT healthPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍:
LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.