Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity Measurement in Health Research: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
LGBT health Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1089/lgbt.2024.0105
Ashleigh J Rich, Emma L McGorray, Dylan Felt, Maddie Kerr, Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle, Lauren B Beach, Gregory Phillips, Tonia Poteat
{"title":"Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity Measurement in Health Research: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.","authors":"Ashleigh J Rich, Emma L McGorray, Dylan Felt, Maddie Kerr, Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle, Lauren B Beach, Gregory Phillips, Tonia Poteat","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Toward the goal of developing standardized sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) measures that can be used across demographics and regions, this review aimed to synthesize and summarize how SSOGI have been assessed within health research, including the quality and validity of these measures. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed research developing or evaluating SSOGI measures in PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments bibliographic databases. Eligible studies reported original peer-reviewed research focused on SSOGI measurement in adult populations in the United States from 2012 through June 7, 2022. In consultation with librarians, search results were screened for inclusion using an innovative multiple-phase method of stratification, supervised clustering, and supervised machine learning. We conducted manual screening and data extraction in Covidence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 17,814 citations were returned from all databases, with 30 studies eligible for final inclusion in the review. Gender identity measurement was the focus of half of the included studies (51%), followed by sexual orientation (40%), with little asexuality-specific measurement research (<i>n</i> = 1 study), and beyond sexual orientation, research on sex or variations in sexual characteristics (<i>n</i> = 1 study, each). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although the field of sexual and gender minority health research has grown exponentially over the past decade, there remains a dearth of literature focused on the development and evaluation of SSOGI measures. We found heterogeneity across the SSOGI measurement literature including by study design, sampling strategy, and study population. Important identified gaps include the need for attention to the measurement of sex, variations in sex characteristics, and asexuality-inclusive sexual orientation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Toward the goal of developing standardized sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity (SSOGI) measures that can be used across demographics and regions, this review aimed to synthesize and summarize how SSOGI have been assessed within health research, including the quality and validity of these measures. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed research developing or evaluating SSOGI measures in PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments bibliographic databases. Eligible studies reported original peer-reviewed research focused on SSOGI measurement in adult populations in the United States from 2012 through June 7, 2022. In consultation with librarians, search results were screened for inclusion using an innovative multiple-phase method of stratification, supervised clustering, and supervised machine learning. We conducted manual screening and data extraction in Covidence. Results: In total, 17,814 citations were returned from all databases, with 30 studies eligible for final inclusion in the review. Gender identity measurement was the focus of half of the included studies (51%), followed by sexual orientation (40%), with little asexuality-specific measurement research (n = 1 study), and beyond sexual orientation, research on sex or variations in sexual characteristics (n = 1 study, each). Conclusions: Although the field of sexual and gender minority health research has grown exponentially over the past decade, there remains a dearth of literature focused on the development and evaluation of SSOGI measures. We found heterogeneity across the SSOGI measurement literature including by study design, sampling strategy, and study population. Important identified gaps include the need for attention to the measurement of sex, variations in sex characteristics, and asexuality-inclusive sexual orientation measures.

健康研究中的性别、性取向和性别认同测量:系统回顾和叙事综合。
目的:为了开发可跨人口统计学和地区使用的标准化性、性取向和性别认同(SSOGI)指标,本综述旨在综合和总结健康研究中如何评估SSOGI,包括这些指标的质量和有效性。方法:我们对PubMed、PsycInfo、CINAHL和健康与社会心理工具书目数据库中开发或评估SSOGI测量方法的同行评议研究进行了系统综述。符合条件的研究报告了2012年至2022年6月7日期间美国成年人SSOGI测量的原始同行评议研究。在与图书馆员协商后,使用创新的多阶段分层、监督聚类和监督机器学习方法筛选搜索结果以纳入。我们在疫情期间进行了人工筛选和数据提取。结果:从所有数据库中共返回17,814条引文,其中30项研究符合最终纳入综述的条件。性别认同测量是纳入研究的一半(51%),其次是性取向(40%),很少有针对无性恋的测量研究(n = 1项研究),除了性取向,还有关于性或性特征变化的研究(各n = 1项研究)。结论:尽管在过去十年中,性和性别少数群体健康研究领域呈指数级增长,但关于SSOGI措施的开发和评估的文献仍然缺乏。我们发现SSOGI测量文献的异质性,包括研究设计、抽样策略和研究人群。已确定的重要差距包括需要注意性别的测量、性特征的变化和无性取向包容的性取向测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LGBT health
LGBT health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信