Pharmacokinetics of two pharmaceutical presentations of benznidazole in adult Trypanosoma cruzi infected population.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0074-02760240177
Yolanda Hernández, María Elena Marson, Marisa Liliana Fernández, Omar Sued, Claudia Frola, Santiago Perez Lloret, Pedro Cahn, Nilda Graciela Prado, Guido Enrique Mastrantonio Garrido, Sergio Sosa-Estani
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics of two pharmaceutical presentations of benznidazole in adult Trypanosoma cruzi infected population.","authors":"Yolanda Hernández, María Elena Marson, Marisa Liliana Fernández, Omar Sued, Claudia Frola, Santiago Perez Lloret, Pedro Cahn, Nilda Graciela Prado, Guido Enrique Mastrantonio Garrido, Sergio Sosa-Estani","doi":"10.1590/0074-02760240177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benznidazole (BNZ) is the primary treatment for Chagas disease. While pharmacokinetic studies of BNZ began in the 1970s, its metabolism and excretion are not fully understood. Alternatives like Benznidazol Lafepe® and Abarax® have replaced the original Radanil®.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of both currently available formulations of BNZ in adults with chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 13 subjects each one receiving 100 mg of both presentations one week apart. Blood samples were collected over 48 hours post-administration to analyse BNZ concentration and calculate pharmacokinetic parameters.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The analysis showed that both presentations had similar maximum plasma concentration and time to reach maximum plasma concentration values. Area under curve (AUC) values were slightly lower in Abarax® than Benznidazol Lafepe®. High intra-individual variability was observed, attributed to erratic absorption patterns with multiple peaks in concentration-time curves. The half-life values for both formulations were 9.1 and 8.0 h, respectively, with a significant intra-individual variability over 30%.</p><p><strong>Main conclusions: </strong>The mean difference in the AUC was lower than 10%, but exceeded the 90% confidence interval for the higher bioequivalence limit. Despite the high variability that confirms erratic absorption, the pharmacokinetic parameters of both formulations were within expected ranges.</p>","PeriodicalId":18469,"journal":{"name":"Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz","volume":"120 ","pages":"e240177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760240177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benznidazole (BNZ) is the primary treatment for Chagas disease. While pharmacokinetic studies of BNZ began in the 1970s, its metabolism and excretion are not fully understood. Alternatives like Benznidazol Lafepe® and Abarax® have replaced the original Radanil®.

Objectives: To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of both currently available formulations of BNZ in adults with chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection.

Methods: The study involved 13 subjects each one receiving 100 mg of both presentations one week apart. Blood samples were collected over 48 hours post-administration to analyse BNZ concentration and calculate pharmacokinetic parameters.

Findings: The analysis showed that both presentations had similar maximum plasma concentration and time to reach maximum plasma concentration values. Area under curve (AUC) values were slightly lower in Abarax® than Benznidazol Lafepe®. High intra-individual variability was observed, attributed to erratic absorption patterns with multiple peaks in concentration-time curves. The half-life values for both formulations were 9.1 and 8.0 h, respectively, with a significant intra-individual variability over 30%.

Main conclusions: The mean difference in the AUC was lower than 10%, but exceeded the 90% confidence interval for the higher bioequivalence limit. Despite the high variability that confirms erratic absorption, the pharmacokinetic parameters of both formulations were within expected ranges.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz is a journal specialized in microbes & their vectors causing human infections. This means that we accept manuscripts covering multidisciplinary approaches and findings in the basic aspects of infectious diseases, e.g. basic in research in prokariotes, eukaryotes, and/or virus. Articles must clearly show what is the main question to be answered, the hypothesis raised, and the contribution given by the study. Priority is given to manuscripts reporting novel mechanisms and general findings concerning the biology of human infectious prokariotes, eukariotes or virus. Papers reporting innovative methods for diagnostics or that advance the basic research with these infectious agents are also welcome. It is important to mention what we do not publish: veterinary infectious agents research, taxonomic analysis and re-description of species, epidemiological studies or surveys or case reports and data re-analysis. Manuscripts that fall in these cases or that are considered of low priority by the journal editorial board, will be returned to the author(s) for submission to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信