Evaluation of Software-Optimized Protocols for Acoustic Noise Reduction During Brain MRI at 7 Tesla.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anton Glans, Linda Wennberg, Jonna Wilén, Lenita Lindgren, Pia C Sundgren, Johan Mårtensson, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Boel Hansson
{"title":"Evaluation of Software-Optimized Protocols for Acoustic Noise Reduction During Brain MRI at 7 Tesla.","authors":"Anton Glans, Linda Wennberg, Jonna Wilén, Lenita Lindgren, Pia C Sundgren, Johan Mårtensson, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Boel Hansson","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MR-generated acoustic noise may be particularly concerning at 7-Tesla (T) systems. Noise levels can be reduced by altering gradient output using software optimization. However, such alterations might influence image quality or prolong scan times, and these optimizations have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate image quality, sound pressure levels (SPLs), and perceived noise levels when using the acoustic noise reduction technique SofTone for T<sub>2</sub>-weighted fast spin echo (T<sub>2</sub>W FSE) and three-dimensional T<sub>1</sub>-weighted turbo field echo (3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE), and to compare with conventional imaging during 7-T brain MRI.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Twenty-eight volunteers underwent brain MRI, with n = 26 for image quality evaluations.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>Conventional and SofTone versions of T<sub>2</sub>W FSE and 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE at 7 T.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Peak SPLs (A-weighted decibels, dBA), participant-perceived noise levels (Borg CR10-scale), qualitative image assessments by three neuroradiologists (four-graded ordinal scales), interrater reliability, and percentage agreement.</p><p><strong>Statistical test: </strong>Paired t-test, Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test, and Krippendorff's alpha; p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SofTone significantly reduced peak SPLs: from 116.3 to 97.0 dBA on T<sub>2</sub>W FSE, and from 123.7 to 101.5 dBA on 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE. SofTone was perceived as significantly quieter than conventional scanning. T<sub>2</sub>W FSE showed no significant differences in image quality assessments (p = 0.21-1.00), except one radiologist noting significantly less artifact interference with SofTone. General image quality remained acceptable for 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE, though one radiologist scored it significantly lower with SofTone (mean scores: 3.08 vs. 3.65), and two radiologists observed significantly worse white and gray matter differentiation with SofTone (mean scores: 3.19 vs. 3.54; 2.27 vs. 2.81).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>SofTone can significantly reduce sound intensity and perceived noise levels while maintaining acceptable image quality with T<sub>2</sub>W FSE and 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE in brain MRI. It appears to be an effective tool for providing a safer, quieter 7-T scan environment.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MR-generated acoustic noise may be particularly concerning at 7-Tesla (T) systems. Noise levels can be reduced by altering gradient output using software optimization. However, such alterations might influence image quality or prolong scan times, and these optimizations have not been well characterized.

Purpose: To evaluate image quality, sound pressure levels (SPLs), and perceived noise levels when using the acoustic noise reduction technique SofTone for T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2W FSE) and three-dimensional T1-weighted turbo field echo (3D T1W TFE), and to compare with conventional imaging during 7-T brain MRI.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects: Twenty-eight volunteers underwent brain MRI, with n = 26 for image quality evaluations.

Field strength/sequence: Conventional and SofTone versions of T2W FSE and 3D T1W TFE at 7 T.

Assessment: Peak SPLs (A-weighted decibels, dBA), participant-perceived noise levels (Borg CR10-scale), qualitative image assessments by three neuroradiologists (four-graded ordinal scales), interrater reliability, and percentage agreement.

Statistical test: Paired t-test, Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test, and Krippendorff's alpha; p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: SofTone significantly reduced peak SPLs: from 116.3 to 97.0 dBA on T2W FSE, and from 123.7 to 101.5 dBA on 3D T1W TFE. SofTone was perceived as significantly quieter than conventional scanning. T2W FSE showed no significant differences in image quality assessments (p = 0.21-1.00), except one radiologist noting significantly less artifact interference with SofTone. General image quality remained acceptable for 3D T1W TFE, though one radiologist scored it significantly lower with SofTone (mean scores: 3.08 vs. 3.65), and two radiologists observed significantly worse white and gray matter differentiation with SofTone (mean scores: 3.19 vs. 3.54; 2.27 vs. 2.81).

Data conclusion: SofTone can significantly reduce sound intensity and perceived noise levels while maintaining acceptable image quality with T2W FSE and 3D T1W TFE in brain MRI. It appears to be an effective tool for providing a safer, quieter 7-T scan environment.

Evidence level: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.

7特斯拉时脑MRI降噪软件优化方案的评价。
背景:在7-特斯拉(T)系统中,mr产生的声学噪声可能特别令人担忧。噪声水平可以通过使用软件优化改变梯度输出来降低。然而,这样的改变可能会影响图像质量或延长扫描时间,而且这些优化还没有得到很好的表征。目的:评价采用降噪技术SofTone对t2加权快速自旋回波(T2W FSE)和三维t1加权涡轮场回波(3D T1W TFE)成像的图像质量、声压级(SPLs)和感知噪声水平,并与常规7-T脑MRI成像进行比较。研究类型:前瞻性。受试者:28名志愿者接受了脑部核磁共振成像,其中26名进行了图像质量评估。场强/序列:T2W FSE和3D T1W TFE在7 t时的常规和softtone版本。评估:峰值SPLs (a加权分贝,dBA),参与者感知的噪声水平(Borg cr10量表),三位神经放射科医生的定性图像评估(四级有序量表),相互可靠性和百分比一致性。统计检验:配对t检验、Wilcoxon’s Signed-Rank检验、Krippendorff’s alpha检验;p结果:SofTone显著降低峰值声压:在T2W FSE上从116.3到97.0 dBA,在3D T1W TFE上从123.7到101.5 dBA。软音被认为比传统扫描安静得多。T2W FSE在图像质量评估方面没有显着差异(p = 0.21-1.00),除了一位放射科医生注意到SofTone明显减少了伪影干扰。3D T1W TFE的总体图像质量仍然可以接受,尽管一位放射科医生使用SofTone评分明显较低(平均评分:3.08比3.65),两位放射科医生使用SofTone观察到白质和灰质分化明显较差(平均评分:3.19比3.54;2.27 vs. 2.81)。数据结论:软通可显著降低脑MRI T2W FSE和3D T1W TFE的声强和感知噪声水平,同时保持可接受的图像质量。它似乎是提供更安全,更安静的7-T扫描环境的有效工具。证据等级:4技术功效:第5阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信