Evaluation of Software-Optimized Protocols for Acoustic Noise Reduction During Brain MRI at 7 Tesla.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anton Glans, Linda Wennberg, Jonna Wilén, Lenita Lindgren, Pia C Sundgren, Johan Mårtensson, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Boel Hansson
{"title":"Evaluation of Software-Optimized Protocols for Acoustic Noise Reduction During Brain MRI at 7 Tesla.","authors":"Anton Glans, Linda Wennberg, Jonna Wilén, Lenita Lindgren, Pia C Sundgren, Johan Mårtensson, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Boel Hansson","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MR-generated acoustic noise may be particularly concerning at 7-Tesla (T) systems. Noise levels can be reduced by altering gradient output using software optimization. However, such alterations might influence image quality or prolong scan times, and these optimizations have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate image quality, sound pressure levels (SPLs), and perceived noise levels when using the acoustic noise reduction technique SofTone for T<sub>2</sub>-weighted fast spin echo (T<sub>2</sub>W FSE) and three-dimensional T<sub>1</sub>-weighted turbo field echo (3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE), and to compare with conventional imaging during 7-T brain MRI.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Twenty-eight volunteers underwent brain MRI, with n = 26 for image quality evaluations.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>Conventional and SofTone versions of T<sub>2</sub>W FSE and 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE at 7 T.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Peak SPLs (A-weighted decibels, dBA), participant-perceived noise levels (Borg CR10-scale), qualitative image assessments by three neuroradiologists (four-graded ordinal scales), interrater reliability, and percentage agreement.</p><p><strong>Statistical test: </strong>Paired t-test, Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test, and Krippendorff's alpha; p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SofTone significantly reduced peak SPLs: from 116.3 to 97.0 dBA on T<sub>2</sub>W FSE, and from 123.7 to 101.5 dBA on 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE. SofTone was perceived as significantly quieter than conventional scanning. T<sub>2</sub>W FSE showed no significant differences in image quality assessments (p = 0.21-1.00), except one radiologist noting significantly less artifact interference with SofTone. General image quality remained acceptable for 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE, though one radiologist scored it significantly lower with SofTone (mean scores: 3.08 vs. 3.65), and two radiologists observed significantly worse white and gray matter differentiation with SofTone (mean scores: 3.19 vs. 3.54; 2.27 vs. 2.81).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>SofTone can significantly reduce sound intensity and perceived noise levels while maintaining acceptable image quality with T<sub>2</sub>W FSE and 3D T<sub>1</sub>W TFE in brain MRI. It appears to be an effective tool for providing a safer, quieter 7-T scan environment.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MR-generated acoustic noise may be particularly concerning at 7-Tesla (T) systems. Noise levels can be reduced by altering gradient output using software optimization. However, such alterations might influence image quality or prolong scan times, and these optimizations have not been well characterized.

Purpose: To evaluate image quality, sound pressure levels (SPLs), and perceived noise levels when using the acoustic noise reduction technique SofTone for T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2W FSE) and three-dimensional T1-weighted turbo field echo (3D T1W TFE), and to compare with conventional imaging during 7-T brain MRI.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects: Twenty-eight volunteers underwent brain MRI, with n = 26 for image quality evaluations.

Field strength/sequence: Conventional and SofTone versions of T2W FSE and 3D T1W TFE at 7 T.

Assessment: Peak SPLs (A-weighted decibels, dBA), participant-perceived noise levels (Borg CR10-scale), qualitative image assessments by three neuroradiologists (four-graded ordinal scales), interrater reliability, and percentage agreement.

Statistical test: Paired t-test, Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test, and Krippendorff's alpha; p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: SofTone significantly reduced peak SPLs: from 116.3 to 97.0 dBA on T2W FSE, and from 123.7 to 101.5 dBA on 3D T1W TFE. SofTone was perceived as significantly quieter than conventional scanning. T2W FSE showed no significant differences in image quality assessments (p = 0.21-1.00), except one radiologist noting significantly less artifact interference with SofTone. General image quality remained acceptable for 3D T1W TFE, though one radiologist scored it significantly lower with SofTone (mean scores: 3.08 vs. 3.65), and two radiologists observed significantly worse white and gray matter differentiation with SofTone (mean scores: 3.19 vs. 3.54; 2.27 vs. 2.81).

Data conclusion: SofTone can significantly reduce sound intensity and perceived noise levels while maintaining acceptable image quality with T2W FSE and 3D T1W TFE in brain MRI. It appears to be an effective tool for providing a safer, quieter 7-T scan environment.

Evidence level: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信