Reliability of Self-Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure With iCare Home2 Rebound Tonometry.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002560
Dario Romano, Giovanni Montesano, Amir A Aminoleslami, Benedetta Colizzi, Luca M Rossetti
{"title":"Reliability of Self-Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure With iCare Home2 Rebound Tonometry.","authors":"Dario Romano, Giovanni Montesano, Amir A Aminoleslami, Benedetta Colizzi, Luca M Rossetti","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Using iCare Home2 (iCare, Finland) rebound tonometry, self-measurement of intraocular pressure has demonstrated good reliability and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the reliability and repeatability of self-measured intraocular pressure (IOP) with rebound tonometry using iCare Home2.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>One hundred four patients out of 110 consecutive patients were recruited for this observational cross-sectional study. One randomly selected eye from each patient underwent 6 consecutive IOP measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), iCare IC200, and iCare Home2. Every eye was tested twice with each device, in random order, by an ophthalmologist for GAT and IC200, and by the patient itself for Home2. In addition, central corneal thickness (CCT) has been collected. The reliability of Home2 has been tested by calculating limits of agreement (LoA) between self-measured and physician-measured IOP, using the Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of each device has been tested by calculating the limits of repeatability (LoR) with the same method. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between differences in IOP measurements and CCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference between GAT and iCare Home2 was -0.28±1.57 mmHg ( P =0.070), 95%-LoA: (-3.36 to 2.79 mmHg). The mean difference between IC200 and iCare Home2 was 0.92±1.48 mmHg ( P <0.0001), 95%-LoA (-1.98 to 3.82 mmHg). The mean difference between the first and second measurements with GAT, iCare IC200, and iCare Home2 measurements was 0.21±0.98 mmHg ( P =0.03), -0.02±1.11 mmHg ( P =0.88) and -0.23±1.04 mmHg ( P =0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-measured IOP with rebound tonometry showed good reliability and repeatability when compared with physician-measured IOP with both standard GAT and rebound tonometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"447-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: Using iCare Home2 (iCare, Finland) rebound tonometry, self-measurement of intraocular pressure has demonstrated good reliability and ease of use.

Purpose: To investigate the reliability and repeatability of self-measured intraocular pressure (IOP) with rebound tonometry using iCare Home2.

Patients and methods: One hundred four patients out of 110 consecutive patients were recruited for this observational cross-sectional study. One randomly selected eye from each patient underwent 6 consecutive IOP measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), iCare IC200, and iCare Home2. Every eye was tested twice with each device, in random order, by an ophthalmologist for GAT and IC200, and by the patient itself for Home2. In addition, central corneal thickness (CCT) has been collected. The reliability of Home2 has been tested by calculating limits of agreement (LoA) between self-measured and physician-measured IOP, using the Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of each device has been tested by calculating the limits of repeatability (LoR) with the same method. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between differences in IOP measurements and CCT.

Results: The mean difference between GAT and iCare Home2 was -0.28±1.57 mmHg ( P =0.070), 95%-LoA: (-3.36 to 2.79 mmHg). The mean difference between IC200 and iCare Home2 was 0.92±1.48 mmHg ( P <0.0001), 95%-LoA (-1.98 to 3.82 mmHg). The mean difference between the first and second measurements with GAT, iCare IC200, and iCare Home2 measurements was 0.21±0.98 mmHg ( P =0.03), -0.02±1.11 mmHg ( P =0.88) and -0.23±1.04 mmHg ( P =0.05).

Conclusions: Self-measured IOP with rebound tonometry showed good reliability and repeatability when compared with physician-measured IOP with both standard GAT and rebound tonometry.

iCare Home2反跳眼压计自我监测眼压的可靠性。
应用iCare Home2 (iCare, Finland)回弹式眼压计,自测眼压具有良好的可靠性和易用性。目的:探讨iCare Home2反跳眼压法自测眼压的可靠性和可重复性。患者和方法:从110例连续患者中招募了104例患者参加这项观察性横断面研究。每位患者随机选择一只眼,使用Goldmann眼压计(GAT)、iCare IC200和iCare Home2连续进行6次IOP测量。每只眼睛都用每种设备随机测试两次,由眼科医生进行GAT和IC200测试,由患者自己进行Home2测试。同时采集角膜中央厚度(CCT)。使用Bland-Altman分析,计算自我测量和医生测量的IOP之间的一致限(LoA),对Home2的可靠性进行了测试。用同样的方法计算可重复性限(LoR),测试了每个设备的可重复性。使用Pearson相关系数确定IOP测量值差异与CCT之间的相关性。结果:GAT与iCare Home2的平均差异为-0.28±1.57 mm Hg (P=0.070), 95%-LoA: [-3.36, 2,79 mm Hg]。IC200与iCare Home2的平均差值为0.92±1.48 mm Hg (p)。结论:与采用标准GAT和回弹眼压法的医师测眼压相比,自行测眼压具有良好的可靠性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信