Orthopedic frailty risk stratification (OFRS): a systematic review of the frailty indices predicting adverse outcomes in orthopedics.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nithin K Gupta, Forrest Dunivin, Hikmat R Chmait, Chase Smitterberg, Azhaan Buttar, Moiz Fazal-Ur-Rehman, Taylor Manes, Morgan Turnow, Tyler K Williamson, Benjamin C Taylor, Jack W Weick, Christian Bowers
{"title":"Orthopedic frailty risk stratification (OFRS): a systematic review of the frailty indices predicting adverse outcomes in orthopedics.","authors":"Nithin K Gupta, Forrest Dunivin, Hikmat R Chmait, Chase Smitterberg, Azhaan Buttar, Moiz Fazal-Ur-Rehman, Taylor Manes, Morgan Turnow, Tyler K Williamson, Benjamin C Taylor, Jack W Weick, Christian Bowers","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05609-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a growing number of elderly patients requiring elective and non-elective procedures, frailty-based preoperative risk stratification is an emerging tool in orthopedic surgery to minimize adverse postoperative outcomes. This paper sought to understand the current literature regarding preoperative Orthopedic Frailty Risk Stratification (OFRS) and describe the disparate frailty indices and their capabilities for discrimination in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane, and Scopus for articles published during or prior to February 2024 assessing frailty following surgery for orthopedic pathologies. Qualitative variables including study characteristics and application of frailty were collected and synthesized. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed for pooled odds ratio (OR) and area under the curve (AUC) of frailty for mortality and complications. All methods were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 included articles, over half (52%) addressed traumatic orthopedic pathologies with traumatic hip fractures being the most studied in the OFRS (25 studies). Less common categories included oncology, sports, and foot/ankle. Functional status and independence were the most common frailty domain (25, 96.2%) and component across scales (20, 76.9%), respectively. The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) was the most common frailty index (28 publications). Meta-analysis demonstrated increasing frailty was an independent predictor of mortality (30-day OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 2.00-4.18; 1 year OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.48-2.22, p < 0.001), major complications (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10-2.41, p = 0.02), and Clavien-Dindo IV complications (OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 2.18-4.87, p < 0.001). Frailty had good discriminatory accuracy for predicting mortality at 30-days (AUC: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68-0.74, p < 0.001), 3-months (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.83, p < 0.001), and 1-year (OR:0.74, 95% CI: 0.73-0.75, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The orthopedic surgery frailty literature is extremely heterogeneous, with disparate frailty scales implemented to measure varying outcomes across many orthopedic pathologies. Despite no consensus on exact scales or definitions, various frailty indices have predicted adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05609-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With a growing number of elderly patients requiring elective and non-elective procedures, frailty-based preoperative risk stratification is an emerging tool in orthopedic surgery to minimize adverse postoperative outcomes. This paper sought to understand the current literature regarding preoperative Orthopedic Frailty Risk Stratification (OFRS) and describe the disparate frailty indices and their capabilities for discrimination in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane, and Scopus for articles published during or prior to February 2024 assessing frailty following surgery for orthopedic pathologies. Qualitative variables including study characteristics and application of frailty were collected and synthesized. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed for pooled odds ratio (OR) and area under the curve (AUC) of frailty for mortality and complications. All methods were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

Results: Of the 81 included articles, over half (52%) addressed traumatic orthopedic pathologies with traumatic hip fractures being the most studied in the OFRS (25 studies). Less common categories included oncology, sports, and foot/ankle. Functional status and independence were the most common frailty domain (25, 96.2%) and component across scales (20, 76.9%), respectively. The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) was the most common frailty index (28 publications). Meta-analysis demonstrated increasing frailty was an independent predictor of mortality (30-day OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 2.00-4.18; 1 year OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.48-2.22, p < 0.001), major complications (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10-2.41, p = 0.02), and Clavien-Dindo IV complications (OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 2.18-4.87, p < 0.001). Frailty had good discriminatory accuracy for predicting mortality at 30-days (AUC: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68-0.74, p < 0.001), 3-months (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.83, p < 0.001), and 1-year (OR:0.74, 95% CI: 0.73-0.75, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The orthopedic surgery frailty literature is extremely heterogeneous, with disparate frailty scales implemented to measure varying outcomes across many orthopedic pathologies. Despite no consensus on exact scales or definitions, various frailty indices have predicted adverse outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信