Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.684
Hannah G Lane, Sallie D Allgood, Julie Schexnayder, Hayden B Bosworth, Ana A Baumann, Allison A Lewinski
{"title":"Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.","authors":"Hannah G Lane, Sallie D Allgood, Julie Schexnayder, Hayden B Bosworth, Ana A Baumann, Allison A Lewinski","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dissemination and implementation (D&I) scientists are key members of collaborative, interdisciplinary clinical and translational research teams. Yet, early career D&I researchers (ECRs) have few guidelines for cultivating productive research collaborations. We developed recommendations for ECRs in D&I when serving as collaborators or co-investigators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a consensus-building approach: (1) group discussions to identify 3 areas of interest: \"Marketing yourself\" (describing your value to non-D&I collaborators), \"Collaboration considerations<i>\"</i> (contributions during proposal development), and \"Responsibilities following project initiation\" (defining your role throughout projects); (2) first survey and focus groups to iteratively rank/refine sub-domains within each area; (3) second survey and expert input on clarity/content of sub-domains; and (4) iterative development of key recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four D&I researchers completed the first survey, 12 of whom attended one of three focus groups. Twenty-nine D&I researchers completed the second survey (<i>n</i> = 29) and 10 experts provided input. We identified 25 recommendations. Findings suggest unique collaboration strengths (e.g, partnership-building) and challenges (e.g., unclear link to career milestones) for ECR D&I researchers, and underscore the value of ongoing training and mentorship for ECRs and the need to intersect collaborative D&I efforts with health equity principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research collaborations are essential in clinical and translational research. We identified recommendations for D&I ECRs to be productive research collaborators, including training and support needs for the field. Findings suggest an opportunity to examine research collaboration needs among early career D&I scientists, and provide guidance on how to successfully provide mentorship and integrate health equity principles into collaborative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dissemination and implementation (D&I) scientists are key members of collaborative, interdisciplinary clinical and translational research teams. Yet, early career D&I researchers (ECRs) have few guidelines for cultivating productive research collaborations. We developed recommendations for ECRs in D&I when serving as collaborators or co-investigators.

Methods: We employed a consensus-building approach: (1) group discussions to identify 3 areas of interest: "Marketing yourself" (describing your value to non-D&I collaborators), "Collaboration considerations" (contributions during proposal development), and "Responsibilities following project initiation" (defining your role throughout projects); (2) first survey and focus groups to iteratively rank/refine sub-domains within each area; (3) second survey and expert input on clarity/content of sub-domains; and (4) iterative development of key recommendations.

Results: Forty-four D&I researchers completed the first survey, 12 of whom attended one of three focus groups. Twenty-nine D&I researchers completed the second survey (n = 29) and 10 experts provided input. We identified 25 recommendations. Findings suggest unique collaboration strengths (e.g, partnership-building) and challenges (e.g., unclear link to career milestones) for ECR D&I researchers, and underscore the value of ongoing training and mentorship for ECRs and the need to intersect collaborative D&I efforts with health equity principles.

Conclusions: Research collaborations are essential in clinical and translational research. We identified recommendations for D&I ECRs to be productive research collaborators, including training and support needs for the field. Findings suggest an opportunity to examine research collaboration needs among early career D&I scientists, and provide guidance on how to successfully provide mentorship and integrate health equity principles into collaborative research.

早期职业传播与实施研究者的跨学科研究合作建议:一项多阶段研究。
传播与实施(D&I)科学家是协作、跨学科临床和转化研究团队的关键成员。然而,早期职业D&I研究人员(ecr)几乎没有培养富有成效的研究合作的指导方针。作为合作者或共同研究者,我们为D&I中的ecr提出了建议。方法:我们采用了建立共识的方法:(1)小组讨论以确定3个感兴趣的领域:“营销你自己”(向非d&i合作者描述你的价值),“协作考虑”(提案开发期间的贡献),以及“项目启动后的责任”(在整个项目中定义你的角色);(2)首先进行调查和焦点小组,迭代地对每个区域内的子域进行排序/细化;(3)对子领域的清晰度/内容进行二次调查和专家意见;(4)重点建议的迭代开发。结果:44名D&I研究人员完成了第一次调查,其中12人参加了三个焦点小组中的一个。29名D&I研究人员完成了第二次调查(n = 29), 10名专家提供了意见。我们确定了25条建议。研究结果表明,ECR D&I研究人员具有独特的合作优势(例如,建立伙伴关系)和挑战(例如,与职业里程碑的联系不明确),并强调了对ECR进行持续培训和指导的价值,以及将合作D&I工作与卫生公平原则相结合的必要性。结论:研究合作在临床和转化研究中至关重要。我们确定了D&I ecr成为富有成效的研究合作者的建议,包括该领域的培训和支持需求。研究结果表明,有机会研究早期职业D&I科学家之间的研究合作需求,并就如何成功地提供指导和将卫生公平原则纳入合作研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信