Cognitive deficit identified via pre-operative patient reported outcome measures is a predictor for post-operative health care utilization in gynecologic oncology patients.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e60
Aashna Saini, John Endel Orav, Rachel Clark Sisodia, Lauren Philp
{"title":"Cognitive deficit identified via pre-operative patient reported outcome measures is a predictor for post-operative health care utilization in gynecologic oncology patients.","authors":"Aashna Saini, John Endel Orav, Rachel Clark Sisodia, Lauren Philp","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can be used to predict post-operative health care utilization in gynecology oncology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. PROMs were collected pre-operatively from all patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancy between 1/1/18 and 9/1/19 at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients received the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure Information System emotional and instrumental support questionnaires along with a disease specific PROM. Charts were reviewed to ascertain healthcare utilization (\"touches\") in the 90-day postoperative period defined as phone calls, emails or portal messages, office visits, emergency department (ED) encounters, and hospital admissions. Linear regression was used to identify PROMs associated with postoperative healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred seventy-one patients were administered questionnaires of which 307 (82.7%) completed PROMs and were included for analysis. A significant association was noted between adverse responses on many EORTC QLQ-C30 domains and increased postoperative healthcare utilization. Of all questions, \"difficulty remembering things\" was most strongly associated with both overall utilization (total touches p=0.01) and utilization in multiple domains. After forward selection against other significant PROMs, as difficulty with memory increased, both overall healthcare utilization (adjusted regression coefficient 1.9, p=0.01) and ED encounters increased (adjusted regression coefficient 0.10, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who report cognitive concerns are significantly more likely to have higher healthcare utilization postoperatively. Attention to this preoperatively could help identify patients at higher risk and further studies should determine if additional support around surgery can mitigate this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e60","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can be used to predict post-operative health care utilization in gynecology oncology patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. PROMs were collected pre-operatively from all patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancy between 1/1/18 and 9/1/19 at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients received the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure Information System emotional and instrumental support questionnaires along with a disease specific PROM. Charts were reviewed to ascertain healthcare utilization ("touches") in the 90-day postoperative period defined as phone calls, emails or portal messages, office visits, emergency department (ED) encounters, and hospital admissions. Linear regression was used to identify PROMs associated with postoperative healthcare utilization.

Results: Three hundred seventy-one patients were administered questionnaires of which 307 (82.7%) completed PROMs and were included for analysis. A significant association was noted between adverse responses on many EORTC QLQ-C30 domains and increased postoperative healthcare utilization. Of all questions, "difficulty remembering things" was most strongly associated with both overall utilization (total touches p=0.01) and utilization in multiple domains. After forward selection against other significant PROMs, as difficulty with memory increased, both overall healthcare utilization (adjusted regression coefficient 1.9, p=0.01) and ED encounters increased (adjusted regression coefficient 0.10, p=0.01).

Conclusion: Patients who report cognitive concerns are significantly more likely to have higher healthcare utilization postoperatively. Attention to this preoperatively could help identify patients at higher risk and further studies should determine if additional support around surgery can mitigate this risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过术前患者报告的结果测量确定的认知缺陷是妇科肿瘤患者术后保健利用的预测因子。
目的:探讨术前患者报告预后指标(PROMs)是否可用于预测妇科肿瘤患者术后保健利用情况。方法:经机构审查委员会批准后进行回顾性研究。于2018年1月1日至2019年9月1日在某三级学术医疗中心接受妇科恶性肿瘤手术的所有患者术前收集PROMs。患者接受了EORTC QLQ-C30和患者报告的结果测量信息系统情感和工具支持问卷以及疾病特异性PROM。检查图表以确定术后90天期间的医疗保健利用(“接触”),定义为电话、电子邮件或门户信息、办公室访问、急诊(ED)就诊和住院。使用线性回归来确定与术后医疗保健利用相关的prom。结果:共对371例患者进行问卷调查,其中307例(82.7%)完成问卷调查并纳入分析。许多EORTC QLQ-C30结构域的不良反应与术后医疗保健利用率的增加之间存在显著关联。在所有问题中,“记忆困难”与总体使用(总触摸p=0.01)和多领域使用最密切相关。在对其他显著prom进行正向选择后,随着记忆困难的增加,总体医疗保健利用率(调整回归系数1.9,p=0.01)和ED就诊次数均增加(调整回归系数0.10,p=0.01)。结论:报告认知问题的患者术后更有可能有更高的医疗保健利用率。术前注意这一点可以帮助识别高风险患者,进一步的研究应该确定手术周围的额外支持是否可以减轻这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信