The Drug Allergy History Tool (DAHT): Validation of a Patient-Reported Survey Instrument.

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Kimberly G Blumenthal, Daniel A Gundersen, Liam R Smith, Brett Nava-Coulter, Andrew King, Elizabeth J Phillips, Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada, Iris M Otani, Allison Ramsey, Aleena Banerji, Timothy Chow, Cosby A Stone, Whitney A Salinas, David A Khan
{"title":"The Drug Allergy History Tool (DAHT): Validation of a Patient-Reported Survey Instrument.","authors":"Kimberly G Blumenthal, Daniel A Gundersen, Liam R Smith, Brett Nava-Coulter, Andrew King, Elizabeth J Phillips, Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada, Iris M Otani, Allison Ramsey, Aleena Banerji, Timothy Chow, Cosby A Stone, Whitney A Salinas, David A Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.jaci.2025.02.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the reaction history is critical for drug allergy evaluations and is typically self-reported, there is no validated survey instrument to collect drug allergy history from patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a survey instrument that collects patient-reported drug allergy history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Drug Allergy History Tool (DAHT) was revised after three rounds of cognitive testing, with data assessed for reliability, through test-retest comparison, and quality and validity, through a concordance analysis against electronic health record (EHR) allergist documentation. Participants completing testing and surveys were recruited from drug allergy clinics at Massachusetts General Hospital. Primary evaluative measures were percent agreement and Kappa statistic values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DAHT was completed by 79 individuals (mean age 49 [SD 17] years, 85% Female, 85% White, 11% Hispanic ethnicity); 29 with single-drug allergy labels and 50 with multiple drug allergy labels. The most common drug allergy labels were penicillins (77%), sulfonamides (32%), cephalosporins (15%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8%). DAHT achieved acceptable test-retest reliability (median Kappa = 0.64, median percent agreement = 86%). The DAHT achieved a more complete allergy history than the allergist documentation in the EHR with lower median item uncertainty (21% DAHT vs 79% EHR) with fair concordance (median Kappa = 0.21, median percent agreement = 67%) between the two data sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DAHT is a reliable and valid source of patient-reported allergy information. This tool can be used in clinical care and clinical research to obtain standardized patient reported drug allergy history.</p>","PeriodicalId":14936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2025.02.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the reaction history is critical for drug allergy evaluations and is typically self-reported, there is no validated survey instrument to collect drug allergy history from patients.

Objective: To validate a survey instrument that collects patient-reported drug allergy history.

Methods: The Drug Allergy History Tool (DAHT) was revised after three rounds of cognitive testing, with data assessed for reliability, through test-retest comparison, and quality and validity, through a concordance analysis against electronic health record (EHR) allergist documentation. Participants completing testing and surveys were recruited from drug allergy clinics at Massachusetts General Hospital. Primary evaluative measures were percent agreement and Kappa statistic values.

Results: The DAHT was completed by 79 individuals (mean age 49 [SD 17] years, 85% Female, 85% White, 11% Hispanic ethnicity); 29 with single-drug allergy labels and 50 with multiple drug allergy labels. The most common drug allergy labels were penicillins (77%), sulfonamides (32%), cephalosporins (15%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8%). DAHT achieved acceptable test-retest reliability (median Kappa = 0.64, median percent agreement = 86%). The DAHT achieved a more complete allergy history than the allergist documentation in the EHR with lower median item uncertainty (21% DAHT vs 79% EHR) with fair concordance (median Kappa = 0.21, median percent agreement = 67%) between the two data sources.

Conclusion: The DAHT is a reliable and valid source of patient-reported allergy information. This tool can be used in clinical care and clinical research to obtain standardized patient reported drug allergy history.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
1302
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a prestigious publication that features groundbreaking research in the fields of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. This influential journal publishes high-impact research papers that explore various topics, including asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, primary immune deficiencies, occupational and environmental allergy, and other allergic and immunologic diseases. The articles not only report on clinical trials and mechanistic studies but also provide insights into novel therapies, underlying mechanisms, and important discoveries that contribute to our understanding of these diseases. By sharing this valuable information, the journal aims to enhance the diagnosis and management of patients in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信