Adjustment of branched-chain amino acid balance fails to prevent feed intake decline in lactating sows fed high soybean meal diets.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Dalton C Humphrey, Laura L Greiner
{"title":"Adjustment of branched-chain amino acid balance fails to prevent feed intake decline in lactating sows fed high soybean meal diets.","authors":"Dalton C Humphrey, Laura L Greiner","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 352 sows were used to investigate the effect of soybean meal (SBM) level and adjusted branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) balance on lactating sow and piglet performance. On day 112 ± 1.5 of gestation, sows were randomly assigned, within parity, to one of four dietary treatments: low SBM (LSBM), high SBM (HSBM), LSBM with adjusted BCAA (LSBM+BCAA), or HSBM with adjusted BCAA (HSBM+BCAA). The BCAA balance was adjusted to achieve equal standardized ileal digestible (SID) Ile:Leu:Val in the LSBM and HSBM+BCAA diets (SID Ile:Leu:Val 0.49:1.00:0.73) and in the HSBM and LSBM+BCAA diets (SID Ile:Leu:Val 0.54:1.00:0.58). All diets were formulated to be equal in SID Lys, isocaloric, and meet or exceed NRC (2012) recommendations for all other essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals. Sow body weight (BW) and backfat thickness (BF) were measured at the time of entry into the farrowing room and at weaning. Litter weights were captured after cross-fostering and at weaning to calculate litter growth rate. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models in R (v4.4.1; R Core Team, 2024) with fixed effects of dietary treatment, parity group, and their interaction and a random effect of lactation group. The sow and her litter were the experimental unit, and results were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05. There was an effect of the dietary treatments on sow average daily feed intake (ADFI; P < 0.001). Sows consuming the LSBM diet exhibited greater ADFI compared to HSBM (7.43 vs. 7.05 kg/d; P = 0.024) or HSBM+BCAA (7.43 vs. 6.87; P < 0.001), while sows fed LSBM+BCAA showed greater ADFI than HSBM+BCAA (7.24 vs. 6.87; P = 0.025), but similar ADFI to LSBM- (P = 0.515) and HSBM-fed (P = 0.466) fed sows. Despite differences in ADFI, sows gained an average of 7.1 kg of BW (P = 0.682) and lost 1.3 mm of BF (P = 0.928) through the lactation period. Sows started the trial with an average of 14.0 piglets/sow (P = 0.787) and weaned 12.6 piglets/sow (P = 0.875) with a piglet average daily gain of 0.22 kg/d (P = 0.646). Increasing SBM inclusion by 14% reduced sow ADFI in lactation by approximately 5%, but did not alter sow BW or BF loss or piglet growth rate. While adjusting BCAA in the LSBM diet slightly reduced sow feed intake, adjusting BCAA in the HSBM diet did not alleviate the reduction in ADFI caused by elevated SBM, suggesting the balance of BCAA does not contribute to the feed intake response observed with elevated SBM inclusion in lactation diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A total of 352 sows were used to investigate the effect of soybean meal (SBM) level and adjusted branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) balance on lactating sow and piglet performance. On day 112 ± 1.5 of gestation, sows were randomly assigned, within parity, to one of four dietary treatments: low SBM (LSBM), high SBM (HSBM), LSBM with adjusted BCAA (LSBM+BCAA), or HSBM with adjusted BCAA (HSBM+BCAA). The BCAA balance was adjusted to achieve equal standardized ileal digestible (SID) Ile:Leu:Val in the LSBM and HSBM+BCAA diets (SID Ile:Leu:Val 0.49:1.00:0.73) and in the HSBM and LSBM+BCAA diets (SID Ile:Leu:Val 0.54:1.00:0.58). All diets were formulated to be equal in SID Lys, isocaloric, and meet or exceed NRC (2012) recommendations for all other essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals. Sow body weight (BW) and backfat thickness (BF) were measured at the time of entry into the farrowing room and at weaning. Litter weights were captured after cross-fostering and at weaning to calculate litter growth rate. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models in R (v4.4.1; R Core Team, 2024) with fixed effects of dietary treatment, parity group, and their interaction and a random effect of lactation group. The sow and her litter were the experimental unit, and results were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05. There was an effect of the dietary treatments on sow average daily feed intake (ADFI; P < 0.001). Sows consuming the LSBM diet exhibited greater ADFI compared to HSBM (7.43 vs. 7.05 kg/d; P = 0.024) or HSBM+BCAA (7.43 vs. 6.87; P < 0.001), while sows fed LSBM+BCAA showed greater ADFI than HSBM+BCAA (7.24 vs. 6.87; P = 0.025), but similar ADFI to LSBM- (P = 0.515) and HSBM-fed (P = 0.466) fed sows. Despite differences in ADFI, sows gained an average of 7.1 kg of BW (P = 0.682) and lost 1.3 mm of BF (P = 0.928) through the lactation period. Sows started the trial with an average of 14.0 piglets/sow (P = 0.787) and weaned 12.6 piglets/sow (P = 0.875) with a piglet average daily gain of 0.22 kg/d (P = 0.646). Increasing SBM inclusion by 14% reduced sow ADFI in lactation by approximately 5%, but did not alter sow BW or BF loss or piglet growth rate. While adjusting BCAA in the LSBM diet slightly reduced sow feed intake, adjusting BCAA in the HSBM diet did not alleviate the reduction in ADFI caused by elevated SBM, suggesting the balance of BCAA does not contribute to the feed intake response observed with elevated SBM inclusion in lactation diets.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信