Validation of the capnodynamic method to calculate mixed venous oxygen saturation in postoperative cardiac patients.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallback, Hareem Iftikhar, Elise Keleher, Anders Aneman
{"title":"Validation of the capnodynamic method to calculate mixed venous oxygen saturation in postoperative cardiac patients.","authors":"Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallback, Hareem Iftikhar, Elise Keleher, Anders Aneman","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00741-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation are key variables in monitoring adequate oxygen delivery and have typically been measured using pulmonary artery catheterisation. The capnodynamic method measures effective pulmonary blood flow utilising carbon dioxide kinetics in ventilated patients. Combined with breath-by-breath measurements of carbon dioxide elimination, a non-invasive approximation of mixed venous oxygen saturation can be calculated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study primarily investigated the agreement between mixed venous oxygen saturation calculated using the capnodynamic method and blood gas analysis of mixed venous blood sampled via a pulmonary artery catheter in 47 haemodynamically stable postoperative cardiac patients. Both measurements were synchronised and performed during alveolar recruitment by stepwise changes to the level of positive end-expiratory pressure. Simultaneously, we studied the agreement between effective pulmonary blood flow and thermodilution cardiac output. The Bland-Altman method for repeated measurements and calculation of percentage error were used to examine agreement. Measurements before and after alveolar recruitment were analysed by a paired t test. The study hypothesis for agreement was a limit of difference of ten percentage points between mixed venous oxygen saturation using the capnodynamic algorithm vs. catheter blood gas analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Capnodynamic calculation of mixed venous saturation compared to blood gas analysis showed a bias of -0.02 [95% CI - 0.96-0.91] % and limits of agreement at 8.8 [95% CI 7.7-10] % and - 8.9 [95% CI -10-- 7.8] %. The percentage error was < 20%. The effective pulmonary blood flow compared to thermodilution showed a bias of - 0.41 [95% CI - 0.55-- 0.28] l.min<sup>-1</sup> and limits of agreement at 0.56 [95% CI 0.41-0.75] l.min<sup>-1</sup> and - 1.38 [95% CI - 1.57--1.24] l.min<sup>-1</sup>. The percentage error was < 30%. Only effective pulmonary blood flow increased by 0.38 [95% CI 0.20-0.56] l.min<sup>-1</sup> (p < 0.01) after alveolar recruitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, minimal bias and limits of agreement < 10% between mixed venous oxygen saturation calculated by the capnodynamic method and pulmonary arterial blood gas analysis confirmed the agreement hypothesis in stable postoperative patients. The effective pulmonary blood flow agreed with thermodilution cardiac output, while influenced by pulmonary shunt flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00741-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation are key variables in monitoring adequate oxygen delivery and have typically been measured using pulmonary artery catheterisation. The capnodynamic method measures effective pulmonary blood flow utilising carbon dioxide kinetics in ventilated patients. Combined with breath-by-breath measurements of carbon dioxide elimination, a non-invasive approximation of mixed venous oxygen saturation can be calculated.

Methods: This study primarily investigated the agreement between mixed venous oxygen saturation calculated using the capnodynamic method and blood gas analysis of mixed venous blood sampled via a pulmonary artery catheter in 47 haemodynamically stable postoperative cardiac patients. Both measurements were synchronised and performed during alveolar recruitment by stepwise changes to the level of positive end-expiratory pressure. Simultaneously, we studied the agreement between effective pulmonary blood flow and thermodilution cardiac output. The Bland-Altman method for repeated measurements and calculation of percentage error were used to examine agreement. Measurements before and after alveolar recruitment were analysed by a paired t test. The study hypothesis for agreement was a limit of difference of ten percentage points between mixed venous oxygen saturation using the capnodynamic algorithm vs. catheter blood gas analysis.

Results: Capnodynamic calculation of mixed venous saturation compared to blood gas analysis showed a bias of -0.02 [95% CI - 0.96-0.91] % and limits of agreement at 8.8 [95% CI 7.7-10] % and - 8.9 [95% CI -10-- 7.8] %. The percentage error was < 20%. The effective pulmonary blood flow compared to thermodilution showed a bias of - 0.41 [95% CI - 0.55-- 0.28] l.min-1 and limits of agreement at 0.56 [95% CI 0.41-0.75] l.min-1 and - 1.38 [95% CI - 1.57--1.24] l.min-1. The percentage error was < 30%. Only effective pulmonary blood flow increased by 0.38 [95% CI 0.20-0.56] l.min-1 (p < 0.01) after alveolar recruitment.

Conclusions: In this study, minimal bias and limits of agreement < 10% between mixed venous oxygen saturation calculated by the capnodynamic method and pulmonary arterial blood gas analysis confirmed the agreement hypothesis in stable postoperative patients. The effective pulmonary blood flow agreed with thermodilution cardiac output, while influenced by pulmonary shunt flow.

计算心脏术后患者混合静脉血氧饱和度的capnodynamic方法的验证。
背景:心输出量和混合静脉血氧饱和度是监测足量供氧的关键变量,通常使用肺动脉导管测量。二氧化碳动力学方法利用通气患者的二氧化碳动力学测量有效的肺血流量。结合逐呼吸测量二氧化碳消除,可以计算出混合静脉氧饱和度的非侵入性近似。方法:本研究主要探讨47例血流动力学稳定的心脏术后患者经肺动脉导管采集的混合静脉血的血气分析与用碳动力学方法计算的混合静脉血血氧饱和度的一致性。这两项测量是同步的,并在肺泡恢复期间通过逐步改变呼气末正压水平进行。同时,我们研究了有效肺血流量与热稀释心输出量之间的一致性。使用Bland-Altman方法重复测量和计算百分比误差来检验一致性。通过配对t检验分析肺泡恢复前后的测量结果。研究一致的假设是使用capnodynamic算法的混合静脉氧饱和度与导管血气分析之间的差异限制为10个百分点。结果:与血气分析相比,混合静脉饱和度的Capnodynamic计算显示偏差为-0.02 [95% CI - 0.96-0.91] %,一致性限为8.8 [95% CI - 7.7-10] %和- 8.9 [95% CI -10- 7.8] %。百分比误差为-1,一致性限为0.56 [95% CI - 0.41-0.75] l.min-1和- 1.38 [95% CI - 1.57- 1.24] l.min-1。误差百分比为-1 (p)。结论:在本研究中,偏差最小,一致性有限
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信