Expiratory ventilation assistance versus pressure-controlled ventilation with ambient oxygen in a hemorrhagic trauma model: a prehospital rescue option?

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tomas Karlsson, Jenny Gustavsson, Katrin Wellfelt, Mattias Günther
{"title":"Expiratory ventilation assistance versus pressure-controlled ventilation with ambient oxygen in a hemorrhagic trauma model: a prehospital rescue option?","authors":"Tomas Karlsson, Jenny Gustavsson, Katrin Wellfelt, Mattias Günther","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00742-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital airway management is critical for maintaining oxygenation after severe trauma hemorrhage. In cases of semi-obstructed airways, intubation with an endotracheal tube may fail, whereas a 14 French intubating catheter may provide an alternative for ventilation. Expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) through such a catheter could serve as a prehospital rescue option, particularly when oxygen supply is limited. This study evaluates whether EVA with ambient air is sufficient to maintain oxygenation and compares its effectiveness with pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three anesthetized swines (mean weight 58.3 kg, SD 4.6) were subjected to 32% blood volume hemorrhage and allocated to either EVA (n = 11) or PCV (n = 12). Historical data were used in the control group. Three phases were studied: 15 min without intervention (emulating initial prehospital care), 30 min of whole blood resuscitation, and 15 min post-resuscitation. Parameters including oxygen delivery (DO<sub>2</sub>), oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), arterial saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>), intratracheal pressures, and lactate levels were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EVA and PCV demonstrated similar effectiveness in maintaining indexed DO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.114), VO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.325), oxygen extraction rate (p = 0.841), and SaO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.097). Intratracheal pressures were significantly lower with EVA (p < 0.0001). EVA maintained clinically sufficient oxygenation (PaO<sub>2</sub> > 8.6 kPa) but PaCO<sub>2</sub> levels increased compared with control. Lactate levels were significantly lower in the EVA group during resuscitation (3.1 mmol/L vs. 4.8 mmol/L, p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both EVA and PCV effectively maintained oxygen delivery and sufficient oxygenation after trauma hemorrhage and whole blood resuscitation. Lower intratracheal pressures and reduced lactate accumulation with EVA suggest it may be a viable prehospital rescue method, especially in scenarios with limited oxygen supply. Further investigation is warranted to optimize its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00742-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prehospital airway management is critical for maintaining oxygenation after severe trauma hemorrhage. In cases of semi-obstructed airways, intubation with an endotracheal tube may fail, whereas a 14 French intubating catheter may provide an alternative for ventilation. Expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) through such a catheter could serve as a prehospital rescue option, particularly when oxygen supply is limited. This study evaluates whether EVA with ambient air is sufficient to maintain oxygenation and compares its effectiveness with pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).

Methods: Twenty-three anesthetized swines (mean weight 58.3 kg, SD 4.6) were subjected to 32% blood volume hemorrhage and allocated to either EVA (n = 11) or PCV (n = 12). Historical data were used in the control group. Three phases were studied: 15 min without intervention (emulating initial prehospital care), 30 min of whole blood resuscitation, and 15 min post-resuscitation. Parameters including oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen consumption (VO2), arterial saturation (SaO2), intratracheal pressures, and lactate levels were measured.

Results: EVA and PCV demonstrated similar effectiveness in maintaining indexed DO2 (p = 0.114), VO2 (p = 0.325), oxygen extraction rate (p = 0.841), and SaO2 (p = 0.097). Intratracheal pressures were significantly lower with EVA (p < 0.0001). EVA maintained clinically sufficient oxygenation (PaO2 > 8.6 kPa) but PaCO2 levels increased compared with control. Lactate levels were significantly lower in the EVA group during resuscitation (3.1 mmol/L vs. 4.8 mmol/L, p = 0.032).

Conclusion: Both EVA and PCV effectively maintained oxygen delivery and sufficient oxygenation after trauma hemorrhage and whole blood resuscitation. Lower intratracheal pressures and reduced lactate accumulation with EVA suggest it may be a viable prehospital rescue method, especially in scenarios with limited oxygen supply. Further investigation is warranted to optimize its application.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信