Jonathon E Mohl, Patrick D Brown, Aaron J Robbins, Philip Lavretsky, Rick Hochberg, Robert L Wallace, Elizabeth J Walsh
{"title":"Comparing Small and Large Genomes Within Monogonont Rotifers.","authors":"Jonathon E Mohl, Patrick D Brown, Aaron J Robbins, Philip Lavretsky, Rick Hochberg, Robert L Wallace, Elizabeth J Walsh","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evaf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome size is an important correlate of many biological features including body size, metabolic rate, and developmental rate and can vary due to a variety of mechanisms, including incorporation of repetitive elements, duplication events, or reduction due to selective constraints. Our ability to understand the causes of genome size variation is hampered by limited sampling of many nonmodel taxa, including monogonont rotifers. Here, we used high-throughput Nanopore sequencing and flow cytometry to estimate genome sizes of nine species of monogonont rotifers representing seven families, including three representatives of Superorder Gnesiotrocha. We annotated the genomes and classified the repetitive elements. We also compared genome size with two biological features: body size and metabolic rate. Body sizes were obtained from the literature and our estimates. Oxygen consumption was used as a proxy for metabolic rate and was determined using a respirometer. We obtained similar genome size estimates from genome assemblies and flow cytometry, which were positively correlated with body size and size-specific respiration rate. Importantly, we determined that genome size variation is not due to increased numbers of repetitive elements or large regions of duplication. Instead, we observed higher numbers of predicted proteins as genome size increased, but currently many have no known function. Our results substantially expand the taxonomic scope of available genomes for Rotifera and provide opportunities for addressing genetic mechanisms underlying evolutionary and ecological processes in the phylum.</p>","PeriodicalId":12779,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaf041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genome size is an important correlate of many biological features including body size, metabolic rate, and developmental rate and can vary due to a variety of mechanisms, including incorporation of repetitive elements, duplication events, or reduction due to selective constraints. Our ability to understand the causes of genome size variation is hampered by limited sampling of many nonmodel taxa, including monogonont rotifers. Here, we used high-throughput Nanopore sequencing and flow cytometry to estimate genome sizes of nine species of monogonont rotifers representing seven families, including three representatives of Superorder Gnesiotrocha. We annotated the genomes and classified the repetitive elements. We also compared genome size with two biological features: body size and metabolic rate. Body sizes were obtained from the literature and our estimates. Oxygen consumption was used as a proxy for metabolic rate and was determined using a respirometer. We obtained similar genome size estimates from genome assemblies and flow cytometry, which were positively correlated with body size and size-specific respiration rate. Importantly, we determined that genome size variation is not due to increased numbers of repetitive elements or large regions of duplication. Instead, we observed higher numbers of predicted proteins as genome size increased, but currently many have no known function. Our results substantially expand the taxonomic scope of available genomes for Rotifera and provide opportunities for addressing genetic mechanisms underlying evolutionary and ecological processes in the phylum.
期刊介绍:
About the journal
Genome Biology and Evolution (GBE) publishes leading original research at the interface between evolutionary biology and genomics. Papers considered for publication report novel evolutionary findings that concern natural genome diversity, population genomics, the structure, function, organisation and expression of genomes, comparative genomics, proteomics, and environmental genomic interactions. Major evolutionary insights from the fields of computational biology, structural biology, developmental biology, and cell biology are also considered, as are theoretical advances in the field of genome evolution. GBE’s scope embraces genome-wide evolutionary investigations at all taxonomic levels and for all forms of life — within populations or across domains. Its aims are to further the understanding of genomes in their evolutionary context and further the understanding of evolution from a genome-wide perspective.