Comparing Small and Large Genomes Within Monogonont Rotifers.

IF 3.2 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Jonathon E Mohl, Patrick D Brown, Aaron J Robbins, Philip Lavretsky, Rick Hochberg, Robert L Wallace, Elizabeth J Walsh
{"title":"Comparing Small and Large Genomes Within Monogonont Rotifers.","authors":"Jonathon E Mohl, Patrick D Brown, Aaron J Robbins, Philip Lavretsky, Rick Hochberg, Robert L Wallace, Elizabeth J Walsh","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evaf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome size is an important correlate of many biological features including body size, metabolic rate, and developmental rate and can vary due to a variety of mechanisms, including incorporation of repetitive elements, duplication events, or reduction due to selective constraints. Our ability to understand the causes of genome size variation is hampered by limited sampling of many nonmodel taxa, including monogonont rotifers. Here, we used high-throughput Nanopore sequencing and flow cytometry to estimate genome sizes of nine species of monogonont rotifers representing seven families, including three representatives of Superorder Gnesiotrocha. We annotated the genomes and classified the repetitive elements. We also compared genome size with two biological features: body size and metabolic rate. Body sizes were obtained from the literature and our estimates. Oxygen consumption was used as a proxy for metabolic rate and was determined using a respirometer. We obtained similar genome size estimates from genome assemblies and flow cytometry, which were positively correlated with body size and size-specific respiration rate. Importantly, we determined that genome size variation is not due to increased numbers of repetitive elements or large regions of duplication. Instead, we observed higher numbers of predicted proteins as genome size increased, but currently many have no known function. Our results substantially expand the taxonomic scope of available genomes for Rotifera and provide opportunities for addressing genetic mechanisms underlying evolutionary and ecological processes in the phylum.</p>","PeriodicalId":12779,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaf041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome size is an important correlate of many biological features including body size, metabolic rate, and developmental rate and can vary due to a variety of mechanisms, including incorporation of repetitive elements, duplication events, or reduction due to selective constraints. Our ability to understand the causes of genome size variation is hampered by limited sampling of many nonmodel taxa, including monogonont rotifers. Here, we used high-throughput Nanopore sequencing and flow cytometry to estimate genome sizes of nine species of monogonont rotifers representing seven families, including three representatives of Superorder Gnesiotrocha. We annotated the genomes and classified the repetitive elements. We also compared genome size with two biological features: body size and metabolic rate. Body sizes were obtained from the literature and our estimates. Oxygen consumption was used as a proxy for metabolic rate and was determined using a respirometer. We obtained similar genome size estimates from genome assemblies and flow cytometry, which were positively correlated with body size and size-specific respiration rate. Importantly, we determined that genome size variation is not due to increased numbers of repetitive elements or large regions of duplication. Instead, we observed higher numbers of predicted proteins as genome size increased, but currently many have no known function. Our results substantially expand the taxonomic scope of available genomes for Rotifera and provide opportunities for addressing genetic mechanisms underlying evolutionary and ecological processes in the phylum.

单体轮虫小基因组与大基因组的比较。
基因组大小是许多生物学特征的重要相关因素,包括体型、代谢率和发育率,并且可能由于多种机制而变化,包括重复元素的结合、重复事件或由于选择限制而减少。我们理解基因组大小变异原因的能力受到许多非模式分类群的有限采样的阻碍,包括单纲轮虫。本文采用高通量纳米孔测序和流式细胞术对7科9种单单轮虫的基因组大小进行了估计,其中包括超目Gnesiotrocha的3种代表。我们对基因组进行了注释并对重复元件进行了分类。我们还比较了基因组大小与两个生物学特征:体型和代谢率。体型大小来自文献和我们的估计。耗氧量被用作代谢率的代表,并使用呼吸计测定。我们从基因组组装和流式细胞术中获得了类似的基因组大小估计值,这与体型和体型特异性呼吸速率呈正相关。重要的是,我们确定基因组大小的变化不是由于重复元素数量的增加或重复区域的扩大。相反,我们观察到随着基因组大小的增加,预测的蛋白质数量会增加,但目前许多蛋白质还没有已知的功能。我们的研究结果极大地扩展了轮虫属可用基因组的分类范围,并为解决该门进化和生态过程的遗传机制提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Biology and Evolution
Genome Biology and Evolution EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: About the journal Genome Biology and Evolution (GBE) publishes leading original research at the interface between evolutionary biology and genomics. Papers considered for publication report novel evolutionary findings that concern natural genome diversity, population genomics, the structure, function, organisation and expression of genomes, comparative genomics, proteomics, and environmental genomic interactions. Major evolutionary insights from the fields of computational biology, structural biology, developmental biology, and cell biology are also considered, as are theoretical advances in the field of genome evolution. GBE’s scope embraces genome-wide evolutionary investigations at all taxonomic levels and for all forms of life — within populations or across domains. Its aims are to further the understanding of genomes in their evolutionary context and further the understanding of evolution from a genome-wide perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信