Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1509947
Xiaoyan Huang, Miaohui Wu, Baoliang Huang, Yi Zhang
{"title":"Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaoyan Huang, Miaohui Wu, Baoliang Huang, Yi Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1509947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, a prevalent chronic liver condition, can cause severe complications like hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In recent years, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP - 1RA) have shown unique therapeutic advantages and may become a preferred treatment for it. This meta-analysis aims to systematically examine GLP-1RA associated adverse events, providing a basis for guiding patient clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the therapeutic effects of GLP-1RA in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search period extended from the inception of each database until December 2023. Information pertaining to various adverse events was collected as outcome measures. Statistical analysis of the results and assessment of bias risk were conducted utilizing Review Manager (version 5.4.1) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An analysis of 10 studies encompassing 960 participants revealed a significantly higher overall incidence of adverse events in the GLP-1RA group compared to the control group (OR: 2.40 [1.10, 5.26], <i>P</i> = 0.03). Subgroup analysis based on treatment duration demonstrated a higher rate of adverse events in the GLP-1RA group during follow-ups of less than 30 weeks (<i>P</i> = 0.0005, OR: 3.58 [1.75, 7.32]), but no statistical difference was observed between the two groups in follow-ups exceeding 30 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in adverse events leading to discontinuation (<i>P</i> = 0.29, OR: 1.47 [0.72, 2.98]). However, a notable difference was observed in gastrointestinal adverse events (<i>P</i> < 0.00001, OR: 4.83 [3.36, 6.95]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GLP-1RA exhibits an overall higher incidence of adverse events in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, particularly in the gastrointestinal domain. Short-term use of GLP-1RA may be associated with a greater occurrence of adverse events, underscoring the importance of educating patients on preventive measures and establishing tolerance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in severe adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation, confirming the safety profile of GLP-1RA application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1509947"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1509947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, a prevalent chronic liver condition, can cause severe complications like hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In recent years, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP - 1RA) have shown unique therapeutic advantages and may become a preferred treatment for it. This meta-analysis aims to systematically examine GLP-1RA associated adverse events, providing a basis for guiding patient clinical management.

Methods: We conducted a search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the therapeutic effects of GLP-1RA in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search period extended from the inception of each database until December 2023. Information pertaining to various adverse events was collected as outcome measures. Statistical analysis of the results and assessment of bias risk were conducted utilizing Review Manager (version 5.4.1) software.

Results: An analysis of 10 studies encompassing 960 participants revealed a significantly higher overall incidence of adverse events in the GLP-1RA group compared to the control group (OR: 2.40 [1.10, 5.26], P = 0.03). Subgroup analysis based on treatment duration demonstrated a higher rate of adverse events in the GLP-1RA group during follow-ups of less than 30 weeks (P = 0.0005, OR: 3.58 [1.75, 7.32]), but no statistical difference was observed between the two groups in follow-ups exceeding 30 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in adverse events leading to discontinuation (P = 0.29, OR: 1.47 [0.72, 2.98]). However, a notable difference was observed in gastrointestinal adverse events (P < 0.00001, OR: 4.83 [3.36, 6.95]).

Conclusion: GLP-1RA exhibits an overall higher incidence of adverse events in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, particularly in the gastrointestinal domain. Short-term use of GLP-1RA may be associated with a greater occurrence of adverse events, underscoring the importance of educating patients on preventive measures and establishing tolerance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in severe adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation, confirming the safety profile of GLP-1RA application.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信