Abderrahim Oussalah, Vincent Haghnejad, Maël Silva Rodriguez, Anne-Sophie Lagneaux, Tom Alix, Pierre Filhine-Tresarrieu, Janina Ferrand, Jean Jung, Julien Broseus, Sylvain Salignac, Amandine Luc, Cédric Baumann, Philipp Schuetz, Alain Lozniewski, Katell Peoc'h, Hervé Puy, Jean-Louis Guéant, Jean-Pierre Bronowicki
{"title":"Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin: A rapid sepsis biomarker for diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.","authors":"Abderrahim Oussalah, Vincent Haghnejad, Maël Silva Rodriguez, Anne-Sophie Lagneaux, Tom Alix, Pierre Filhine-Tresarrieu, Janina Ferrand, Jean Jung, Julien Broseus, Sylvain Salignac, Amandine Luc, Cédric Baumann, Philipp Schuetz, Alain Lozniewski, Katell Peoc'h, Hervé Puy, Jean-Louis Guéant, Jean-Pierre Bronowicki","doi":"10.1111/eci.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a frequent and life-threatening complication of cirrhosis, contributing to considerable morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional derivation study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of two sepsis-related calcitonin peptide family biomarkers, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-pro-ADM) and procalcitonin, in ascitic fluid for identifying bacteriologically confirmed SBP (BC-SBP). In a subsequent validation study, the diagnostic performance of the 'SBP score' was evaluated in an independent patient cohort using an absolute polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte count threshold of ≥250 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> as the diagnostic benchmark for diagnosing SBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the derivation study, the concentration of MR-pro-ADM in ascitic fluid was significantly higher in patients with BC-SBP compared to those without BC-SBP (3.14 nmol/L [IQR, 2.39-6.74] vs. 1.91 nmol/L [IQR, 1.33-2.80]; p = .0002). Bayesian ANOVA indicated that MR-pro-ADM was highly discriminative for diagnosing BC-SBP, with a substantial Bayes factor (BFM = 2505), whereas procalcitonin exhibited poor discriminatory performance. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal MR-pro-ADM cut-off of ≥2.50 nmol/L for diagnosing BC-SBP, with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.746 (95% CI, 0.685-0.801; p < .0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified three independent predictors of BC-SBP, which were subsequently incorporated into the 'SBP score' (MR-pro-ADM ≥2.5 nmol/L, absolute PMN count ≥250 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> and Child-Pugh score). In the validation study, the 'SBP score' demonstrated an AUROC of 0.993 (95% CI, 0.929-1.000; p < .0001) for diagnosing SBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MR-pro-ADM in ascitic fluid emerges as a promising biomarker for SBP diagnosis. Combining MR-pro-ADM with absolute PMN count and Child-Pugh score in the 'SBP score' greatly improves the diagnostic accuracy of SBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a frequent and life-threatening complication of cirrhosis, contributing to considerable morbidity and mortality.
Methods: A cross-sectional derivation study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of two sepsis-related calcitonin peptide family biomarkers, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-pro-ADM) and procalcitonin, in ascitic fluid for identifying bacteriologically confirmed SBP (BC-SBP). In a subsequent validation study, the diagnostic performance of the 'SBP score' was evaluated in an independent patient cohort using an absolute polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte count threshold of ≥250 cells/mm3 as the diagnostic benchmark for diagnosing SBP.
Results: In the derivation study, the concentration of MR-pro-ADM in ascitic fluid was significantly higher in patients with BC-SBP compared to those without BC-SBP (3.14 nmol/L [IQR, 2.39-6.74] vs. 1.91 nmol/L [IQR, 1.33-2.80]; p = .0002). Bayesian ANOVA indicated that MR-pro-ADM was highly discriminative for diagnosing BC-SBP, with a substantial Bayes factor (BFM = 2505), whereas procalcitonin exhibited poor discriminatory performance. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal MR-pro-ADM cut-off of ≥2.50 nmol/L for diagnosing BC-SBP, with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.746 (95% CI, 0.685-0.801; p < .0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified three independent predictors of BC-SBP, which were subsequently incorporated into the 'SBP score' (MR-pro-ADM ≥2.5 nmol/L, absolute PMN count ≥250 cells/mm3 and Child-Pugh score). In the validation study, the 'SBP score' demonstrated an AUROC of 0.993 (95% CI, 0.929-1.000; p < .0001) for diagnosing SBP.
Conclusion: MR-pro-ADM in ascitic fluid emerges as a promising biomarker for SBP diagnosis. Combining MR-pro-ADM with absolute PMN count and Child-Pugh score in the 'SBP score' greatly improves the diagnostic accuracy of SBP.
期刊介绍：
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
