Health inequalities in incidence of bacteraemias: a national surveillance and data linkage study, England, 2018 to 2022.

IF 9.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Andrea Mazzella, Zahin Amin-Chowdhury, Amelia Andrews, Andre Charlett, Colin S Brown, Russell Hope, Dimple Chudasama
{"title":"Health inequalities in incidence of bacteraemias: a national surveillance and data linkage study, England, 2018 to 2022.","authors":"Andrea Mazzella, Zahin Amin-Chowdhury, Amelia Andrews, Andre Charlett, Colin S Brown, Russell Hope, Dimple Chudasama","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.9.2400312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHealth inequalities exist globally, but limited data exist on this topic for bacteraemia.AimIn this study we investigated health inequalities surrounding bacteraemia in England, to identify high-risk population groups and areas of intervention.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed English surveillance data between 2018 and 2022 for <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> species, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, and both meticillin-sensitive and resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MSSA, MRSA) bacteraemia. Crude incidence rates stratified by index of multiple deprivation and ethnic groups were calculated; age-adjusted rate ratios were estimated using negative binomial regression models.ResultsWe identified 342,787 bacteraemia cases. Across all pathogens, as the level of deprivation rose, so did the age-adjusted bacteraemia incidence rate ratio. Compared with residents of the 20% least deprived areas of England, residents of the 20% most deprived areas had a 2.68-fold increased bacteraemia rate for MRSA (95% CI: 2.29-3.13) and 1.95-fold for <i>E. coli</i> (95% CI: 1.84-2.05), and 15% higher odds of dying within 30 days of any bacteraemia (95% CI: 1.13-1.19). After age adjustment, the incidence of all bacteraemia was higher in the Asian and Black groups compared with the White group: for MRSA, 79% higher in the Asian (95% CI: 1.51-2.10) and 59% higher in the Black (95% CI: 1.29-1.95) groups. The exception was MSSA, whose incidence was highest in the White group.ConclusionDisproportionately higher age-adjusted incidence of bacteraemia occurred in deprived areas and ethnic minorities. These disparities are likely multifactorial, possibly including socioeconomic, cultural, and systemic risk factors and different burden of comorbidities. Better understanding these factors can enable targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"30 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.9.2400312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundHealth inequalities exist globally, but limited data exist on this topic for bacteraemia.AimIn this study we investigated health inequalities surrounding bacteraemia in England, to identify high-risk population groups and areas of intervention.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed English surveillance data between 2018 and 2022 for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and both meticillin-sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, MRSA) bacteraemia. Crude incidence rates stratified by index of multiple deprivation and ethnic groups were calculated; age-adjusted rate ratios were estimated using negative binomial regression models.ResultsWe identified 342,787 bacteraemia cases. Across all pathogens, as the level of deprivation rose, so did the age-adjusted bacteraemia incidence rate ratio. Compared with residents of the 20% least deprived areas of England, residents of the 20% most deprived areas had a 2.68-fold increased bacteraemia rate for MRSA (95% CI: 2.29-3.13) and 1.95-fold for E. coli (95% CI: 1.84-2.05), and 15% higher odds of dying within 30 days of any bacteraemia (95% CI: 1.13-1.19). After age adjustment, the incidence of all bacteraemia was higher in the Asian and Black groups compared with the White group: for MRSA, 79% higher in the Asian (95% CI: 1.51-2.10) and 59% higher in the Black (95% CI: 1.29-1.95) groups. The exception was MSSA, whose incidence was highest in the White group.ConclusionDisproportionately higher age-adjusted incidence of bacteraemia occurred in deprived areas and ethnic minorities. These disparities are likely multifactorial, possibly including socioeconomic, cultural, and systemic risk factors and different burden of comorbidities. Better understanding these factors can enable targeted interventions.

细菌血症发病率的健康不平等:2018年至2022年英国国家监测和数据链接研究。
全球范围内存在着卫生不平等现象,但关于菌血症这一主题的数据有限。目的在本研究中,我们调查了英国围绕菌血症的健康不平等,以确定高危人群和干预领域。方法回顾性分析2018年至2022年英国大肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌、铜绿假单胞菌以及甲氧西林敏感和耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA、MRSA)菌血症的监测数据。计算按多重剥夺指数和族群分层的粗发病率;使用负二项回归模型估计年龄调整后的比率。结果共发现342,787例菌血症病例。在所有病原体中,随着剥夺水平的上升,年龄调整的菌血症发病率比率也随之上升。与英格兰20%最贫困地区的居民相比,20%最贫困地区的居民MRSA菌血症率增加了2.68倍(95% CI: 2.29-3.13),大肠杆菌增加了1.95倍(95% CI: 1.84-2.05),任何菌血症在30天内死亡的几率增加了15% (95% CI: 1.13-1.19)。年龄调整后,与白人组相比,亚洲和黑人组所有菌血症的发生率更高:对于MRSA,亚洲组高79% (95% CI: 1.51-2.10),黑人组高59% (95% CI: 1.29-1.95)。唯一的例外是MSSA,其发病率在白人组中最高。结论贫困地区和少数民族地区菌血症的年龄调整发生率较高。这些差异可能是多因素的,可能包括社会经济、文化和系统风险因素以及不同的合并症负担。更好地了解这些因素可以使有针对性的干预成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurosurveillance
Eurosurveillance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
32.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
430
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信