Vascular Response, Downstream Effect, and Pharmacokinetics After Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Porcine Coronary Arteries.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kenji Kawai, Frank D Kolodgie, Rika Kawakami, Takao Konishi, Tatsuya Shiraki, Teruo Sekimoto, Takamasa Tanaka, Kai Shen, Renu Virmani, Aloke V Finn
{"title":"Vascular Response, Downstream Effect, and Pharmacokinetics After Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Porcine Coronary Arteries.","authors":"Kenji Kawai, Frank D Kolodgie, Rika Kawakami, Takao Konishi, Tatsuya Shiraki, Teruo Sekimoto, Takamasa Tanaka, Kai Shen, Renu Virmani, Aloke V Finn","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paclitaxel (PCB) and sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) are major therapeutic options for coronary artery disease, but there is no direct head-to-head histological comparison of their effects during the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to investigate the vascular and downstream effects and drug pharmacokinetics in a porcine coronary model treated with MagicTouch-SCB (MT-SCB), Selution-SRL-SCB (SEL-SCB), Agent PCB, and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight coronary arteries from 10 pigs were treated with one of three drug-coated balloons (DCBs) (n = 7 for each) or POBA (n = 7) with 28 days follow-up. In six pigs, histological assessment was performed for the arterial response with semi-quantified scoring. In four pigs, sirolimus and paclitaxel concentrations were measured in the coronary artery and downstream myocardium. All 10 animals were histologically assessed for downstream effects on the myocardium for distal emboli and tissue injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All DCBs showed minimal neointimal formation, but the MT-SCB and SEL-SCB showed less medial SMC loss compared to the PCB. In the histology section-based analysis of downstream myocardium, PCB showed evidence of myocyte necrosis/scarring in 21% of sections, whereas there was no evidence in the other groups (p < 0.01). POBA had the lowest downstream emboli (6%), followed by MT-SCB (15%), SEL-SCB (25%), and PCB (36%) (p = 0.02). In the pharmacokinetic analysis, paclitaxel showed higher concentration after PCB treatment compared to sirolimus after both two SCBs treatment in coronary and downstream myocardium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT-SCB and SEL-SCB demonstrated less arterial injury, less downstream effect, and lower drug concentration compared to PCB during PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paclitaxel (PCB) and sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) are major therapeutic options for coronary artery disease, but there is no direct head-to-head histological comparison of their effects during the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Aims: We aimed to investigate the vascular and downstream effects and drug pharmacokinetics in a porcine coronary model treated with MagicTouch-SCB (MT-SCB), Selution-SRL-SCB (SEL-SCB), Agent PCB, and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA).

Methods: Twenty-eight coronary arteries from 10 pigs were treated with one of three drug-coated balloons (DCBs) (n = 7 for each) or POBA (n = 7) with 28 days follow-up. In six pigs, histological assessment was performed for the arterial response with semi-quantified scoring. In four pigs, sirolimus and paclitaxel concentrations were measured in the coronary artery and downstream myocardium. All 10 animals were histologically assessed for downstream effects on the myocardium for distal emboli and tissue injury.

Results: All DCBs showed minimal neointimal formation, but the MT-SCB and SEL-SCB showed less medial SMC loss compared to the PCB. In the histology section-based analysis of downstream myocardium, PCB showed evidence of myocyte necrosis/scarring in 21% of sections, whereas there was no evidence in the other groups (p < 0.01). POBA had the lowest downstream emboli (6%), followed by MT-SCB (15%), SEL-SCB (25%), and PCB (36%) (p = 0.02). In the pharmacokinetic analysis, paclitaxel showed higher concentration after PCB treatment compared to sirolimus after both two SCBs treatment in coronary and downstream myocardium.

Conclusion: MT-SCB and SEL-SCB demonstrated less arterial injury, less downstream effect, and lower drug concentration compared to PCB during PCI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信