Comparing the Clinical Performance of High-Dose and Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloons for Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Results of the SATELLITE Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Naoki Yoshioka, Takahiro Tokuda, Akiko Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojima, Kohei Yamaguchi, Takashi Yanagiuchi, Kenji Ogata, Tatsuro Takei, Yasuhiro Morita, Tatsuya Nakama, Itsuro Morishima
{"title":"Comparing the Clinical Performance of High-Dose and Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloons for Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Results of the SATELLITE Study.","authors":"Naoki Yoshioka, Takahiro Tokuda, Akiko Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojima, Kohei Yamaguchi, Takashi Yanagiuchi, Kenji Ogata, Tatsuro Takei, Yasuhiro Morita, Tatsuya Nakama, Itsuro Morishima","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown comparable outcomes between first-generation high-dose drug-coated balloon (HD-DCB) and second-generation low-dose drug-coated balloon (LD-DCB) for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, data about the clinical performances of these DCBs for longer lesions in real-world clinical settings are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, retrospective study, the clinical performances of the HD-DCB (IN.PACT, Medtronic, MN, USA) and the LD-DCB (Ranger, Boston, MA, USA) were assessed in cases of femoropopliteal artery disease with lesion length ≥ 150 mm. From the database, 288 lesions in 288 patients were assigned to the HD-DCB group, and 88 lesions in 88 patients were assigned to the LD-DCB group. Propensity score-matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline patient and lesion characteristics. The primary outcome was the 2-year primary patency rate of the two types of DCBs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching was used to extract 76 pairs with no significant intergroup differences in baseline patient and lesion characteristics. The average lesion length was 257.5 and 255.7 mm in the HD and LD-DCB groups, respectively. The 2-year primary patency rates between the HD and LD-DCB groups were comparable (68.5% vs. 60.4%; p = 0.33). There were also no significant differences in clinically driven target lesion revascularization, acute limb ischemia, major amputation, or overall survival between the two types of DCBs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical outcomes between the HD and LD-DCBs did not significantly differ in real-world populations with severely complex lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown comparable outcomes between first-generation high-dose drug-coated balloon (HD-DCB) and second-generation low-dose drug-coated balloon (LD-DCB) for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, data about the clinical performances of these DCBs for longer lesions in real-world clinical settings are limited.

Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, the clinical performances of the HD-DCB (IN.PACT, Medtronic, MN, USA) and the LD-DCB (Ranger, Boston, MA, USA) were assessed in cases of femoropopliteal artery disease with lesion length ≥ 150 mm. From the database, 288 lesions in 288 patients were assigned to the HD-DCB group, and 88 lesions in 88 patients were assigned to the LD-DCB group. Propensity score-matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline patient and lesion characteristics. The primary outcome was the 2-year primary patency rate of the two types of DCBs.

Results: Propensity score matching was used to extract 76 pairs with no significant intergroup differences in baseline patient and lesion characteristics. The average lesion length was 257.5 and 255.7 mm in the HD and LD-DCB groups, respectively. The 2-year primary patency rates between the HD and LD-DCB groups were comparable (68.5% vs. 60.4%; p = 0.33). There were also no significant differences in clinically driven target lesion revascularization, acute limb ischemia, major amputation, or overall survival between the two types of DCBs.

Conclusion: The clinical outcomes between the HD and LD-DCBs did not significantly differ in real-world populations with severely complex lesions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信