Validation of an albumin-indocyanine green-based China liver cancer staging system to evaluating resectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients and comparison with the Child-Pugh-based China liver cancer staging system.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1450333
MinQiang Chen, Chao Ren, MengXia Wang, Min Yu, Bo Wu, Bo Zhuang, JianXiang Jin, YaoQi Zhang, ShiAn Yu
{"title":"Validation of an albumin-indocyanine green-based China liver cancer staging system to evaluating resectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients and comparison with the Child-Pugh-based China liver cancer staging system.","authors":"MinQiang Chen, Chao Ren, MengXia Wang, Min Yu, Bo Wu, Bo Zhuang, JianXiang Jin, YaoQi Zhang, ShiAn Yu","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1450333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Here, the utility of an albumin-indocyanine green-based China liver cancer (CNLC) staging system (ALICE-CNLC) as a tool for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients was evaluated, comparing this system to the Child-Pugh score-based CNLC staging system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort for this study included 331 patients with HCC who had undergone hepatectomy at Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital Medical Group in China from April 2012-June 2021 and had postoperative pathology-confirmed HCC. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, with log-rank tests used to examine prognostic factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for identification of outcome predictors using Cox proportional hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prediction of overall survival (OS) by the ALICE-CNLC system for patients with stage Ia disease was markedly better than that for patients with stage Ib and IIa disease (<i>P</i>=0.010, <i>P</i>=0.026), while the latter groups did not differ significantly (<i>P</i>=0.796). The ALICE-CNLC system predicted the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for patients with stage Ia, Ib, and IIa disease to be 50.4%, 47.7%, and 25%, respectively, with significant differences among the groups (<i>P=</i>0.033, <i>P</i><0.001, and <i>P=</i>0.043). These results were similar to those of the CNLC staging system.The OS and RFS did not differ significantly between the same grades of patients evaluated with the ALICE-CNLC and CNLC staging systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ALICE-CNLC and CNLC staging systems did not show significant differences in predicting the prognosis of patients with HCC who have undergone hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1450333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1450333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Here, the utility of an albumin-indocyanine green-based China liver cancer (CNLC) staging system (ALICE-CNLC) as a tool for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients was evaluated, comparing this system to the Child-Pugh score-based CNLC staging system.

Methods: The cohort for this study included 331 patients with HCC who had undergone hepatectomy at Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital Medical Group in China from April 2012-June 2021 and had postoperative pathology-confirmed HCC. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, with log-rank tests used to examine prognostic factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for identification of outcome predictors using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: The prediction of overall survival (OS) by the ALICE-CNLC system for patients with stage Ia disease was markedly better than that for patients with stage Ib and IIa disease (P=0.010, P=0.026), while the latter groups did not differ significantly (P=0.796). The ALICE-CNLC system predicted the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for patients with stage Ia, Ib, and IIa disease to be 50.4%, 47.7%, and 25%, respectively, with significant differences among the groups (P=0.033, P<0.001, and P=0.043). These results were similar to those of the CNLC staging system.The OS and RFS did not differ significantly between the same grades of patients evaluated with the ALICE-CNLC and CNLC staging systems.

Conclusion: The ALICE-CNLC and CNLC staging systems did not show significant differences in predicting the prognosis of patients with HCC who have undergone hepatectomy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信