Associations of social isolation with memory and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese adults

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ting Feng, Rui Qiang Li, Lin Xu
{"title":"Associations of social isolation with memory and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese adults","authors":"Ting Feng,&nbsp;Rui Qiang Li,&nbsp;Lin Xu","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-02987-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although social isolation has been identified as a risk factor for cognitive impairment, its potential impact relative to other documented risk factors has not been comprehensively quantified, leading to its underestimation in public health strategies. We aimed to address this gap by quantifying the contribution of social isolation to cognitive decline in the context of other risk factors.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Social isolation was evaluated using a modified Social Network Index (SNI) and cognitive function through the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Linear and logistic regression models were employed to analyze the associations between social isolation and cognitive outcomes, adjusting for demographic and health-related factors. Additionally, the XGBoost algorithm with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to quantify the relative importance of predictors.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 25,981 participants were recruited from 2003 to 2008. The mean age was 62.0 years, with 28.4% being men. Higher social isolation was significantly associated with lower DWRT (β=-0.15; 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.09) and MMSE scores (β=-0.34; 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.19), and higher odds of memory impairment (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.40) and poor cognitive function (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.99). XGBoost analysis ranked social isolation as the fifth most important predictor for MMSE scores (SHAP value = 0.175) and the eighth for memory impairment (SHAP value = 0.0133). Subgroup analyses indicated stronger associations among older adults, and individuals with lower education or manual occupation.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings showed that social isolation is an important risk factor for cognitive outcomes. This underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions addressing social isolation, alongside other key risk factors, to preserve cognitive health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-02987-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-02987-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although social isolation has been identified as a risk factor for cognitive impairment, its potential impact relative to other documented risk factors has not been comprehensively quantified, leading to its underestimation in public health strategies. We aimed to address this gap by quantifying the contribution of social isolation to cognitive decline in the context of other risk factors.

Methods

Social isolation was evaluated using a modified Social Network Index (SNI) and cognitive function through the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Linear and logistic regression models were employed to analyze the associations between social isolation and cognitive outcomes, adjusting for demographic and health-related factors. Additionally, the XGBoost algorithm with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to quantify the relative importance of predictors.

Results

A total of 25,981 participants were recruited from 2003 to 2008. The mean age was 62.0 years, with 28.4% being men. Higher social isolation was significantly associated with lower DWRT (β=-0.15; 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.09) and MMSE scores (β=-0.34; 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.19), and higher odds of memory impairment (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.40) and poor cognitive function (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.99). XGBoost analysis ranked social isolation as the fifth most important predictor for MMSE scores (SHAP value = 0.175) and the eighth for memory impairment (SHAP value = 0.0133). Subgroup analyses indicated stronger associations among older adults, and individuals with lower education or manual occupation.

Conclusion

Our findings showed that social isolation is an important risk factor for cognitive outcomes. This underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions addressing social isolation, alongside other key risk factors, to preserve cognitive health.

中国中老年人社会孤立与记忆和认知功能的关系
虽然社会孤立已被确定为认知障碍的一个风险因素,但其相对于其他记录在案的风险因素的潜在影响尚未得到全面量化,导致其在公共卫生战略中被低估。我们的目标是通过在其他风险因素的背景下量化社会孤立对认知能力下降的贡献来解决这一差距。方法采用改进的社会网络指数(SNI)评估社会隔离,并通过延迟单词回忆测验(DWRT)和简易精神状态测验(MMSE)评估认知功能。采用线性和逻辑回归模型分析社会隔离与认知结果之间的关系,并对人口统计学和健康相关因素进行调整。此外,使用带有SHapley加性解释(SHAP)的XGBoost算法来量化预测因子的相对重要性。结果2003 - 2008年共招募25,981名参与者。平均年龄为62.0岁,男性占28.4%。较高的社会隔离与较低的DWRT显著相关(β=-0.15;95% CI: -0.21 ~ -0.09)和MMSE评分(β=-0.34;95% CI: -0.48至-0.19),记忆障碍的几率更高(OR = 1.27;95% CI: 1.15 ~ 1.40)和认知功能差(OR = 1.56;95% CI: 1.23 ~ 1.99)。XGBoost分析将社会隔离列为MMSE得分的第五大重要预测因素(SHAP值= 0.175),记忆障碍的第八重要预测因素(SHAP值= 0.0133)。亚组分析表明,老年人、受教育程度较低或从事体力劳动的个体之间的相关性更强。结论社会孤立是影响认知结局的重要危险因素。这突出表明,迫切需要采取有针对性的公共卫生干预措施,解决社会孤立以及其他关键风险因素,以保持认知健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信