Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Klaartje de Weerdt, Maxime Ranger, Miriam E. Krüger, Ana Bergmann, Petter Hemstad, Andreas Leemann, Barbara Lothenbach
{"title":"Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution","authors":"Klaartje de Weerdt,&nbsp;Maxime Ranger,&nbsp;Miriam E. Krüger,&nbsp;Ana Bergmann,&nbsp;Petter Hemstad,&nbsp;Andreas Leemann,&nbsp;Barbara Lothenbach","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can mitigate alkali-silica reaction by lowering the alkali metal concentration in the pore solution. This is a theoretical study on the applicability of a thermodynamic model (GEMS) and the empirical Taylor model to predict the required replacement level of portland cement (PC) by SCMs to achieve an alkali metal concentration below 300 mmol/L. The SCMs investigated are silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), fly ash (FA) and slag. The impact of the alkali content of the PC and the w/b ratio on the required replacement level is modelled and compared to experimental pore solution concentrations. Both models predict a similar impact of the SCM replacement level on the distribution of alkali between the pore solution, C–S–H and unreacted material. The thermodynamic model predicts little impact of the alkali content of PC and the w/b-ratio on the required replacement level, i.e., 20% SF, 20% MK, 40–50% FA and 60–70% slag. This is contrary to the Taylor model, which predicts that the replacement levels of FA and slag ranges from 7 to 58% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93% and from 80 to 10%, when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The required replacement levels for SF and MK vary between 2 and 19% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93%, and from 40 to &lt; 5% when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The main difference between the two models is how they account for the uptake of alkali metals by the C–S–H.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can mitigate alkali-silica reaction by lowering the alkali metal concentration in the pore solution. This is a theoretical study on the applicability of a thermodynamic model (GEMS) and the empirical Taylor model to predict the required replacement level of portland cement (PC) by SCMs to achieve an alkali metal concentration below 300 mmol/L. The SCMs investigated are silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), fly ash (FA) and slag. The impact of the alkali content of the PC and the w/b ratio on the required replacement level is modelled and compared to experimental pore solution concentrations. Both models predict a similar impact of the SCM replacement level on the distribution of alkali between the pore solution, C–S–H and unreacted material. The thermodynamic model predicts little impact of the alkali content of PC and the w/b-ratio on the required replacement level, i.e., 20% SF, 20% MK, 40–50% FA and 60–70% slag. This is contrary to the Taylor model, which predicts that the replacement levels of FA and slag ranges from 7 to 58% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93% and from 80 to 10%, when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The required replacement levels for SF and MK vary between 2 and 19% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93%, and from 40 to < 5% when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The main difference between the two models is how they account for the uptake of alkali metals by the C–S–H.

RILEM TC 301-ASR报告:模拟SCMs,碱水平和w/b比对孔隙溶液中碱浓度的影响
补充胶凝材料(SCMs)可以通过降低孔隙溶液中碱金属的浓度来减缓碱-硅反应。这是一项关于热力学模型(GEMS)和经验Taylor模型的适用性的理论研究,用于预测用scm替代波特兰水泥(PC)所需的水平,以实现低于300 mmol/L的碱金属浓度。所研究的SCMs有硅灰(SF)、偏高岭土(MK)、粉煤灰(FA)和矿渣。模拟了PC的碱含量和w/b比对所需替代水平的影响,并与实验孔隙溶液浓度进行了比较。两种模型都预测了SCM替代水平对孔溶液、C-S-H和未反应物质之间碱分布的相似影响。热力学模型预测,PC的碱含量和w/b比对所需的替代水平(20% SF、20% MK、40-50% FA和60-70%炉渣)影响不大。Taylor模型预测碱含量从0.47增加到0.93%时,FA和渣的替代水平为7% ~ 58%,w/b比从0.3增加到0.9时,FA和渣的替代水平为80% ~ 10%。当碱含量从0.47增加到0.93%时,SF和MK的需要量在2% ~ 19%之间,当w/b比从0.3增加到0.9时,需要量在40% ~ 5%之间。这两种模型的主要区别在于它们如何解释碳- s -氢对碱金属的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信