Predicting backbreak due to blasting using LSSVM optimized by metaheuristic algorithms

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Niaz Muhammad Shahani, Xigui Zheng
{"title":"Predicting backbreak due to blasting using LSSVM optimized by metaheuristic algorithms","authors":"Niaz Muhammad Shahani,&nbsp;Xigui Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12170-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Backbreak is an undesirable outcome in blasting operations caused by factors such as equipment failure, improper fragmentation, unstable mine walls, reduced drilling efficiency, and other issues that contribute to increased mining operation costs. To overcome these problems effectively, this study developed a least square support vector machine (LSSVM) model and optimized it using metaheuristic algorithms, including genetic algorithm (GA)-LSSVM, particle swarm optimization (PSO)-LSSVM, and grey wolf optimization (GWO)-LSSVM, to predict the efficiency and accuracy of backbreak due to blasting in surface mines using burden (m), spacing (m), stemming (m), powder factor (kg/m<sup>s</sup>), and stiffness ratio (m/m) as input parameters. Among the models evaluated, the GWO-LSSVM model demonstrated superior performance compared to the LSSVM, GA-LSSVM, and PSO-LSSVM models, achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.998 and 0.997, mean absolute error of 0.0068 and 0.1209, root mean squared error of 0.0825 and 0.1936, and SI of 0.021 and 0.044 on the training and testing datasets, respectively. Sensitivity analysis of the GWO-LSSVM model revealed that the powder factor exerted the most significant influence, while the burden had the least impact on backbreak. This developed method has proven to significantly enhance the performance evaluation of backbreak in surface mines and offers valuable engineering applications in mining and other related fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12170-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backbreak is an undesirable outcome in blasting operations caused by factors such as equipment failure, improper fragmentation, unstable mine walls, reduced drilling efficiency, and other issues that contribute to increased mining operation costs. To overcome these problems effectively, this study developed a least square support vector machine (LSSVM) model and optimized it using metaheuristic algorithms, including genetic algorithm (GA)-LSSVM, particle swarm optimization (PSO)-LSSVM, and grey wolf optimization (GWO)-LSSVM, to predict the efficiency and accuracy of backbreak due to blasting in surface mines using burden (m), spacing (m), stemming (m), powder factor (kg/ms), and stiffness ratio (m/m) as input parameters. Among the models evaluated, the GWO-LSSVM model demonstrated superior performance compared to the LSSVM, GA-LSSVM, and PSO-LSSVM models, achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.998 and 0.997, mean absolute error of 0.0068 and 0.1209, root mean squared error of 0.0825 and 0.1936, and SI of 0.021 and 0.044 on the training and testing datasets, respectively. Sensitivity analysis of the GWO-LSSVM model revealed that the powder factor exerted the most significant influence, while the burden had the least impact on backbreak. This developed method has proven to significantly enhance the performance evaluation of backbreak in surface mines and offers valuable engineering applications in mining and other related fields.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信