Radar Vehicle Signatures: Comparison of Up-to-Date Automotive Radar Sensors With Different Characteristics

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Philip Aust;Florian Hau;Jürgen Dickmann;Matthias A. Hein
{"title":"Radar Vehicle Signatures: Comparison of Up-to-Date Automotive Radar Sensors With Different Characteristics","authors":"Philip Aust;Florian Hau;Jürgen Dickmann;Matthias A. Hein","doi":"10.1109/LSENS.2025.3544457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing angular resolution of modern automotive radar sensors enables a more detailed and more accurate perception of the environment. This has implications for the measured target detections of extended objects, such as vehicles, which cause complex backscatter signatures. Simulation-based approaches strive to enable efficient testing concepts, but require high-fidelity sensor models. To assess the impact of different sensors on the virtual replication of sensor data, it is important to examine the variations between measurements from various sensors. In this letter, radar detections of a passenger vehicle using three radars with different characteristics are presented. Similarities between the spatial distributions of the detections are revealed and differences in the number of target detections, and the accuracy of their localization within the bounding box of the vehicle are identified. Furthermore, the spatial fluctuations of point clouds between succeeding measurement cycles are investigated. The results suggest that existing data-driven modeling approaches can be applied to different sensors as well, but that particular attention must be paid to the distinct spatial spread of the detections and to the fluctuations of point clouds.","PeriodicalId":13014,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Letters","volume":"9 3","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10897907/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing angular resolution of modern automotive radar sensors enables a more detailed and more accurate perception of the environment. This has implications for the measured target detections of extended objects, such as vehicles, which cause complex backscatter signatures. Simulation-based approaches strive to enable efficient testing concepts, but require high-fidelity sensor models. To assess the impact of different sensors on the virtual replication of sensor data, it is important to examine the variations between measurements from various sensors. In this letter, radar detections of a passenger vehicle using three radars with different characteristics are presented. Similarities between the spatial distributions of the detections are revealed and differences in the number of target detections, and the accuracy of their localization within the bounding box of the vehicle are identified. Furthermore, the spatial fluctuations of point clouds between succeeding measurement cycles are investigated. The results suggest that existing data-driven modeling approaches can be applied to different sensors as well, but that particular attention must be paid to the distinct spatial spread of the detections and to the fluctuations of point clouds.
现代汽车雷达传感器的角度分辨率不断提高,能够更详细、更准确地感知环境。这对车辆等延伸物体的测量目标探测产生了影响,因为这些物体会产生复杂的反向散射信号。基于仿真的方法致力于实现高效的测试概念,但需要高保真的传感器模型。为了评估不同传感器对虚拟复制传感器数据的影响,必须检查不同传感器测量结果之间的差异。在这封信中,介绍了使用三种具有不同特性的雷达对一辆客车进行雷达探测的情况。文中揭示了探测结果空间分布的相似性,并确定了目标探测数量的差异以及在车辆包围圈内定位精度的差异。此外,还研究了连续测量周期之间点云的空间波动。研究结果表明,现有的数据驱动建模方法也可应用于不同的传感器,但必须特别注意探测的不同空间分布和点云的波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Letters
IEEE Sensors Letters Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
194
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信