A review of psychedelics trials completed in depression, informed by European regulatory perspectives

Francisca Silva , Florence Butlen-Ducuing , Lorenzo Guizzaro , Pavel Balabanov
{"title":"A review of psychedelics trials completed in depression, informed by European regulatory perspectives","authors":"Francisca Silva ,&nbsp;Florence Butlen-Ducuing ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Guizzaro ,&nbsp;Pavel Balabanov","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2025.105516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a growing body of clinical research on the therapeutic potential of psychedelics for the treatment of mental health disorders, notably depression. Accordingly, the new revision of the European Medicines Agency guideline on the clinical investigation of products for depression will incorporate a section covering specific regulatory recommendations for the design of studies with psychedelics. The present review investigated the methodological approaches adopted in completed controlled trials of psychedelics for depression in light of initial considerations included in the draft guideline revision. A systematic search conducted on scientific databases (Embase and Medline) and clinical trial registries (<span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> and WHO ICTPR) identified 8 completed trials as of February 2024. The trials tested psilocybin, LSD, Ayahuasca, and DMT, for major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression, and were all pahse 2 or 1/2. Patterns in pre-defined methodological variables pertaining to trial design, population, interventions, outcome measures and safety assessments were analysed and collated against considerations on unblinding and expectancy, choice of comparator, the definition of treatment frameworks, the characterisation of the subjective psychedelic experience and the specification of adverse events in relation to subjective psychedelic effects. Areas for future research, including long-term efficacy and safety and the influence of inter-individual differences, can be investigated in larger studies, necessary for marketing authorisation applications. Ultimately, balancing the intricacies of conducting trials with psychedelics with ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements can be facilitated by early dialogue with medicines regulators, and will be essential for the medical development of psychedelics to address unmet patient needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 105516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408525001085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing body of clinical research on the therapeutic potential of psychedelics for the treatment of mental health disorders, notably depression. Accordingly, the new revision of the European Medicines Agency guideline on the clinical investigation of products for depression will incorporate a section covering specific regulatory recommendations for the design of studies with psychedelics. The present review investigated the methodological approaches adopted in completed controlled trials of psychedelics for depression in light of initial considerations included in the draft guideline revision. A systematic search conducted on scientific databases (Embase and Medline) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTPR) identified 8 completed trials as of February 2024. The trials tested psilocybin, LSD, Ayahuasca, and DMT, for major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression, and were all pahse 2 or 1/2. Patterns in pre-defined methodological variables pertaining to trial design, population, interventions, outcome measures and safety assessments were analysed and collated against considerations on unblinding and expectancy, choice of comparator, the definition of treatment frameworks, the characterisation of the subjective psychedelic experience and the specification of adverse events in relation to subjective psychedelic effects. Areas for future research, including long-term efficacy and safety and the influence of inter-individual differences, can be investigated in larger studies, necessary for marketing authorisation applications. Ultimately, balancing the intricacies of conducting trials with psychedelics with ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements can be facilitated by early dialogue with medicines regulators, and will be essential for the medical development of psychedelics to address unmet patient needs.
根据欧洲监管机构的观点,回顾已完成的抑郁症迷幻药试验
越来越多的临床研究表明,迷幻药在治疗精神疾病,特别是抑郁症方面具有治疗潜力。因此,欧洲药品管理局关于抑郁症产品临床研究指南的新修订将纳入一个章节,涵盖致幻剂研究设计的具体监管建议。根据指南修订草案中包含的初步考虑,本综述调查了迷幻药治疗抑郁症的完整对照试验中采用的方法学方法。对科学数据库(Embase和Medline)和临床试验登记处(clinicaltrials.gov和WHO ICTPR)进行的系统检索确定了截至2024年2月完成的8项试验。这些试验测试了裸盖菇素、LSD、死藤水和DMT对重度抑郁症或难治性抑郁症的治疗效果,结果都是2或1/2阶段。与试验设计、人口、干预措施、结果测量和安全评估相关的预定义方法变量的模式被分析和整理,以考虑解盲和期望、比较器的选择、治疗框架的定义、主观迷幻体验的特征和与主观迷幻效应相关的不良事件的说明。未来研究的领域,包括长期疗效和安全性以及个体间差异的影响,可以在更大规模的研究中进行调查,这是上市许可申请所必需的。最终,通过与药品监管机构的早期对话,可以促进在进行致幻剂试验的复杂性与确保遵守监管要求之间取得平衡,并且对于致幻剂的医学开发以解决未满足的患者需求至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信