Comparative evaluation of sealing potential of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and bio-C repair in furcation perforations: A glucose penetration study.

Ashwija Shetty, Hajira Anjum Sultana, A Srirekha, C Champa, Suditi Pal, V Sahithi
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of sealing potential of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and bio-C repair in furcation perforations: A glucose penetration study.","authors":"Ashwija Shetty, Hajira Anjum Sultana, A Srirekha, C Champa, Suditi Pal, V Sahithi","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_749_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Furcation perforation is a common dental issue that can result in substantial tooth loss if not repaired with a material that effectively seals the area. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine have been previously studied for their sealing capabilities, but Bio-C Repair is a relatively new material that is yet to be evaluated. This study sought to compare and evaluate the sealing potential of MTA, Biodentine, and Bio-C Repair as furcation perforation repair materials using the glucose penetration method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five mandibular molars were sectioned 3 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Access openings were prepared, and intentional perforations were created in the pulpal floor using a round bur. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 15. Group 1 was repaired with MTA, Group 2 with Biodentine, and Group 3 with Bio-C Repair. The sealing potential was evaluated using a glucose penetration test. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test results demonstrated that glucose penetration was significantly least in Group 3 (1.5313), followed by Group 1 (8.2208) and highest in Group 2 (8.5622) at <i>P</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the study's limitations, Bio-C Repair exhibited the best sealing ability for furcation perforations, followed by MTA and then Biodentine. Therefore, Bio-C Repair could be a suitable alternative to MTA and Biodentine for repairing furcal perforations.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 2","pages":"144-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_749_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Furcation perforation is a common dental issue that can result in substantial tooth loss if not repaired with a material that effectively seals the area. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine have been previously studied for their sealing capabilities, but Bio-C Repair is a relatively new material that is yet to be evaluated. This study sought to compare and evaluate the sealing potential of MTA, Biodentine, and Bio-C Repair as furcation perforation repair materials using the glucose penetration method.

Materials and methods: Forty-five mandibular molars were sectioned 3 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Access openings were prepared, and intentional perforations were created in the pulpal floor using a round bur. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 15. Group 1 was repaired with MTA, Group 2 with Biodentine, and Group 3 with Bio-C Repair. The sealing potential was evaluated using a glucose penetration test. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test.

Results: The test results demonstrated that glucose penetration was significantly least in Group 3 (1.5313), followed by Group 1 (8.2208) and highest in Group 2 (8.5622) at P < 0.001.

Conclusions: Within the study's limitations, Bio-C Repair exhibited the best sealing ability for furcation perforations, followed by MTA and then Biodentine. Therefore, Bio-C Repair could be a suitable alternative to MTA and Biodentine for repairing furcal perforations.

三氧化矿物聚集体、生物牙石和生物c修复在功能孔中的封闭电位的比较评价:葡萄糖渗透研究。
牙槽穿孔是一种常见的牙齿问题,如果不使用有效密封该区域的材料进行修复,可能导致大量牙齿脱落。矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)和生物牙石之前已经研究过它们的密封能力,但生物c修复是一种相对较新的材料,尚未进行评估。本研究试图通过葡萄糖渗透法比较和评估MTA、Biodentine和Bio-C Repair作为功能穿孔修复材料的密封潜力。材料和方法:45颗下颌磨牙在牙骨质-牙釉质交界处上方3mm处切片。准备了通道开口,并使用圆形bur在髓底创建了有意的穿孔。将标本随机分为三组,每组15例。组1采用MTA修复,组2采用Biodentine修复,组3采用Bio-C修复。采用葡萄糖渗透试验评估密封电位。数据分析采用单向方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果:实验结果显示,葡萄糖渗透在3组中最低(1.5313),1组次之(8.2208),2组最高(8.5622)(P < 0.001)。结论:在研究的限制范围内,Bio-C Repair对分叉穿孔的封堵能力最好,其次是MTA,然后是Biodentine。因此,Bio-C Repair可能是MTA和Biodentine修复分叉穿孔的合适选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信