Bacteriophage Dosing and Its Effect on Bacterial Growth Suppression in a Staphylococcus epidermidis Model: An In Vitro Study.

PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1089/phage.2024.0001
Jason Young, Mohammad Javad Shariyate, Ahmad Hedayatzadeh Razavi, Ara Nazarian, Edward K Rodriguez
{"title":"Bacteriophage Dosing and Its Effect on Bacterial Growth Suppression in a <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> Model: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Jason Young, Mohammad Javad Shariyate, Ahmad Hedayatzadeh Razavi, Ara Nazarian, Edward K Rodriguez","doi":"10.1089/phage.2024.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phages are an emerging therapy in the treatment of prosthetic joint infections, though many challenges remain, including an incomplete understanding of optimal phage dosing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed an <i>in vitro</i> assessment of how phage dosing as measured by multiplicity of infection (MOI) impacts bacterial growth in planktonic and biofilm conditions using a <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> model. <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> ATCC 35984 was combined in planktonic and biofilm forms with phage vB_SepM_Alex at varying concentrations, and growth was monitored via spectrophotometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Planktonic bacterial growth was significantly higher when MOI ≤ 0.01 compared with MOI ≥ 10 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Biofilms with phage dosing at ≤ 10<sup>4</sup> plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL had significantly greater spectrophotometer readings than those dosed at 10<sup>10</sup> PFU/mL (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest lower, not higher, phage dosing is associated with greater bacterial persistence. Our study helps inform the dosing and delivery of this alternative form of antibiosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74428,"journal":{"name":"PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 4","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/phage.2024.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phages are an emerging therapy in the treatment of prosthetic joint infections, though many challenges remain, including an incomplete understanding of optimal phage dosing.

Materials and methods: We performed an in vitro assessment of how phage dosing as measured by multiplicity of infection (MOI) impacts bacterial growth in planktonic and biofilm conditions using a Staphylococcus epidermidis model. Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 was combined in planktonic and biofilm forms with phage vB_SepM_Alex at varying concentrations, and growth was monitored via spectrophotometry.

Results: Planktonic bacterial growth was significantly higher when MOI ≤ 0.01 compared with MOI ≥ 10 (p < 0.05). Biofilms with phage dosing at ≤ 104 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL had significantly greater spectrophotometer readings than those dosed at 1010 PFU/mL (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest lower, not higher, phage dosing is associated with greater bacterial persistence. Our study helps inform the dosing and delivery of this alternative form of antibiosis.

噬菌体剂量及其对表皮葡萄球菌模型细菌生长抑制作用的体外研究
背景:噬菌体是治疗假体关节感染的一种新兴疗法,尽管仍存在许多挑战,包括对最佳噬菌体剂量的不完全了解。材料和方法:我们使用表皮葡萄球菌模型对浮游和生物膜条件下噬菌体剂量(通过感染多样性(MOI)测量)如何影响细菌生长进行了体外评估。将表皮葡萄球菌ATCC 35984与噬菌体vB_SepM_Alex以不同浓度的浮游和生物膜形式结合,通过分光光度法监测其生长情况。结果:与MOI≥10相比,MOI≤0.01时浮游细菌生长显著增加(p < 0.05)。噬菌体剂量≤104 PFU/mL的生物膜的分光光度计读数显著高于1010 PFU/mL的生物膜(p < 0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,较低而不是较高的噬菌体剂量与较强的细菌持久性相关。我们的研究有助于告知这种替代形式的抗生素的剂量和递送。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信