The Effect of Aerobic or Strength Training in Elderly with Cognitive Decline: The Fit4Alz Project.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Ana Filipa Silva, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Mafalda Sofia Roriz, José Alberto Azevedo, Olivera Jovanovic, Marko Adamovic, Aleksandar Bozic, Rui Silva
{"title":"The Effect of Aerobic or Strength Training in Elderly with Cognitive Decline: The Fit4Alz Project.","authors":"Ana Filipa Silva, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Mafalda Sofia Roriz, José Alberto Azevedo, Olivera Jovanovic, Marko Adamovic, Aleksandar Bozic, Rui Silva","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the effects of aerobic and strength training methodologies, either combined with or without cognitive training, on mitigating cognitive decline. A total of 154 subjects were recruited (72.8 ± 6.1 years, 69% females) and were divided into four groups: i) strength plus cognitive training (STCT, n = 56); ii) strength training (ST, n = 23); iii) aerobic training (AT, n = 41); and iv) aerobic plus cognitive training (ATCT, n = 34). Subjects were previously cognitively assessed and showed cognitive decline (less than 26 points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA). For 12 weeks, all groups performed 3 times a week, for 60 minutes, a training program corresponding to their attributed group. The MoCA test and the Senior Fitness test were applied at the beginning and the end of the intervention. A repeated-measures ANCOVA revealed significant time-by-group interactions for physical performance measures, including the 2-minute step-in-place (p = 0.026), arm curl (p < 0.001), chair sit-and-reach (p < 0.001), back-scratch (p < 0.001), 8-foot up-and-go (p < 0.001), and 6-minute walk tests (p < 0.001). However, no significant improvements were observed for cognitive function (MoCA, p = 0.242) or lower body strength (chair stand, p = 0.411). The AT group showed greater improvements in upper body strength compared to STCT and ST (p < 0.001; d = 0.698; p = 0.004; d = 0.598), while STCT significantly improved flexibility compared to ATCT (p < 0.001; d = 1.049). ATCT had the greatest improvements in aerobic endurance compared to STCT and ST (p = 0.004; d = 0.133; p < 0.001; d = 0.350). It was demonstrated that aerobic and strength training significantly improved overall physical performance in elderly individuals. However, no significant effects were observed on cognitive performance. Although these findings suggest that both aerobic and strength exercise, with or without cognitive training, improve overall physical fitness, further research is needed to determine its impact on cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"172-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effects of aerobic and strength training methodologies, either combined with or without cognitive training, on mitigating cognitive decline. A total of 154 subjects were recruited (72.8 ± 6.1 years, 69% females) and were divided into four groups: i) strength plus cognitive training (STCT, n = 56); ii) strength training (ST, n = 23); iii) aerobic training (AT, n = 41); and iv) aerobic plus cognitive training (ATCT, n = 34). Subjects were previously cognitively assessed and showed cognitive decline (less than 26 points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA). For 12 weeks, all groups performed 3 times a week, for 60 minutes, a training program corresponding to their attributed group. The MoCA test and the Senior Fitness test were applied at the beginning and the end of the intervention. A repeated-measures ANCOVA revealed significant time-by-group interactions for physical performance measures, including the 2-minute step-in-place (p = 0.026), arm curl (p < 0.001), chair sit-and-reach (p < 0.001), back-scratch (p < 0.001), 8-foot up-and-go (p < 0.001), and 6-minute walk tests (p < 0.001). However, no significant improvements were observed for cognitive function (MoCA, p = 0.242) or lower body strength (chair stand, p = 0.411). The AT group showed greater improvements in upper body strength compared to STCT and ST (p < 0.001; d = 0.698; p = 0.004; d = 0.598), while STCT significantly improved flexibility compared to ATCT (p < 0.001; d = 1.049). ATCT had the greatest improvements in aerobic endurance compared to STCT and ST (p = 0.004; d = 0.133; p < 0.001; d = 0.350). It was demonstrated that aerobic and strength training significantly improved overall physical performance in elderly individuals. However, no significant effects were observed on cognitive performance. Although these findings suggest that both aerobic and strength exercise, with or without cognitive training, improve overall physical fitness, further research is needed to determine its impact on cognitive performance.

有氧或力量训练对认知能力衰退老人的影响:Fit4Alz 项目
本研究旨在研究有氧和力量训练方法,无论是结合或不结合认知训练,对减轻认知能力下降的影响。共招募154名受试者(72.8±6.1岁,69%为女性),分为4组:i)力量加认知训练组(STCT, n = 56);ii)力量训练(ST, n = 23);iii)有氧训练(AT, n = 41);iv)有氧加认知训练(ATCT, n = 34)。受试者先前进行认知评估,并显示认知能力下降(蒙特利尔认知评估,MoCA少于26分)。在12周的时间里,所有组每周进行3次,每次60分钟,这是一个与他们所属组相对应的训练计划。在干预开始和结束时分别进行MoCA测试和老年人体能测试。重复测量的ANCOVA显示了物理表现测量的显著时间组相互作用,包括2分钟的原地踏步(p = 0.026),手臂弯曲(p < 0.001),椅子坐着伸展(p < 0.001),背部抓伤(p < 0.001), 8英尺的起身和走(p < 0.001)和6分钟的步行测试(p < 0.001)。然而,没有观察到认知功能(MoCA, p = 0.242)或下肢力量(椅子站立,p = 0.411)的显著改善。与STCT和ST相比,AT组上肢力量的改善更大(p < 0.001;D = 0.698;P = 0.004;d = 0.598),而与ATCT相比,STCT显著提高了灵活性(p < 0.001;D = 1.049)。与STCT和ST相比,ATCT对有氧耐力的改善最大(p = 0.004;D = 0.133;P < 0.001;D = 0.350)。结果表明,有氧和力量训练显著提高了老年人的整体体能表现。然而,在认知表现方面没有观察到明显的影响。尽管这些研究结果表明,有氧运动和力量运动,无论是否进行认知训练,都能提高整体体能,但还需要进一步的研究来确定其对认知表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信