Experiences of Australian transgender, gender-diverse and non-binary patients accessing and receiving gender-affirming care.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mary Stewart, Aman Bedi, Dash Gray, Joseph Cotter, Catriona Ooi
{"title":"Experiences of Australian transgender, gender-diverse and non-binary patients accessing and receiving gender-affirming care.","authors":"Mary Stewart, Aman Bedi, Dash Gray, Joseph Cotter, Catriona Ooi","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-06-24-7324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>It is important for general practitioners (GPs) to understand the barriers and facilitators that transgender, gender-diverse and non-binary patients (TGDNB) experience when accessing health care. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of patients accessing and receiving gender-affirming care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients who attended a sexual health clinic for gender-affirming care (GAC) were invited to participate in a feedback questionnaire that explored the referral process, access to care and perceptions of the clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Few patients found out about the service from their GP. Many patients had difficulty accessing GAC but, once aware of services, most had no difficulty obtaining a GP referral. Difficulties accessing GAC included a lack of knowledge from medical professionals, lengthy and complicated processes, cost, confidentiality concerns and being misgendered. Patients found inclusive signage helpful and appreciated being asked about pronouns and chosen name. There was a high level of satisfaction with GAC.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GPs should be aware of strategies to ensure TGDNB patients feel safe accessing healthcare, including the availability of specialist services and referral pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 3","pages":"143-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-06-24-7324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: It is important for general practitioners (GPs) to understand the barriers and facilitators that transgender, gender-diverse and non-binary patients (TGDNB) experience when accessing health care. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of patients accessing and receiving gender-affirming care.

Method: Patients who attended a sexual health clinic for gender-affirming care (GAC) were invited to participate in a feedback questionnaire that explored the referral process, access to care and perceptions of the clinic.

Results: Few patients found out about the service from their GP. Many patients had difficulty accessing GAC but, once aware of services, most had no difficulty obtaining a GP referral. Difficulties accessing GAC included a lack of knowledge from medical professionals, lengthy and complicated processes, cost, confidentiality concerns and being misgendered. Patients found inclusive signage helpful and appreciated being asked about pronouns and chosen name. There was a high level of satisfaction with GAC.

Discussion: GPs should be aware of strategies to ensure TGDNB patients feel safe accessing healthcare, including the availability of specialist services and referral pathways.

澳大利亚跨性别、多元性别和非二元性别患者获得和接受性别确认护理的经验。
背景和目标:对于全科医生(gp)来说,了解跨性别、性别多样化和非二元患者(TGDNB)在获得医疗保健时遇到的障碍和促进因素非常重要。本研究的目的是探讨患者获得和接受性别肯定护理的经验。方法:邀请到性健康诊所接受性别确认护理(GAC)的患者参与一份反馈问卷,探讨转诊过程、获得护理的机会和对诊所的看法。结果:很少有患者从他们的全科医生那里了解到这项服务。许多患者难以获得GAC,但一旦意识到服务,大多数人都没有困难获得全科医生转诊。获得GAC的困难包括缺乏医疗专业人员的知识、冗长而复杂的程序、费用、保密问题以及性别错误。患者发现包容性的标识很有帮助,并感谢被问及代词和选择的名字。对GAC的满意度很高。讨论:全科医生应该了解确保TGDNB患者安全获得医疗保健的策略,包括专家服务和转诊途径的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信