Mucolytic Therapy in COPD: Patient Usage and Preferences in Real-World Italian Settings.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Salvatore D'Antonio, Alfio Pennisi, Mario Cazzola
{"title":"Mucolytic Therapy in COPD: Patient Usage and Preferences in Real-World Italian Settings.","authors":"Salvatore D'Antonio, Alfio Pennisi, Mario Cazzola","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S504577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Italian COPD Patient Association (Associazione Pazienti BPCO) conducted an online survey among its 2814 members with COPD to investigate the reasons for the widespread use of mucolytic therapies by patients, often including self-prescription using over the counter (OTC) alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After consulting with several respiratory specialists, the Association's steering committee developed a list of nine questions with possible answers that was posted on the website of the Association. The survey was open to all members of the Association, with responses to be e-mailed to the Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 78% the 502 participants surveyed reported having used mucolytics in the previous six months, with 54.5% using prescribed medications and 23.5% opting for OTC medications. Usage patterns revealed that 43.4% utilized mucolytics during episodes of excessive mucus, while 35.5% used them regardless of the presence of mucus. In terms of formulation preferences, water-soluble granulated sachets (34.9%) and effervescent/dispersible tablets (22.8%) were the most preferred, followed by capsules (14.1%) and aerosol ampoules (11.2%). The factors influencing these preferences were the hydration benefits of sachets and tablets, the portability and taste advantages of capsules, and the swallowing difficulties of aerosol formulations. The data showed that 26.5% of survey participants consumed the entire contents of the prescribed or OTC package, while 19.9% utilised it for a minimum of 10 days, 31.5% for a period between 5 and 10 days, and 10.2% for less than 5 days. Cost was cited as a reason for discontinuation by 8.3% of participants. Notably, 29.5% of respondents believed that mucolytic efficacy was dependent on the amount of mucus. Most patients (66.3%) used mucolytics at home, and 57.4% took the medication once daily and 24.3% twice daily. Additionally, 41.8% were aware of the dual antioxidant and mucolytic properties of the medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings emphisise the need for a patient-centred approach, encouraging healthcare providers to consider individual preferences and offer personalised advice that has the potential to improve adherence and overall outcomes for COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S504577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Italian COPD Patient Association (Associazione Pazienti BPCO) conducted an online survey among its 2814 members with COPD to investigate the reasons for the widespread use of mucolytic therapies by patients, often including self-prescription using over the counter (OTC) alternatives.

Methods: After consulting with several respiratory specialists, the Association's steering committee developed a list of nine questions with possible answers that was posted on the website of the Association. The survey was open to all members of the Association, with responses to be e-mailed to the Association.

Results: Approximately 78% the 502 participants surveyed reported having used mucolytics in the previous six months, with 54.5% using prescribed medications and 23.5% opting for OTC medications. Usage patterns revealed that 43.4% utilized mucolytics during episodes of excessive mucus, while 35.5% used them regardless of the presence of mucus. In terms of formulation preferences, water-soluble granulated sachets (34.9%) and effervescent/dispersible tablets (22.8%) were the most preferred, followed by capsules (14.1%) and aerosol ampoules (11.2%). The factors influencing these preferences were the hydration benefits of sachets and tablets, the portability and taste advantages of capsules, and the swallowing difficulties of aerosol formulations. The data showed that 26.5% of survey participants consumed the entire contents of the prescribed or OTC package, while 19.9% utilised it for a minimum of 10 days, 31.5% for a period between 5 and 10 days, and 10.2% for less than 5 days. Cost was cited as a reason for discontinuation by 8.3% of participants. Notably, 29.5% of respondents believed that mucolytic efficacy was dependent on the amount of mucus. Most patients (66.3%) used mucolytics at home, and 57.4% took the medication once daily and 24.3% twice daily. Additionally, 41.8% were aware of the dual antioxidant and mucolytic properties of the medication.

Conclusion: These findings emphisise the need for a patient-centred approach, encouraging healthcare providers to consider individual preferences and offer personalised advice that has the potential to improve adherence and overall outcomes for COPD patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信