Transforming hematological research documentation with large language models: an approach to scientific writing and data analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
John Jeongseok Yang, Sang-Hyun Hwang
{"title":"Transforming hematological research documentation with large language models: an approach to scientific writing and data analysis.","authors":"John Jeongseok Yang, Sang-Hyun Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s44313-025-00062-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT (OpenAI, CA, US), have revolutionized scientific writing and research processes across academic disciplines, providing comprehensive support throughout the entire research lifecycle. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools enhance every aspect of scientific writing, from hypothesis generation and methodology design to data analysis and manuscript preparation. This review examines the applications of LLMs in hematological research, with particular emphasis on advanced techniques, including prompt engineering and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) frameworks. Prompt engineering methods, including zero-shot and few-shot learning along with a chain-of-thought approach, enable researchers to generate more precise context-specific content, especially in scientific writing. Integrating RAG frameworks with the current medical literature and clinical guidelines significantly reduces the risk of misinformation while ensuring alignment with contemporary medical standards. Even though these GAI tools offer remarkable potential for streamlining research writing and enhancing documentation quality, the study also addresses the critical importance of maintaining scientific integrity, ethical considerations, and privacy concerns in hematological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00062-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT (OpenAI, CA, US), have revolutionized scientific writing and research processes across academic disciplines, providing comprehensive support throughout the entire research lifecycle. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools enhance every aspect of scientific writing, from hypothesis generation and methodology design to data analysis and manuscript preparation. This review examines the applications of LLMs in hematological research, with particular emphasis on advanced techniques, including prompt engineering and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) frameworks. Prompt engineering methods, including zero-shot and few-shot learning along with a chain-of-thought approach, enable researchers to generate more precise context-specific content, especially in scientific writing. Integrating RAG frameworks with the current medical literature and clinical guidelines significantly reduces the risk of misinformation while ensuring alignment with contemporary medical standards. Even though these GAI tools offer remarkable potential for streamlining research writing and enhancing documentation quality, the study also addresses the critical importance of maintaining scientific integrity, ethical considerations, and privacy concerns in hematological research.

转化血液学研究文献与大型语言模型:一种方法,以科学写作和数据分析。
大型语言模型(llm),如ChatGPT (OpenAI, CA, US),已经彻底改变了跨学科的科学写作和研究过程,在整个研究生命周期中提供全面的支持。生成式人工智能(GAI)工具增强了科学写作的各个方面,从假设生成和方法设计到数据分析和手稿准备。本文综述了法学硕士在血液学研究中的应用,特别强调了先进的技术,包括快速工程和检索增强生成(RAG)框架。快速的工程方法,包括零射击和少射击学习以及思维链方法,使研究人员能够生成更精确的上下文特定内容,特别是在科学写作中。将RAG框架与当前的医学文献和临床指南相结合,可显著降低错误信息的风险,同时确保与当代医学标准保持一致。尽管这些GAI工具在简化研究写作和提高文档质量方面提供了显著的潜力,但该研究也解决了在血液学研究中维护科学完整性、伦理考虑和隐私问题的关键重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信