No Impaired Inhibition of Stimulus-Driven Behavior in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Partial Test of the Habit Formation Model.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Adam Larsson, Stefan Möller, Sandra Andrekson, Gustav Nordin, Johannes Björkstrand, Matti Cervin
{"title":"No Impaired Inhibition of Stimulus-Driven Behavior in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Partial Test of the Habit Formation Model.","authors":"Adam Larsson, Stefan Möller, Sandra Andrekson, Gustav Nordin, Johannes Björkstrand, Matti Cervin","doi":"10.1007/s10802-025-01304-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms that underlie obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are elusive. The habit formation model of OCD postulates that compulsions arise from an imbalance between goal-directed and habit formation systems, stemming from impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven actions. Few studies have examined the core tenets of the habit formation model in pediatric OCD. We administered the object-interference task, which assesses the ability to inhibit stimulus-driven behavior, to 67 youths with OCD, 43 youths with an anxiety disorder (and no OCD), and 48 youths without any mental disorder. Impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven behavior was calculated by comparing response times to neutral non-nameable objects, neutral nameable objects, distress-eliciting objects, and incompleteness-eliciting objects. Youths with OCD did not differ significantly from youths with anxiety disorders and the non-clinical group on any response cost measure. All groups showed small response costs in relation to all three categories of non-neutral objects, with the clearest cost emerging in relation to distress-eliciting objects. Individual differences in response cost were not significantly correlated with any interview- or self-rated measure of OCD severity. Using the object-interference task, no evidence was found for impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven behavior in youths with OCD. We explore several possible interpretations of this result, including limitations of the task itself, the broader constraints of experimental methods in detecting such mechanisms, and the possibility that an imbalance between goal-directed and habit systems may not be a fundamental feature of pediatric OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"405-416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-025-01304-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanisms that underlie obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are elusive. The habit formation model of OCD postulates that compulsions arise from an imbalance between goal-directed and habit formation systems, stemming from impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven actions. Few studies have examined the core tenets of the habit formation model in pediatric OCD. We administered the object-interference task, which assesses the ability to inhibit stimulus-driven behavior, to 67 youths with OCD, 43 youths with an anxiety disorder (and no OCD), and 48 youths without any mental disorder. Impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven behavior was calculated by comparing response times to neutral non-nameable objects, neutral nameable objects, distress-eliciting objects, and incompleteness-eliciting objects. Youths with OCD did not differ significantly from youths with anxiety disorders and the non-clinical group on any response cost measure. All groups showed small response costs in relation to all three categories of non-neutral objects, with the clearest cost emerging in relation to distress-eliciting objects. Individual differences in response cost were not significantly correlated with any interview- or self-rated measure of OCD severity. Using the object-interference task, no evidence was found for impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven behavior in youths with OCD. We explore several possible interpretations of this result, including limitations of the task itself, the broader constraints of experimental methods in detecting such mechanisms, and the possibility that an imbalance between goal-directed and habit systems may not be a fundamental feature of pediatric OCD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信