In vitro evaluation of prosthesis-level implant stability using 'BracketPeg'.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hyunkyung Kim, Gwanhwi Noh, Hyunjae Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Sungtae Kim, Young-Dan Cho
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> evaluation of prosthesis-level implant stability using 'BracketPeg'.","authors":"Hyunkyung Kim, Gwanhwi Noh, Hyunjae Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Sungtae Kim, Young-Dan Cho","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2403620181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A small magnetic peg, named \"BracketPeg,\" has been developed as an attachment magnet for implant prostheses. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of measuring implant stability at the prosthesis level, evaluate the reliability and accuracy of BracketPeg, and examine the consistency of measurements obtained using other devices for damping capacity assessment (DCA) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty implants were installed into artificial bone blocks, with each block representing 1 of 4 different diameters (3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.5 mm; 10 implants per diameter). Each implant was paired with a customized zirconia prosthesis that matched the implant diameter. Implant stability was measured at both the fixture and prosthesis levels using Anycheck™ (Neobiotech) for DCA and Osstell™ Beacon (W&H) and ChecQ™ (Dentis) for RFA. To obtain prosthesis-level measurements using RFA devices, BracketPeg was attached to the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the prosthesis to evaluate implant stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was significantly lower at the prosthesis level than at the fixture level (<i>P</i><0.001), reflecting the impact of the increased mass and size of the prosthesis. RFA values varied depending on the position of BracketPeg, with lower stability values observed at the coronal position than at the apical position. The 2 RFA devices demonstrated reasonable agreement between ISQ measurements, with a mean difference of -0.58 (95% confidence interval: ±0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BracketPeg provides reliable and consistent implant stability measurements at the prosthesis level compared to other devices, making it a practical and feasible tool for the clinical evaluation of implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2403620181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A small magnetic peg, named "BracketPeg," has been developed as an attachment magnet for implant prostheses. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of measuring implant stability at the prosthesis level, evaluate the reliability and accuracy of BracketPeg, and examine the consistency of measurements obtained using other devices for damping capacity assessment (DCA) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA).

Methods: Forty implants were installed into artificial bone blocks, with each block representing 1 of 4 different diameters (3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.5 mm; 10 implants per diameter). Each implant was paired with a customized zirconia prosthesis that matched the implant diameter. Implant stability was measured at both the fixture and prosthesis levels using Anycheck™ (Neobiotech) for DCA and Osstell™ Beacon (W&H) and ChecQ™ (Dentis) for RFA. To obtain prosthesis-level measurements using RFA devices, BracketPeg was attached to the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the prosthesis to evaluate implant stability.

Results: The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was significantly lower at the prosthesis level than at the fixture level (P<0.001), reflecting the impact of the increased mass and size of the prosthesis. RFA values varied depending on the position of BracketPeg, with lower stability values observed at the coronal position than at the apical position. The 2 RFA devices demonstrated reasonable agreement between ISQ measurements, with a mean difference of -0.58 (95% confidence interval: ±0.31).

Conclusions: BracketPeg provides reliable and consistent implant stability measurements at the prosthesis level compared to other devices, making it a practical and feasible tool for the clinical evaluation of implants.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信