De-ashed-biochar slow-release N fertilizer increased NUE in alkaline calcareous soils under wheat and maize crops.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Muhammad Rashid, Qaiser Hussain, Khalid Saifullah Khan, Sarosh Alvi, Shokat Ali Abro, Muhammad Akmal, Shahzada Sohail Ijaz, Muhammad Umer, Abdul Ahad Qureshi, Mohamed S Elshikh, Humaira Rizwana, Muhammad Rizwan, Rashid Iqbal
{"title":"De-ashed-biochar slow-release N fertilizer increased NUE in alkaline calcareous soils under wheat and maize crops.","authors":"Muhammad Rashid, Qaiser Hussain, Khalid Saifullah Khan, Sarosh Alvi, Shokat Ali Abro, Muhammad Akmal, Shahzada Sohail Ijaz, Muhammad Umer, Abdul Ahad Qureshi, Mohamed S Elshikh, Humaira Rizwana, Muhammad Rizwan, Rashid Iqbal","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-90651-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently biochar has widely been reported as carrier of SRFs. However, the performance of SRFs synthesized from pristine biochar is still low and could not achieve the significant benefits compared to conventional N fertilizers. To overcome this limitation and research gap, BSRFs were synthesized using modified / de-ashed biochar as N-carrier. We hypothesized that BSRFs would NUE especially in alkaline calcareous soils for whom there is no specific SRF exist previously. In this study, the efficacy of BSRF formulated with 1:1 mass ratio of de-ashed biochar and urea was compared with CU and CSRF for improving NUE under wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system in two different textured soils. The results showed that compared to CU and CSRF, the addition of BSRF significantly increased the retention of soil mineral-N (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N) which, consequently, enhanced the crops' N-uptake up to 23.71% in wheat and 26.55% in maize. It was further observed that SOC contents were increased up to 50.79% in wheat and up to 47.61% in maize at harvest. The addition of BSRF enhanced the CEC up to 32.95% under wheat and up to 27.73% under maize, compared to CU. Eventually, BSRF significantly increased the grain yield and NUE of wheat by 12.04% and 40.44%, while the maize grain yield and NUE increased by 21.06% and 45.56%, respectively. This study concludes that BSRFs had a stronger yield-increasing effect than CU alone attributing to enhanced N retention and crop uptake in alkaline calcareous soils. It was also found that the de-ashed biochar is a strong candidate to formulate new SRFs with improved performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"7748"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90651-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently biochar has widely been reported as carrier of SRFs. However, the performance of SRFs synthesized from pristine biochar is still low and could not achieve the significant benefits compared to conventional N fertilizers. To overcome this limitation and research gap, BSRFs were synthesized using modified / de-ashed biochar as N-carrier. We hypothesized that BSRFs would NUE especially in alkaline calcareous soils for whom there is no specific SRF exist previously. In this study, the efficacy of BSRF formulated with 1:1 mass ratio of de-ashed biochar and urea was compared with CU and CSRF for improving NUE under wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system in two different textured soils. The results showed that compared to CU and CSRF, the addition of BSRF significantly increased the retention of soil mineral-N (NH4+-N, NO3--N) which, consequently, enhanced the crops' N-uptake up to 23.71% in wheat and 26.55% in maize. It was further observed that SOC contents were increased up to 50.79% in wheat and up to 47.61% in maize at harvest. The addition of BSRF enhanced the CEC up to 32.95% under wheat and up to 27.73% under maize, compared to CU. Eventually, BSRF significantly increased the grain yield and NUE of wheat by 12.04% and 40.44%, while the maize grain yield and NUE increased by 21.06% and 45.56%, respectively. This study concludes that BSRFs had a stronger yield-increasing effect than CU alone attributing to enhanced N retention and crop uptake in alkaline calcareous soils. It was also found that the de-ashed biochar is a strong candidate to formulate new SRFs with improved performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脱灰生物炭缓释氮肥提高了小麦和玉米碱土的氮肥利用率。
近年来,生物炭作为srf的载体被广泛报道。然而,与传统氮肥相比,由原始生物炭合成的SRFs的性能仍然较低,无法取得显著的效益。为了克服这一局限性和研究空白,以改性/去灰化生物炭为n载体合成了bsrf。我们假设,特别是在碱性钙质土壤中,没有特定的SRF存在。本研究比较了在小麦和玉米两种不同质地土壤下,以去灰化生物炭与尿素质量比为1:1配制BSRF与CU和CSRF提高氮肥利用率的效果。结果表明,与CU和CSRF相比,BSRF显著提高了土壤矿质氮(NH4+-N、NO3——N)的滞留量,使小麦和玉米的氮素吸收量分别提高了23.71%和26.55%。收获期小麦和玉米的有机碳含量分别提高了50.79%和47.61%。与CU相比,添加BSRF可使小麦和玉米的CEC分别提高32.95%和27.73%。结果表明,BSRF显著提高了小麦产量和氮肥利用效率,分别提高了12.04%和40.44%,玉米产量和氮肥利用效率分别提高了21.06%和45.56%。综上所述,在碱性钙质土壤中,BSRFs比单独施用CU具有更强的增产效应,其原因是BSRFs提高了氮素的保留和作物的吸收。研究还发现,去灰化生物炭是制备性能更好的新型srf的有力候选材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信