Real-world application of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) as chronic migraine preventive therapy: Profiling responders and predictive factors.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alessandro Viganò, Barbara Petolicchio, Massimiliano Toscano, Sonia Ruggero, Romina Di Giambattista, Marta Puma, Jacopo Lanzone, Angelo Bellinvia, Nicholas Diani, Matteo Castaldo, Chiara Valota, Rita De Sanctis, Paola Tiberio, Marta Altieri, Edmond Gilliéron, Vittorio Di Piero
{"title":"Real-world application of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) as chronic migraine preventive therapy: Profiling responders and predictive factors.","authors":"Alessandro Viganò, Barbara Petolicchio, Massimiliano Toscano, Sonia Ruggero, Romina Di Giambattista, Marta Puma, Jacopo Lanzone, Angelo Bellinvia, Nicholas Diani, Matteo Castaldo, Chiara Valota, Rita De Sanctis, Paola Tiberio, Marta Altieri, Edmond Gilliéron, Vittorio Di Piero","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08075-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among non-pharmacological approach for chronic migraine (CM), Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) is suggested in CM and, particularly, in interrupting medication overuse (MO). In this study, we aim at identifying clinical predictive factors to identify CM patients who could more likely respond to STPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a prospective real-world observational study on CM patients undergoing STPP. We collected clinical data related to migraine burden (baseline headache days, number of acute medications used, MIDAS, HIT-6), as well as psychiatric comorbidities (though MINI) and mentalization level obtained by the STPP first interview phase (called BPI) to use them as predictive factors by univariate and discriminant function analysis at 3 (early) and 6 months (only sustained response).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 119 patients (mean age 39.90 ± 14.4, F = 102); 113(94%) completed the STPP treatment. All patients presented a low-to-intermediate mentalization level. After stand-alone STPP, we observed a reduction in monthly headache days and MO at 3 months. Mentalization level didn't affect the STPP outcome (p = 0.40). Early response was directly related to a higher baseline headache days number, the previous used of alternative therapies, and higher Hamilton Depression scale scores. Sustained response was predicted by current use of preventive therapy, pain intensity, HIT-6 score, hypomania, and dysthymia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study showed that STPP could represent a valid therapeutic option in complex CM patients with a high number of headache days and comorbid depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08075-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Among non-pharmacological approach for chronic migraine (CM), Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) is suggested in CM and, particularly, in interrupting medication overuse (MO). In this study, we aim at identifying clinical predictive factors to identify CM patients who could more likely respond to STPP.

Methods: We designed a prospective real-world observational study on CM patients undergoing STPP. We collected clinical data related to migraine burden (baseline headache days, number of acute medications used, MIDAS, HIT-6), as well as psychiatric comorbidities (though MINI) and mentalization level obtained by the STPP first interview phase (called BPI) to use them as predictive factors by univariate and discriminant function analysis at 3 (early) and 6 months (only sustained response).

Results: We recruited 119 patients (mean age 39.90 ± 14.4, F = 102); 113(94%) completed the STPP treatment. All patients presented a low-to-intermediate mentalization level. After stand-alone STPP, we observed a reduction in monthly headache days and MO at 3 months. Mentalization level didn't affect the STPP outcome (p = 0.40). Early response was directly related to a higher baseline headache days number, the previous used of alternative therapies, and higher Hamilton Depression scale scores. Sustained response was predicted by current use of preventive therapy, pain intensity, HIT-6 score, hypomania, and dysthymia.

Conclusion: This real-world study showed that STPP could represent a valid therapeutic option in complex CM patients with a high number of headache days and comorbid depression.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信