Activity of Rezafungin Against Echinocandin Non-wild type Candida glabrata Clinical Isolates From a Global Surveillance Program.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae702
Mariana Castanheira, Lalitagauri M Deshpande, John H Kimbrough, Marisa Winkler
{"title":"Activity of Rezafungin Against Echinocandin Non-wild type <i>Candida glabrata</i> Clinical Isolates From a Global Surveillance Program.","authors":"Mariana Castanheira, Lalitagauri M Deshpande, John H Kimbrough, Marisa Winkler","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among 1463 <i>Candida glabrata</i> isolates collected in 39 US hospitals, 91 (6.2%) were non-wild type to ≥1 echinocandins (ECH-NWT) when tested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution method and interpretative criteria. Rezafungin breakpoints established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were also applied. ECH-NWT isolates were noted in all US census divisions, and 71 (79.0% of ECH-NWT) carried FKS hot spot (HS) alterations. S663P in FKS2 HS1 (31 isolates) was the most common alteration, followed by substitutions/deletions in position F659 in FKS2 HS1 (14 isolates) and S629P in FKS1 HS1 (9 isolates). Six isolates had substitutions in the HSs of FKS1 and FKS2, and 8 other alterations were noted in the 11 remaining isolates. When CLSI/FDA breakpoints were applied, rezafungin was active against 97.5%/95.3% and 59.3%/23.9% of the overall <i>C glabrata</i> and ECH-NWT isolates, respectively. Anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin inhibited 93.9%/13.2%, 95.7%/33.0%, and 95.6%/29.7% of the overall <i>C glabrata</i>/ECH-NWT isolates. Isolates that did not harbor FKS HS substitutions were more susceptible to echinocandins when compared with isolates with substitutions (47.4%-100% and 4.2%-49.3%; lowest for anidulafungin and highest for rezafungin per the CLSI breakpoint). Isolates harboring the FKS2 HS1 S663P alterations were more resistant to echinocandins-3.2% susceptible (anidulafungin) to 35.5% (rezafungin CLSI breakpoint)-when compared with other single alterations. Rezafungin dosing and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics allow for coverage of higher minimum inhibitory concentration values, making this agent an attractive option for some isolates that carry FKS alterations and still demonstrate rezafungin-susceptible minimum inhibitory concentration values.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"ofae702"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among 1463 Candida glabrata isolates collected in 39 US hospitals, 91 (6.2%) were non-wild type to ≥1 echinocandins (ECH-NWT) when tested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution method and interpretative criteria. Rezafungin breakpoints established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were also applied. ECH-NWT isolates were noted in all US census divisions, and 71 (79.0% of ECH-NWT) carried FKS hot spot (HS) alterations. S663P in FKS2 HS1 (31 isolates) was the most common alteration, followed by substitutions/deletions in position F659 in FKS2 HS1 (14 isolates) and S629P in FKS1 HS1 (9 isolates). Six isolates had substitutions in the HSs of FKS1 and FKS2, and 8 other alterations were noted in the 11 remaining isolates. When CLSI/FDA breakpoints were applied, rezafungin was active against 97.5%/95.3% and 59.3%/23.9% of the overall C glabrata and ECH-NWT isolates, respectively. Anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin inhibited 93.9%/13.2%, 95.7%/33.0%, and 95.6%/29.7% of the overall C glabrata/ECH-NWT isolates. Isolates that did not harbor FKS HS substitutions were more susceptible to echinocandins when compared with isolates with substitutions (47.4%-100% and 4.2%-49.3%; lowest for anidulafungin and highest for rezafungin per the CLSI breakpoint). Isolates harboring the FKS2 HS1 S663P alterations were more resistant to echinocandins-3.2% susceptible (anidulafungin) to 35.5% (rezafungin CLSI breakpoint)-when compared with other single alterations. Rezafungin dosing and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics allow for coverage of higher minimum inhibitory concentration values, making this agent an attractive option for some isolates that carry FKS alterations and still demonstrate rezafungin-susceptible minimum inhibitory concentration values.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信