Surgical risk of CSF leakage following endoscopic transorbital approach for anterior and middle skull base pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sergio Corvino, Jacopo Berardinelli, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Roberto Altieri, Iacopo Dallan, Francesco Corrivetti, Matteo de Notaris
{"title":"Surgical risk of CSF leakage following endoscopic transorbital approach for anterior and middle skull base pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sergio Corvino, Jacopo Berardinelli, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Roberto Altieri, Iacopo Dallan, Francesco Corrivetti, Matteo de Notaris","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03426-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach (SETOA) has demonstrated considerable versatility and effectiveness in managing various paramedian anterior and middle skull base pathologies. However, as with any relatively new technique, potential complications remain. We conducted an extensive literature search in MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines including case reports and surgical series reporting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate following SETOA for intracranial pathologies. Factors analyzed included lesion location (extra- or intra-axial), reconstruction techniques, and complication management. ROBINS-I tool was employed to assess the risk of bias. Twenty-five studies including 240 cases were eligible. The majority of lesions were intradural extra-axial (68.3%), while trigeminal schwannomas comprised all extradural cases (25.0%). Sixteen patients (6.6%) presented intradural intra-axial tumors. Osteodural reconstruction involved dural substitutes in one third of the cases (32.5%) either alone (14.2%) or combined with fat free graft (18.3%). CSF leak occurred in 6 patients (2.50%), mostly resolving via conservative management (66.6%). The risk of postoperative CSF leak was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing resection for intra-axial tumors (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.49) compared to those undergoing resection for extra-axial (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; p < 0.001). Key limitations include the retrospective nature and small sample sizes among included studies as well as data heterogeneity and lack of standardized protocols for reconstruction across studies. SETOA appears safe for addressing selected extradural and intradural skull base pathologies with a low postoperative CSF leak rate. The natural repositioning of the orbital content to its original position may be instrumental in preventing its postoperative occurrence. The investigation followed a prespecified protocol registered on PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024614111).</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03426-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach (SETOA) has demonstrated considerable versatility and effectiveness in managing various paramedian anterior and middle skull base pathologies. However, as with any relatively new technique, potential complications remain. We conducted an extensive literature search in MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines including case reports and surgical series reporting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate following SETOA for intracranial pathologies. Factors analyzed included lesion location (extra- or intra-axial), reconstruction techniques, and complication management. ROBINS-I tool was employed to assess the risk of bias. Twenty-five studies including 240 cases were eligible. The majority of lesions were intradural extra-axial (68.3%), while trigeminal schwannomas comprised all extradural cases (25.0%). Sixteen patients (6.6%) presented intradural intra-axial tumors. Osteodural reconstruction involved dural substitutes in one third of the cases (32.5%) either alone (14.2%) or combined with fat free graft (18.3%). CSF leak occurred in 6 patients (2.50%), mostly resolving via conservative management (66.6%). The risk of postoperative CSF leak was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing resection for intra-axial tumors (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.49) compared to those undergoing resection for extra-axial (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001). Key limitations include the retrospective nature and small sample sizes among included studies as well as data heterogeneity and lack of standardized protocols for reconstruction across studies. SETOA appears safe for addressing selected extradural and intradural skull base pathologies with a low postoperative CSF leak rate. The natural repositioning of the orbital content to its original position may be instrumental in preventing its postoperative occurrence. The investigation followed a prespecified protocol registered on PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024614111).

内窥镜经眶入路治疗前中颅底病变后 CSF 渗漏的手术风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信