An overview of the use of the dorsum sellae and clival line as a guide in endoscopic third ventriculostomy: historical, anatomical and technical aspects.
José Javier Guil-Ibáñez, Mario Gomar-Alba, María José Castelló-Ruiz, Leandro Saucedo, Tesifón Parrón-Carreño, Gracia M Castro-Luna, Antonio Huete-Allut, José Masegosa-González
{"title":"An overview of the use of the dorsum sellae and clival line as a guide in endoscopic third ventriculostomy: historical, anatomical and technical aspects.","authors":"José Javier Guil-Ibáñez, Mario Gomar-Alba, María José Castelló-Ruiz, Leandro Saucedo, Tesifón Parrón-Carreño, Gracia M Castro-Luna, Antonio Huete-Allut, José Masegosa-González","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03434-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has become one of the fundamental procedures in the treatment of obstructive or non-communicating hydrocephalus nowadays. One of the main challenges faced by groups new to the technique, which determines its success, is the perforation of the floor of the third ventricle and entry into the prepontine cistern. In various descriptions of the technique, it is common to refer to the middle third of an imaginary line drawn between the mammillary bodies and the infundibular recess as the perforation point. However, this is often an arbitrary point that depends on different factors such as the patient's anatomy and the operator's level of experience. Our group believes that using the dorsum sellae and clival line as a reference point to guide this perforation and enter to the prepontine cistern can be helpful, providing neurosurgeons with a stable, consistent, and familiar anatomical landmark that reduces uncertainty regarding the technique. After conducting a literature search, we found limited representation of the topic we aim to address here. Therefore, the objective of this article is to provide a historical, anatomical, and technical review of the use of the dorsum sellae and clival line as a guide for performing ETV.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03434-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has become one of the fundamental procedures in the treatment of obstructive or non-communicating hydrocephalus nowadays. One of the main challenges faced by groups new to the technique, which determines its success, is the perforation of the floor of the third ventricle and entry into the prepontine cistern. In various descriptions of the technique, it is common to refer to the middle third of an imaginary line drawn between the mammillary bodies and the infundibular recess as the perforation point. However, this is often an arbitrary point that depends on different factors such as the patient's anatomy and the operator's level of experience. Our group believes that using the dorsum sellae and clival line as a reference point to guide this perforation and enter to the prepontine cistern can be helpful, providing neurosurgeons with a stable, consistent, and familiar anatomical landmark that reduces uncertainty regarding the technique. After conducting a literature search, we found limited representation of the topic we aim to address here. Therefore, the objective of this article is to provide a historical, anatomical, and technical review of the use of the dorsum sellae and clival line as a guide for performing ETV.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.