Implant infection after prepectoral breast reconstruction treated with negative pressure wound therapy and photobiomodulation: a case report.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Rosa Di Micco, Letizia Santurro, Veronica Zuber, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Giovanni Cisternino, Pitoni Ludovica, Raffaele Ceccarino, Stefano Antonio Rottino, Ornella Forma, Oreste D Gentilini
{"title":"Implant infection after prepectoral breast reconstruction treated with negative pressure wound therapy and photobiomodulation: a case report.","authors":"Rosa Di Micco, Letizia Santurro, Veronica Zuber, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Giovanni Cisternino, Pitoni Ludovica, Raffaele Ceccarino, Stefano Antonio Rottino, Ornella Forma, Oreste D Gentilini","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2022.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prepectoral breast reconstruction is a relatively new surgical technique that allows placement of the implant directly over the pectoralis major. It has benefits in terms of patient wellbeing, operative time, postoperative pain and recovery. However, in cases of infection, implant removal is often required and the patient is left with a flat chest. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of breast implant infection after breast reconstruction, successfully treated with a combination of both negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and photobiomodulation (PBM). A 32-year-old female patient with a BRCA2 mutation had undergone bilateral risk-reducing, nipple-sparing mastectomy for in situ ductal breast carcinoma followed by a prepectoral reconstruction. On the left side, the patient presented with dehiscence of 2.5cm with implant exposure 90 days after surgery. After an initial conservative approach, the patient's condition worsened, and she developed a larger dehiscence and a red breast. She was treated with implant removal. PBM of the cavity and the application of VeraFlo Therapy (3M, US) with a polyurethane-foam filling in the residual cavity were adopted. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> was isolated and appropriate antibiotic therapy was started. Every 48-72 hours, she returned to the operating room for a washout, PBM, microbiological swabs, foam exchange and continuing NPWT. After 21 days of this approach and two consecutive negative swabs, the patient underwent breast reconstruction with a subpectoral expander. After six months, a definitive implant of the same size as the contralateral one was positioned. The cosmetic result was good and patient satisfaction was high. The combination of NPWT and PBM may represent a good solution in case of breast implant infection after prepectoral reconstruction with benefits in terms of surgical outcome, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 3","pages":"180-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2022.0097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prepectoral breast reconstruction is a relatively new surgical technique that allows placement of the implant directly over the pectoralis major. It has benefits in terms of patient wellbeing, operative time, postoperative pain and recovery. However, in cases of infection, implant removal is often required and the patient is left with a flat chest. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of breast implant infection after breast reconstruction, successfully treated with a combination of both negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and photobiomodulation (PBM). A 32-year-old female patient with a BRCA2 mutation had undergone bilateral risk-reducing, nipple-sparing mastectomy for in situ ductal breast carcinoma followed by a prepectoral reconstruction. On the left side, the patient presented with dehiscence of 2.5cm with implant exposure 90 days after surgery. After an initial conservative approach, the patient's condition worsened, and she developed a larger dehiscence and a red breast. She was treated with implant removal. PBM of the cavity and the application of VeraFlo Therapy (3M, US) with a polyurethane-foam filling in the residual cavity were adopted. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated and appropriate antibiotic therapy was started. Every 48-72 hours, she returned to the operating room for a washout, PBM, microbiological swabs, foam exchange and continuing NPWT. After 21 days of this approach and two consecutive negative swabs, the patient underwent breast reconstruction with a subpectoral expander. After six months, a definitive implant of the same size as the contralateral one was positioned. The cosmetic result was good and patient satisfaction was high. The combination of NPWT and PBM may represent a good solution in case of breast implant infection after prepectoral reconstruction with benefits in terms of surgical outcome, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life.

负压创面及光生物调节治疗孕前乳房重建术后植入物感染1例。
胸前乳房重建术是一种相对较新的外科技术,它允许将植入物直接放置在胸大肌上。它对病人的健康、手术时间、术后疼痛和恢复都有好处。然而,在感染的情况下,通常需要移除植入物,患者的胸部就会变得平坦。据作者所知,这是第一例乳房重建后乳房植入物感染,成功地结合负压伤口治疗(NPWT)和光生物调节(PBM)治疗。一名32岁的BRCA2突变女性患者因原位导管乳腺癌接受了双侧降低风险、保留乳头的乳房切除术,随后进行了乳房前重建。左侧患者术后90天出现2.5cm裂开,植入物外露。在最初的保守治疗后,患者病情恶化,出现了更大的裂口和红色乳房。她接受了植入物移除治疗。采用PBM对空腔进行处理,使用美国3M公司的VeraFlo therapeutics对残余空腔进行聚氨酯泡沫填充。分离出铜绿假单胞菌并开始适当的抗生素治疗。每隔48-72小时,患者返回手术室进行冲洗、PBM、微生物拭子、泡沫交换和继续NPWT。经过21天的这种方法和连续两次阴性拭子,患者接受乳房重建与胸下扩张器。六个月后,植入与对侧相同大小的确定植入物。美容效果良好,患者满意度高。NPWT和PBM的联合应用可能是一种很好的解决乳房再造后植入物感染的方法,在手术效果、患者满意度和术后生活质量方面都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信