Effectiveness of an enhanced silver-containing dressing in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2025-03-02 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2025.0023
Stefania Beraldo, Jan Ljungqvist, Rebecca Rodger, Beate Hanson, Catarina Saavedra
{"title":"Effectiveness of an enhanced silver-containing dressing in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Stefania Beraldo, Jan Ljungqvist, Rebecca Rodger, Beate Hanson, Catarina Saavedra","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2025.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of a carboxymethylcellulose dressing containing ionic silver, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and benzethonium chloride (CISEB) versus a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride-coated dressing (DACC) in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a multinational, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients with hard-to-heal VLUs were randomised 1:1 to receive CISEB (n=100) or DACC (n=103) for up to four weeks. VLUs that were not healed by week 4 were managed with standard of care for up to 12 weeks or until healed (whichever was sooner). The primary endpoint was complete wound closure at week 12. Additional endpoints included time to complete wound closure and incidence of adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial cohort included 203 patients. CISEB achieved a higher rate of complete wound closure by week 12 compared to DACC (74.8% versus 55.6%, respectively; p<0.0031), and was associated with a 35% increased likelihood of healing (risk ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.65). Median time to complete wound closure was shorter in the CISEB arm (56 days) compared to the DACC arm (70 days; p<0.0272). A smaller proportion of patients experienced an AE with CISEB compared to DACC (5.0% versus 17.6%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of hard-to-heal VLUs with CISEB was associated with improved healing outcomes compared to DACC, without additional safety concerns. CISEB is a gelling fibre dressing with antimicrobial, metal-chelating and surfactant components that may promote an optimal healing environment to address the challenge of hard-to-heal wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 3","pages":"170-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of a carboxymethylcellulose dressing containing ionic silver, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and benzethonium chloride (CISEB) versus a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride-coated dressing (DACC) in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs).

Method: In a multinational, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients with hard-to-heal VLUs were randomised 1:1 to receive CISEB (n=100) or DACC (n=103) for up to four weeks. VLUs that were not healed by week 4 were managed with standard of care for up to 12 weeks or until healed (whichever was sooner). The primary endpoint was complete wound closure at week 12. Additional endpoints included time to complete wound closure and incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The trial cohort included 203 patients. CISEB achieved a higher rate of complete wound closure by week 12 compared to DACC (74.8% versus 55.6%, respectively; p<0.0031), and was associated with a 35% increased likelihood of healing (risk ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.65). Median time to complete wound closure was shorter in the CISEB arm (56 days) compared to the DACC arm (70 days; p<0.0272). A smaller proportion of patients experienced an AE with CISEB compared to DACC (5.0% versus 17.6%, respectively).

Conclusion: Management of hard-to-heal VLUs with CISEB was associated with improved healing outcomes compared to DACC, without additional safety concerns. CISEB is a gelling fibre dressing with antimicrobial, metal-chelating and surfactant components that may promote an optimal healing environment to address the challenge of hard-to-heal wounds.

增强型含银敷料治疗难以愈合的腿部静脉溃疡的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价含有离子银、乙二胺四乙酸和苄索氯铵的羧甲基纤维素敷料(CISEB)与二烷基氨基甲酰氯涂层敷料(DACC)治疗难以愈合的静脉性腿部溃疡(VLUs)的疗效和安全性。方法:在一项多国、多中心、随机对照试验中,难以治愈的vlu患者以1:1的比例随机分配,接受CISEB (n=100)或DACC (n=103)治疗长达四周。第4周未愈合的vlu采用标准护理治疗长达12周或直到愈合(以较早者为准)。主要终点是第12周伤口完全愈合。其他终点包括完成伤口闭合的时间和不良事件(ae)的发生率。结果:试验队列包括203例患者。与DACC相比,CISEB在第12周实现了更高的伤口完全愈合率(分别为74.8%和55.6%;结论:与DACC相比,CISEB治疗难以治愈的vlu与改善的愈合结果相关,没有额外的安全性问题。CISEB是一种胶凝纤维敷料,具有抗菌、金属螯合和表面活性剂成分,可促进最佳愈合环境,以解决难以愈合的伤口的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信