Minjae Yoon, Taeho Hur, Sung-Ji Park, Sang-Ho Jo, Eung Ju Kim, Soo-Joong Kim, Musarrat Hussain, Cam-Hao Hua, Sungyoung Lee, Dong-Ju Choi
{"title":"Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Feedback via Mobile App in Treatment of Uncontrolled Hypertension: the SMART-BP Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Minjae Yoon, Taeho Hur, Sung-Ji Park, Sang-Ho Jo, Eung Ju Kim, Soo-Joong Kim, Musarrat Hussain, Cam-Hao Hua, Sungyoung Lee, Dong-Ju Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of mobile apps with tailored recommendations on changes in blood pressure (BP) and drug adherence.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of self-monitoring of BP (SMBP) with a mobile application-based feedback algorithm (SMBP app with feedback) compared with SMBP alone. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension aged 19 years or older were randomly assigned. In the control group, the patients only measured their BP at home using the mobile app combined with a Bluetooth BP monitor and received standard care, whereas in the intervention group, the patients could also receive alerts for BP measurement and additional recommendations from the app using a feedback algorithm in response to the obtained BP value. The primary end point was the change in mean home systolic BP at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September 1, 2019, through July 8, 2020, 184 patients were randomized into 2 groups: SMBP app with feedback (n=97) and SMBP alone (n=87). At 24 weeks, the mean ± SD home systolic BP reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the SMBP app with feedback group than in the SMBP alone group (-22.4±13.5 vs -17.2±13.3 mm Hg; P=.02). The SMBP app with feedback group had higher drug adherence and proportion of adherence of 95% or greater than the SMBP alone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SMBP app with feedback is superior to SMBP alone in terms of systolic BP reduction and improved drug adherence in patients with hypertension. Given the high cost of traditional interventions between patients and health care professionals, feedback through mobile apps could potentially be a useful tool in the management of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04470284.</p>","PeriodicalId":18334,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.09.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of mobile apps with tailored recommendations on changes in blood pressure (BP) and drug adherence.
Patients and methods: This study is a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of self-monitoring of BP (SMBP) with a mobile application-based feedback algorithm (SMBP app with feedback) compared with SMBP alone. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension aged 19 years or older were randomly assigned. In the control group, the patients only measured their BP at home using the mobile app combined with a Bluetooth BP monitor and received standard care, whereas in the intervention group, the patients could also receive alerts for BP measurement and additional recommendations from the app using a feedback algorithm in response to the obtained BP value. The primary end point was the change in mean home systolic BP at 24 weeks.
Results: From September 1, 2019, through July 8, 2020, 184 patients were randomized into 2 groups: SMBP app with feedback (n=97) and SMBP alone (n=87). At 24 weeks, the mean ± SD home systolic BP reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the SMBP app with feedback group than in the SMBP alone group (-22.4±13.5 vs -17.2±13.3 mm Hg; P=.02). The SMBP app with feedback group had higher drug adherence and proportion of adherence of 95% or greater than the SMBP alone group.
Conclusion: The SMBP app with feedback is superior to SMBP alone in terms of systolic BP reduction and improved drug adherence in patients with hypertension. Given the high cost of traditional interventions between patients and health care professionals, feedback through mobile apps could potentially be a useful tool in the management of hypertension.
目的:评估具有量身定制推荐的移动应用程序对血压(BP)变化和药物依从性的影响。患者和方法:本研究是一项随机、开放标签、多中心的试验,旨在评估使用基于移动应用程序的反馈算法(SMBP应用程序带反馈)自我监测血压(SMBP)与单独使用SMBP的疗效。19岁及以上未控制的高血压患者被随机分配。在对照组中,患者仅在家中使用结合蓝牙血压监测仪的移动应用程序测量血压并接受标准护理,而在干预组中,患者还可以接收血压测量警报和应用程序根据获得的血压值使用反馈算法提供的额外建议。主要终点是24周时平均家庭收缩压的变化。结果:2019年9月1日至2020年7月8日,184例患者随机分为两组:带反馈的SMBP应用程序(n=97)和单独SMBP (n=87)。在24周时,SMBP应用程序与反馈组从基线开始的平均±SD家庭收缩压降低明显大于单独SMBP组(-22.4±13.5 vs -17.2±13.3 mm Hg;P = .02点)。SMBP应用程序与反馈组的药物依从性更高,依从率为95%或更高。结论:有反馈的SMBP应用程序在降低收缩压和改善高血压患者的药物依从性方面优于单用SMBP。考虑到患者和医疗保健专业人员之间传统干预的高成本,通过移动应用程序的反馈可能成为高血压管理的有用工具。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT04470284。
期刊介绍:
Mayo Clinic Proceedings is a premier peer-reviewed clinical journal in general medicine. Sponsored by Mayo Clinic, it is one of the most widely read and highly cited scientific publications for physicians. Since 1926, Mayo Clinic Proceedings has continuously published articles that focus on clinical medicine and support the professional and educational needs of its readers. The journal welcomes submissions from authors worldwide and includes Nobel-prize-winning research in its content. With an Impact Factor of 8.9, Mayo Clinic Proceedings is ranked #20 out of 167 journals in the Medicine, General and Internal category, placing it in the top 12% of these journals. It invites manuscripts on clinical and laboratory medicine, health care policy and economics, medical education and ethics, and related topics.