Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression improves gait quality and stance balance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Penghui Ke, Liuhu Han, Wenfeng Xu, Yang Song, Benfan Zhu, Likui Wang
{"title":"Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression improves gait quality and stance balance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Penghui Ke, Liuhu Han, Wenfeng Xu, Yang Song, Benfan Zhu, Likui Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05631-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (Endo-ULBD) has been applied to patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). However, it remains unclear whether gait and postural balance in LSS patients fully recover to normal levels following ULBD surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 60 symptomatic LSS patients (LSS group) and 60 healthy age-matched adults (control group). The LSS group was assessed at four time points: preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Evaluations included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, as well as assessments of gait and balance. The control group underwent gait and balance evaluations on the day of recruitment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LSS group showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI at 3, 6, and 12 months after ULBD surgery (p < 0.05). Cadence improved at 3 months postoperatively, while walking speed, stride length, and double support duration improved at 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in gait spatiotemporal parameters between the LSS group and the healthy control group (p > 0.05). Preoperatively, the LSS group exhibited differences in COP path length and 90% COP postural sway area compared to the control group. Postoperatively, there was no significant improvement in COP path length at any time point. However, there were differences in 90% COP postural sway area at 12 months after surgery compared to the preoperative and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSS patients showed significant improvement in gait after ULBD surgery, with gait parameters comparable to those of healthy controls at 12 months. While balance stability improved at 12 months, it remained inferior to that of age-matched healthy controls, indicating that postoperative balance training is necessary for full recovery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study, approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Ethical Application Reference: PJ2023-07-13 Anhui, China) and was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 20/06/2023 (ChiCTR2300072649). The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and clinical practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05631-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (Endo-ULBD) has been applied to patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). However, it remains unclear whether gait and postural balance in LSS patients fully recover to normal levels following ULBD surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study included 60 symptomatic LSS patients (LSS group) and 60 healthy age-matched adults (control group). The LSS group was assessed at four time points: preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Evaluations included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, as well as assessments of gait and balance. The control group underwent gait and balance evaluations on the day of recruitment.

Results: The LSS group showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI at 3, 6, and 12 months after ULBD surgery (p < 0.05). Cadence improved at 3 months postoperatively, while walking speed, stride length, and double support duration improved at 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in gait spatiotemporal parameters between the LSS group and the healthy control group (p > 0.05). Preoperatively, the LSS group exhibited differences in COP path length and 90% COP postural sway area compared to the control group. Postoperatively, there was no significant improvement in COP path length at any time point. However, there were differences in 90% COP postural sway area at 12 months after surgery compared to the preoperative and control groups.

Conclusion: LSS patients showed significant improvement in gait after ULBD surgery, with gait parameters comparable to those of healthy controls at 12 months. While balance stability improved at 12 months, it remained inferior to that of age-matched healthy controls, indicating that postoperative balance training is necessary for full recovery.

Trial registration: This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study, approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Ethical Application Reference: PJ2023-07-13 Anhui, China) and was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 20/06/2023 (ChiCTR2300072649). The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and clinical practice guidelines.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信