Therapeutic applications of drug coated balloons in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Ying Tao, Dunming Xiao, Yingyao Chen, Shimeng Liu
{"title":"Therapeutic applications of drug coated balloons in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis.","authors":"Ying Tao, Dunming Xiao, Yingyao Chen, Shimeng Liu","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) represents a major cause of ischemic stroke, with endovascular treatments, such as stenting, facing challenges such as restenosis and complications. Drug coated balloons (DCBs) provide a promising alternative by delivering targeted drug without permanent implants. This review systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of DCBs for symptomatic ICAS, providing evidence based insights to guide clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched from inception to October 16, 2023, to identify studies on DCBs for symptomatic ICAS. Two independent researchers screened the literature and extracted data. A meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with random or fixed effects models to assess perioperative safety and restenosis rates. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included six controlled studies and 16 single arm studies involving 1308 patients with ≥70% stenosis. In single arm studies, the pooled restenosis rate for DCBs was 7.34% (95% CI 0.05 to 0.10, I²=44%, P=0.04), with a perioperative stroke and mortality rate of 5.75% (95% CI 0.04 to 0.08, I²=25%, P=0.18). The follow-up stroke and transient ischemic attack rate was 1.26% (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03, I²=33%, P=0.11). In controlled studies, DCBs significantly reduced restenosis rates compared with conventional balloons (OR=0.24, P=0.003) and stents (OR=0.20, P<0.001), without increasing perioperative adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, DCBs showed significant potential as an effective therapeutic option for symptomatic ICAS in clinical practice, offering lower restenosis rates compared with conventional endovascular approaches while maintaining comparable safety profiles. However, further larger scale, high quality prospective studies are essential to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols for their application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) represents a major cause of ischemic stroke, with endovascular treatments, such as stenting, facing challenges such as restenosis and complications. Drug coated balloons (DCBs) provide a promising alternative by delivering targeted drug without permanent implants. This review systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of DCBs for symptomatic ICAS, providing evidence based insights to guide clinical practice.

Methods: Databases were searched from inception to October 16, 2023, to identify studies on DCBs for symptomatic ICAS. Two independent researchers screened the literature and extracted data. A meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with random or fixed effects models to assess perioperative safety and restenosis rates. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated.

Results: The analysis included six controlled studies and 16 single arm studies involving 1308 patients with ≥70% stenosis. In single arm studies, the pooled restenosis rate for DCBs was 7.34% (95% CI 0.05 to 0.10, I²=44%, P=0.04), with a perioperative stroke and mortality rate of 5.75% (95% CI 0.04 to 0.08, I²=25%, P=0.18). The follow-up stroke and transient ischemic attack rate was 1.26% (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03, I²=33%, P=0.11). In controlled studies, DCBs significantly reduced restenosis rates compared with conventional balloons (OR=0.24, P=0.003) and stents (OR=0.20, P<0.001), without increasing perioperative adverse events.

Conclusions: In this study, DCBs showed significant potential as an effective therapeutic option for symptomatic ICAS in clinical practice, offering lower restenosis rates compared with conventional endovascular approaches while maintaining comparable safety profiles. However, further larger scale, high quality prospective studies are essential to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols for their application.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信